I felt envious that I don't have a thread about me and almost everyone else has one.
So there we go.
What do you think my type is?
Talk about me. You can also talk dirty about me I'm OK with that as long as I am the center of attention.
What's my type
I felt envious that I don't have a thread about me and almost everyone else has one.
So there we go.
What do you think my type is?
Talk about me. You can also talk dirty about me I'm OK with that as long as I am the center of attention.
I don't know your type, but I've seen a few of your posts and think you're hilarious and awesome.
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Extravert; "as long as you talk dirty about me I'm ok with that as long as I'm the center of attention."
Beautiful.
I wanna say Fe is close to your breast...how close Base or role.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
i think i like you so far. i also have a perception, warranted or not, of "self-typed ILI with cute/funny avatar, must be LII" lol
here is a questionnaire.
1. write a paragraph about your philosophical views.
2. analyze/describe the following picture:
3. tell me an anecdote involving yourself. i'd prefer humor, but whatever, it can be anything.
4. tell me if you're into erotic asphyxiation and why or why not.
ps. i make no guarantees that i'll be able to tell anything about your type from your answers, its not like they are magic type generators, just getting to know you and stuff.
1. My views are that I should do what I want unless it will get me into trouble, which is what most people do anyway. However I do not believe that life has any particular meaning outside of what we decide to ascribe to it. I have strong dislike for religion and esoteric bullshit and mysticism. If any of them held any truth we would not be witnessing people of various beliefs and cultures and upbringing trying living their lives in so similar manner and trying to achieve more or less the same things (love, friends, health). And that is why I don't hate religious people and people with beliefs that I find stupid in general - because I realize that on the inside we are all the same and that is just their way of rationalizing their meaningless existence. When I say existence is meaningless it might sound depressing to some but I find it fascinating that we kind of only have one shot at life and that we have the freedom (more or less) to do whatever we decide is right.
2. The picture is meaningless cause it has some sailor making out with some girl and city and volcano, but if I really have to analyze it I'd say that the sailor came home (there is a big river flowing through the city so he probably came with a boat) and he started making out with his girl and he hasn't seen her in so long that he came in his pants while making out.
3. You know ... I am trying really hard but I cannot think of anything that is worth mentioning. Most of the fun stuff related to me is talking and not doing.
4. I have never tried it but I guess I would and I think I'd like it. I think I know what I'll be doing tonight I just hope I don't end like Michael Hutchins. If I don't ever appear on the forum again you should know I probably died happy.
Extraverted Sensing Thinking. Ej temperament over Ep; Rational type because you try to ascribe meaning to something and you're not just presenting your observations of what you do.Originally Posted by Gravolez
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's an interesting interpretation
2. The picture is meaningless cause it has some sailor making out with some girl and city and volcano, but if I really have to analyze it I'd say that the sailor came home (there is a big river flowing through the city so he probably came with a boat) and he started making out with his girl and he hasn't seen her in so long that he came in his pants while making out.That's an interesting interpretation
You didn't have to jump to a rationalization, you could have done the second part first, which was sort of describe what's going on, but you're not describing it, you're making a story about it in sort of a dynamic movement; "he came come" "he started making out"
I would say as a static type, if I were to analyze it I would notice it's obvious qualities; There's an explosive romantic kiss above a city and the volcano represents the explosion or the magnitude of the romance. I pick things that describe the picture while you make a story out of the picture.
You're definitely a Rational Dynamic type. That of course only leaves one typebecause with
you would be observing the feelings outside of yourself, between the couple. At a long shot, you would be demonstrating
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
To be honest what you considered a demonstration of Fe in my first post was kind of a joke. I am saying this because I have had very little participation in this forum and jokes which I make related to my persona are not likely to be understood and also I wrote that fully aware that it is misleading, which was not fair but I thought it would sound fun (and it does. Who does not like jokes with sexual references
If anyone feels like they need more information they can ask me whatever questions they think will help them identify my type.
That's really not what I based my decision on. I just looked at what you're doing.To be honest what you considered a demonstration of Fe in my first post was kind of a joke. I am saying this because I have had very little participation in this forum and jokes which I make related to my persona are not likely to be understood and also I wrote that fully aware that it is misleading, which was not fair but I thought it would sound fun (and it does. Who does not like jokes with sexual references
If anyone feels like they need more information they can ask me whatever questions they think will help them identify my type.
So what do you think about his/her type.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Well the reasons are:
1. The ILI description fit perfectly and gave explanation for my weaknesses and strengths. Why I get frustrated in some situations (mostly social context which requires handling and grasp of emotional states) and thrive in others (being able to see potential development of events without much information). Why I lose interest in doing something as soon as I know how it is done and what is the idea behind it in terms of causality and development in time. Why I get motivated by learning new stuff and why I suck at smalltalk and it pisses me off how people talk before they think when the conclusion to which the smalltalk leads is often "obvious" or "irrelevant". Why certain type of girls, which I found too good for me were attracted to me and I was thinking that there's got to be some mistake (IEE and SEE). It explains why I find some people boring, other shallow and third plain stupid - now I have confirmation that indeed they are boring (EII), shallow (IEE) and stupid (EIE, ESE) to my standards, though I now realize I probably look the same way to them or other types. Now I am a bit more tolerant when I am in the mood for that, cause I don't care about most people. And so on.
2. No other description fits
I don't know if it's useful for typing me but at least I hope it's enjoyable
I am the singer.
I agree with SLI; his manner of approach is notbut rather preference towards
That's a confirm on that and I'm going to add him to my list.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I guess it could be explained like that.
I had no idea that the picture is supposed to lead you to my dual seeking information element, that's interesting.
However, about the picture analysis I think I used my ignoring Ne to come up with something stupid, cause I am really not into pointless guessing in terms of associations. Together with that (the moment I came up with some ideas) I unconsciously went for series of events (Ni) instead of a static description.
What do you think about my analysis
I don't think it's useful for typing you because the angle isn't right, the lighting isn't right.
That was great though, you're very talented. I enjoyed it very much. *paypals you some money for the show*
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Though I am stiff and I have no idea what to do on stage. I feel better with my guitar in front of me - it has a psychological effect of a barrier (kind of hiding me) and also it gives me something to do with my hands.
You're sure you're not some kind of Ne ego - ILE for example? I don't know much at this point so you can disregard this.
EDIT: Watched vid. Six mins or something - what is that crappy music?
Last edited by Absurd; 05-20-2012 at 01:11 PM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
