Do you think supervisor relations are more prone to unrequited love?
Do you think supervisor relations are more prone to unrequited love?
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
DJ she's not into you, give it up.
Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings
Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja
No (from experience)
I think they are prone to REQUITED love, then fights then breakup/divorce.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Supervision relations are interesting. The interaction usually ends up with the supervisee feeling as if he can't be himself to a large degree and thus becomes dependent on support from the supervisor. No matter how much the supervisor tries to make the supervisee become more independent, he keeps coming back for more. Eventually, prolonged relations result in psychological destruction, because the supervisor just wants the recipient to go away. And the supervisee won't because he can't: the vital functions and survival methods that he would have used for continuing existence on his own have been destroyed.
In essence, supervision is like a drug that causes extreme physical dependence.
duals may be more more prone to unrequited love because of the [ possibly ] higher statistical odds of one falling for the other. imo
Edit.
Last edited by xerx; 11-27-2013 at 12:46 AM.
the benefactor expects something that you cannot by any means give him (cause it's your polr) while he provides you with info from his ego functions. The supervisor doesn't expect anything in return as dual-seeking function. The presence of dual-seeking info is Benefit relations makes it all more devious.