Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Supervision relations and unrequited love?

  1. #1
    Feel God's Thunder Azure Flame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Jesus
    TIM
    Neon Ninja Phoenix
    Posts
    1,538
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Supervision relations and unrequited love?

    Do you think supervisor relations are more prone to unrequited love?
    Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings



    Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja

  2. #2
    fka lungs ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    13,171
    Mentioned
    678 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    no.

  3. #3

  4. #4
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,445
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    DJ she's not into you, give it up.

  5. #5
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    6,815
    Mentioned
    261 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DJ Arendee View Post
    Do you think supervisor relations are more prone to unrequited love?
    More prone than what?

    LSE
    1w2 so/sp 1-6-2
    Brilliand's Younger Sister
    Squishy's Older Sister

    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  6. #6
    Feel God's Thunder Azure Flame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Jesus
    TIM
    Neon Ninja Phoenix
    Posts
    1,538
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Director Abbie View Post
    More prone than what?
    non-supervisor relations
    Perfect<------------------------------------------------------------------------------>Loops and Tings



    Ambivert / Aggressor / Trailblazer / Nomad / Alpha Caretaker / Free Spirit / Kevlar Speed Demon / Ninja

  7. #7
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,834
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    No (from experience)

  8. #8
    Breaking stereotypes Suz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    On a chatbox diet
    TIM
    ESI maybe
    Posts
    6,485
    Mentioned
    170 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think they are prone to REQUITED love, then fights then breakup/divorce.
    Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx

  9. #9
    Eldanen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southeastern USA
    TIM
    ILI 5w4 sx/??
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Supervision relations are interesting. The interaction usually ends up with the supervisee feeling as if he can't be himself to a large degree and thus becomes dependent on support from the supervisor. No matter how much the supervisor tries to make the supervisee become more independent, he keeps coming back for more. Eventually, prolonged relations result in psychological destruction, because the supervisor just wants the recipient to go away. And the supervisee won't because he can't: the vital functions and survival methods that he would have used for continuing existence on his own have been destroyed.

    In essence, supervision is like a drug that causes extreme physical dependence.

  10. #10
    Feel God's Thunder Azure Flame's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    West Jesus
    TIM
    Neon Ninja Phoenix
    Posts
    1,538
    Mentioned
    42 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eldanen View Post
    Supervision relations are interesting. The interaction usually ends up with the supervisee feeling as if he can't be himself to a large degree and thus becomes dependent on support from the supervisor. No matter how much the supervisor tries to make the supervisee become more independent, he keeps coming back for more. Eventually, prolonged relations result in psychological destruction, because the supervisor just wants the recipient to go away. And the supervisee won't because he can't: the vital functions and survival methods that he would have used for continuing existence on his own have been destroyed.

    In essence, supervision is like a drug that causes extreme physical dependence.
    That's been my experience. I can't tell if its unhealthy behavior or supervision though.

  11. #11
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,599
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    duals may be more more prone to unrequited love because of the [ possibly ] higher statistical odds of one falling for the other. imo
    Capitalism is the belief that the rich don't work hard when they don't earn enough, and that the poor don't work hard when they earn too much.

  12. #12
    Eldanen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southeastern USA
    TIM
    ILI 5w4 sx/??
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xerx View Post
    duals may be more more prone to unrequited love because of the [ possibly ] higher statistical odds of one falling for the other. imo
    Introvert falls for extrovert? And extrovert is like "nah."?

  13. #13
    killer wolf lemontrees's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    emotionz
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,161
    Mentioned
    102 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Edit.

  14. #14
    xerx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    5,599
    Mentioned
    59 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eldanen View Post
    Introvert falls for extrovert? And extrovert is like "nah."?
    Introverted* men getting friend zoned over a perceived lack of agency is one way. Women find it unattractive, hence the whole "nice guy" phenomenon.

    * not just socionics introverts
    * socionics introverts can have agentive qualities;
    blah;
    blah;
    blah
    Last edited by xerx; 11-27-2013 at 12:46 AM.
    Capitalism is the belief that the rich don't work hard when they don't earn enough, and that the poor don't work hard when they earn too much.

  15. #15
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,422
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Eldanen View Post
    Supervision relations are interesting. The interaction usually ends up with the supervisee feeling as if he can't be himself to a large degree and thus becomes dependent on support from the supervisor. No matter how much the supervisor tries to make the supervisee become more independent, he keeps coming back for more. Eventually, prolonged relations result in psychological destruction, because the supervisor just wants the recipient to go away. And the supervisee won't because he can't: the vital functions and survival methods that he would have used for continuing existence on his own have been destroyed.

    In essence, supervision is like a drug that causes extreme physical dependence.
    This scenario sounds more like Benefit "unequal relations".
    Last edited by Amber; 01-03-2014 at 09:20 PM.

  16. #16
    Eldanen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Southeastern USA
    TIM
    ILI 5w4 sx/??
    Posts
    489
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AshSun View Post
    This scenario sound more like Benefit "unequal relations".
    I've noticed it to happen when one is the recipient in an asymmetric relation. Because of superid functions, your supervisor is partly your benefactor underneath, and your benefactor your supervisor. Does that make sense?

  17. #17
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,422
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    the benefactor expects something that you cannot by any means give him (cause it's your polr) while he provides you with info from his ego functions. The supervisor doesn't expect anything in return as dual-seeking function. The presence of dual-seeking info is Benefit relations makes it all more devious.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •