...
Can't 'read" me.
...
Last edited by Hays; 04-25-2016 at 07:35 AM.
I can't read him. Sorry.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Let us declare him ESI. Why, why not?
Socionics -
the16types.info
Wait...what?
No, just the second sentence of OP confused me, imma see if I can type the person but the photos and video aren't good quality.
What type are you?
Socionics -
the16types.info
Looks like some religious nutty-boy.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I smell an LSE
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
That's what people tell me.Originally Posted by Shayley
The former, I have no trouble with the latter the more time I spend with a particular person or focus on, I know what they're going to do, what they're going to say and most importantly how to counter it.
It has came to this I just say "it is your cue" and person in question recites it like a play I wrote for him/her.
That's not a gift, it's nothing magical, anyone can do that. It only takes a bit of time to get to know someone and if that's the case, then that person is comfortable sharing with you, which is not bad at all. I wouldn't think about using such info against anyone who wouldn't do it to me first. As for scenarios, it's called predictability, that is, I know what to expect from such person. It's neither good nor bad, it just is.
Well, some films are predictable and some aren't at all. I prefer those with a good plot twist that leave me wanting to see it all. Same with people, I think.
Looks like a P types, I would say something like ESTp
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not very good typing people from afar, i need to observes him/her closely to know them better
He doesn't look like a person I'd get on with... I'd go with ESTp. I think S and T for sure, can't see any other option. But I might be wrong - I'm not good at typing online.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
