Ned Rocknroll
I have a major announcement to make!
Kate Winslet (SEE), after having married and divorced an LSE director, has married.......
It is our Socionics duty to type the fellow; maybe we should also have a pole, whether you approve of disapprove.
Ned Rocknroll
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What is the major announcement?
Every time I see her I think "Draw me like one of you French girls" and I giggle.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
The big announcement is that she may be now married to someone way more compatible to her than ESTj
I get P on this guy so far.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm pretty sure that people of any "socionics type" can be happily married if they have similar values and enough stuff in common.Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan
He looks emotionally "big".
By the way, what the fuck kind of a name is Rocknroll?
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
No they can't be. If you go hiking with someone you can't talk to does it really sooth and comfort you to go hiking with that person?
Values? pick a few...church, you still can't stand the person, you can't have a word of conversation with them without being understood...does it matter what you value?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
oh well,
I think he's some Sp type XSXp Better choice than an LSE but I really want to get his type for sure;
let's see
ESFp would be really good
ESTp would be really not so good
ISTp would be better than an ESTp
ISFp would be really really bad.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
who the fuck names themself "Ned Rocknroll"?
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Sam Mendes's type is not ESTJ, maybe ESFP. She may be now married to someone way more compatible to her than him, but may be not. The main problem here - I do not see any video interview with her new husband, so there is no way to type him confidently.
But values depend on types they haveOf cause "any types can" because "anything can be" in our world, the questions are: 1) price, 2) probability. Unfortunatelly, this should be experimentaly researched for intertypes relations still, but looks like some IR are good and bad indeed for marriage.
It's not going to be "researched" because no legitimate academic institutions take socionics seriously.But values depend on types they have
I really hope you're not basing your relationship on this shit.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
But it can be researched. The main things for it are money and time - not so much, but considerable. There are many guys with degree and whole academic institutions wich will agree to make such research if you'll pay them. They research even telepathy sometimes.
Same I realy hope about you, because as I've seen no one here have good ability in typing to use Socionics for this.I really hope you're not basing your relationship on this shit.
No, the main thing is a reputable academic institution taking it seriously and it's not going to happen because it was developed by a fucking Lithuanian economist who was Dean at a Univsersity that produces primary school teachers.
There is absolutely no reason to believe that socionics is anything other than the dim musings of a Lithuanian economist teacher of elementary school teachers. You would be better served taking all of your health and nutrition advice from Oprah Winfrey than attempting to apply socionics to your life.
Of course nobody is good at it. Socionics is the bare bones of what is probably an incredibly worthless theory anyway.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Another about to be assumed duality, another victory for Socionics in the war on reason.
Oh he's as LSE as they get; with a load of neurosis and everything LOL
Look at the way he talks he not only focuses on the central theme of things but like Te, he tries to see all the other factors of the story and how they integrate into the center, which I refer to as algorithmic thinking (putting together of what's going on and what's working); his thinking is very purposeful and his sentence formation flows very orderly unlike that of SEE.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GGismVlSVo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3AuQGaexiyU
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 12-30-2012 at 12:08 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I really want to teach you how to type sometimes; it's kind of redundant, probably and I'm sure Michael would agree, however I think people are worth the shot so here we go..
The most famously typed LSE, Arnold, and one of my least favorite people, for very obvious reasons, gives an interview here...noticed the flow of his speech, how smooth it is and how there are absolutely not stutters in thought (as in he doesn't remember to interject another thought but finishes one thought to the end)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlHc7r52g4Q
now observe LSI, Javier, his cuts his thoughts and goes back to a thought that he meant to make and then goes forward with a previous thought
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&fe...&v=9aw9lxZjFHY
This is one of the few things you should observe when you talk to someone who you ask question to in person.
http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...gnitive_Styles
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote