Excuse my english, I'm from sweden.
I don't know where to start, are there any questionnaires? If not, could someone bunch up some questions for me? I'm not familiar with socionics theory, I understand how it works though.
Thanks
Excuse my english, I'm from sweden.
I don't know where to start, are there any questionnaires? If not, could someone bunch up some questions for me? I'm not familiar with socionics theory, I understand how it works though.
Thanks
Ask jennifer. She holds the keys to socionics cognition.
You have to look and see which function you do, not the one you THINK you do or that you WANT to do or that you think is more admirable; the one that you DO do and the one that others see you doing. Or the ones that you are TOLD by others that you are without you thinking the process through and sticking to your guns like that person was god or something.
The functions are listed on this site:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
http://socionics.us/theory/information.shtml
http://socionics.us/works/semantics.shtml
http://socionics.us/works/socion2.shtml#1
http://socionist.blogspot.com/2006/1...revisited.html
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-20-2012 at 05:18 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Thanks for your static judgement, but it doesn't help in terms of giving me any Te. What you say to me comes off more condescending than helpful and not complimentary. I would prefer, "that works." Why? because well, that's Te; it observed my actions and thought out that that is a good way of doing the task and without such condescension as implying that otherwise I'm less helpful, less willing and able, which you do here in this post, literally is like a feeling of someone putting a knife in my gut. What you say is more of a judgement of me than on my attempt to do something a certain way. You're saying this is the best of your posts but you're saying it like this "this is the only good post you're unwilling, you've been unable, you've been unsuccessful, you've been incapable."
The way in which you say things to me don't work for me. I would rather you kindly stayed away. I don't like how you interact with me.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 09-20-2012 at 06:45 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
What are your "best" friends like?
What are the qualities you seek in people?
What are your best qualities?
Describe the perfect job, perfect holiday
What interests you about socionics?
Sincerely Yours,
Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.
The Rebel without a cause.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Hej!
Du måste läsa mera så att du kan se hur teorin fungerar i verkligheten. Det är det enda sättet att bestämma din typ. Iakttag mänskor, lär dig typbestämma andra, fundera på relationer. Socionics är en helhet, din egen typ får betydelse först när du förstår helheten, annars är den bara en simpel bokstavskombination.