Instinct Stackings and Socionics Types

[Clumsy]

Has anyone noticed any particular instinctual stackings being more common for specific Socionics types, or is this generally not the case?

[Gilly]

I have observed loose correlations between sx variants and Se/Ni types, sp variants and logical types, 7s an ExxPs, 8s and ExxJs, 1s and IJs, 4s and 9s with IxxPs, 5s with IxTx, assertive types and extroverts, withdrawn types and introverts, 2s and ethical types, and 6s with any type.

[Galen]

I've seen no correlation between instinct stacking and sociotype. As far as I can tell, the two systems can exist wholly independent of each other, as they don't really deal with overlapping areas of the supposed psyche.

[Gilly]

I've seen no correlation between instinct stacking and sociotype. As far as I can tell, the two systems can exist wholly independent of each other, as they don't really deal with overlapping areas of the supposed psyche.

Everything is connected...especially in the brain

[solid207]

I haven't noticed any correlation between instinct stacking and a particular sociotype. However, I do believe there's a strong tendency for certain stackings to be associated with subtypes in the DCNH system. I haven't analyzed it extensively and I'm sure there are exceptions, but the following correlations do seem to have some merit from my experience:

Dominant subtype--So/sp, Sx/sp (I think I've met some Sx/so and/or So/sx Dominants as well)
Creative subtype--Sx/so, So/sx
Normalizing subtype--Sp/so (sp/sx seems plausible as well, though I've encountered much more sp/so's)
Harmonizing subtype--Sp/sx, Sp/so

[epheme]

I haven't noticed any correlation between instinct stacking and a particular sociotype. However, I do believe there's a strong tendency for certain stackings to be associated with subtypes in the DCNH system. I haven't analyzed it extensively and I'm sure there are exceptions, but the following correlations do seem to have some merit from my experience:

Dominant subtype--So/sp, Sx/sp (I think I've met some Sx/so and/or So/sx Dominants as well)
Creative subtype--Sx/so, So/sx
Normalizing subtype--Sp/so (sp/sx seems plausible as well, though I've encountered much more sp/so's)
Harmonizing subtype--Sp/sx, Sp/so

Any opinions, observations on this? @silke @woofwoofl @point @Galen @Solaris or anyone else

[Galen]

Any opinions, observations on this? @silke @woofwoofl @point @Galen @Solaris or anyone else

1) DCNH is bad, m'kay
2) Even if it wasn't bad, I self-type as normalizing and I sure ain't no sp/so
3) Any sociotype can be any instinct stacking

[Olimpia]

There is a slight correlation between MBTI types and Instinctual Stackings.

http://www.projectevolove.com/educat...s#.VCAkIlatU2U

[Galen]

There is a slight correlation between MBTI types and Instinctual Stackings.

http://www.projectevolove.com/educat...s#.VCAkIlatU2U

This would be wonderful news if MBTI wasn't awful
Kinda shitty that the site relegates instinct stackings to mere dating compatibility (although it does work to that effect in a lot of cases)