IXTj… LSI > LII; going by cog-styles, C–D seems prominent.
E1 or 6w5.
He's an ILI with a tendency to bleed Fi mobilising all over the place.
Ni Te > Ti Ne
I still think Ti-IXTj (maybe INTj > ISTj I'm not sure) E6 sp/so or sx/so or something else with so.
LII. I could probably be persuaded to see LSI but right now I don't.
6w5 most definitely. No opinion on instincts.
Well, Ti is there.
6w5/5w6 is obvious, leaning towards 6
I initially thought LSI when interviewing him for the first time on cam, LII is also possible but less likely. ILI doesn't make much sense IMO, just a very different style and energy from k0rp, cpig, other obvious ILIs.
Imo, I'm going to go with Ti-LII 6w5 sp/sx from what I've seen of you.
Invisible Jim... thank you for your expression of special interest. Afraid can't really contribute much, from our meeting I'd doubt Se ego, but I wouldn't heavily bet on it. I think I initially got the impression of you as possibly ILI, but was in no way fixed on this - honestly wouldn't be surprised if you were LII ILI SLI or LIE. I'll put £1.50 each way on ILI. My relative ignorance with regards to the e-type system prevents me from even guessing at that.
InvisibleJim, my dear, you are NiTe in every in every system, and I’m certain of it…. I think my method of “typing” people would only annoy you if I introduced it; I will however say this:
I have done extensive study in order to figure out my own type. I am NiTe/ILI and it is extremely difficult for me to find other people that are actually this type. I know this, because when I meet them, I don’t have to explain everything I say, because other ILIs just get it. The communication is clinical and without irrational crap, no matter what the topic is. I talk to several “NiTe” people on the web and you are one of three people I don’t need to explain myself to. I guess you could say this is a kind of intuitive “certainty” on my part….
w/ socionics type from semantics you come up as process + dynamic so Te-ILI is my guess. I don't remember seeing a single post where you would be explaning why something is the way it is, adopting a didactic tone and shelving information into categories - in other words, you would make for a poor dual for ExEs.
quasi identicals are fun to analyze in socionics
sometimes I imagine myself being an ILI and I really don't find a lot of differences between the two types
I guess I can see you as LII
truth to be told, you are much easier to type LII than some LIIs, but that's just MBTI remains and inconsistent thoughts I've collected over the years
My guess/conclusion/opinion/whatever is ILI-Te.
Static, merry, declaring, positivist, aristocratic, blah blah blah. LSI 6w5 sx/sp [ed: in examining that thread it appears I provided the lengthiest and most detailed analysis of your type out of anyone who responded.]
But yes, I vote now as him portraying valued Ti with subdued Te.
I agree with the LSI typing.