I made a video

[fairylights]

Now give me attention VI me ... or use whatever other typing methods you have at your disposal. Please and thanks.



Sorry about the sound quality, it's not great but hopefully not bad enough to deter anyone.

EDIT: Ha, I looked PISSED in the default screen capture on that video.

[woofwoofl]

Got through 1:12 so far; can't hear jack shit and I'm too tired to get the headphones, ESI's my call right now

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

I like how soft-spoken you are.

ISFj or IEI makes sense.

[Raver]

I'm going to go with EII based on this video primarily.

[Radio]

Se-ego. Not INFj.

ISFj > ISTj.

[Beautiful sky]

SEI, ESI or SEE

I can't confirm because I need a picture taken from the side with your hair back, please.

[Nowisthetime]

ESI harmonizing works.

Thanks for posting your video.

[fairylights]

So, since most people seem to be seeing ESI ... um, why?

ESI harmonizing works.

Thanks for posting your video.

Thanks for watching. Also ... ESI harmonizing? What is that?

SEI, ESI or SEE

I can't confirm because I need a picture taken from the side with your hair back, please.

Does this work?

[Saberstorm]

You talk very quietly. I cannot really hear you. I rule out Alpha and Beta.

[Beautiful sky]

ESI or SEI still are my top two choices

[Radio]

So, since most people seem to be seeing ESI ... um, why?

I'm not sure I can articulate it. One of the pointers was Ixxj temperament (low-energy, rigidity), and while the following isn't a rule of thumb, your expression defaults to dead-pan which is characteristic of Ixxj types more than other temperaments (as Ixxjs tend towards control and/or stability). Your eyes are a lot more grounded and present in the moment, indicating a certain focus of tangible aspects of the world, and even when you recall things and your eyes shoot upward (or downwards), they never recede out of focus as in a lot of Ne-egos I've noticed.

F > T is mostly based on your forum persona and how you operate primarily by making good relations and being friendly but that's just how it appears to me, it might not be how you view it.

---

VI is entirely relativistic so when you ask to explain something like this, I can only do it with reference to other people and their mannerisms.



Kimbra (Se-ISFj)



James Franco (Fi-ISFj)



Kat Dennings (Ne-INFj) and Michael Cera (Ne-INFj)

Here, for instance, I don't know if you can sense it, but to me, the former two are definitely a lot more physically present and deliberate about their gestures and movements than the latter two. Both Dennings and Cera are somewhat physically awkward and held back, like their postures are "suspended" rather than fully embodied (if that makes sense). It's a lot more obvious in Cera's case, I'm not sure why that is. Anyway, I don't see the same sort of airiness in you to classify you as an INFj or INTj, so ISFj or ISTj (taking you an Ixxj type) and I made my case for the former above already.

[fairylights]

You talk very quietly. I cannot really hear you. I rule out Alpha and Beta.

You rule out alpha and beta because I talk quietly? No offense, but that's not a very good reason. It's likely that a majority of introverts across different quadras would be the same way. But yeah, sorry about the sound, I'm a soft-spoken person and I didn't want to disturb my roommate. You can hear me fine if you use headphones though, I just checked.

Thanks, Radio. I read the description of the IxxJ temperament that you linked and yeah, it's a pretty good fit for me, IMO. On the other hand, most people in my written type me thread pegged me as an irrational. It's interesting that I've got pretty different responses based on my video than I did from my written responses.

[fairylights]

I'd like to get more opinions please.

[Absurd]

You sound a bit like Maritsa in vid, low key.

Anyway, roll with ESI.

[fairylights]

You sound a bit like Maritsa in vid, low key.

Oh lordy.

[The Ineffable]

LSE, I guess.

Socionics question: do you bully sexy chicks at school?

[fairylights]

LSE, I guess.

Socionics question: do you bully sexy chicks at school?

Nah. I don't bully people, and I like looking at hot chicks as much as anyone else.

[The Ineffable]

Nah. I don't bully people, and I like looking at hot chicks as much as anyone else.

Hmm... "anyone else". Much like "nobody cares". Fallacies like this betray rhetorical and interest-driven speech but it's interesting nevertheless... this is not necessarily a false statement, not dishonest at all, I may add. It is not "I like looking", but "I like looking *as*" [anyone else], which means it could be like or dislike, the audience would just naturally assume that liking to look at hot chicks is the common-sense, but that is not your problem anymore, we don't have to do so, this "anyone" can be actually anyone, even someone who is actually annoyed by those bimbos and in fact... even yourself. In this case it translates into "I like looking at hot chicks as much as I like looking at them", is it circular reasoning or just an elegant manner of refusing an answer to a too personal question? We don't know. Yet.

[fairylights]

Hmm... "anyone else". Much like "nobody cares". Fallacies like this betray rhetorical and interest-driven speech but it's interesting nevertheless... this is not necessarily a false statement, not dishonest at all, I may add. It is not "I like looking", but "I like looking *as*" [anyone else], which means it could be like or dislike, the audience would just naturally assume that liking to look at hot chicks is the common-sense, but that is not your problem anymore, we don't have to do so, this "anyone" can be actually anyone, even someone who is actually annoyed by those bimbos and in fact... even yourself. In this case it translates into "I like looking at hot chicks as much as I like looking at them", is it circular reasoning or just an elegant manner of refusing an answer to a too personal question? We don't know. Yet.

o_o

All I said was that I don't bully people and that hot chicks are nice to look at.

[willekeurig]

ESI would be my guess, too. Much for the same reasons as Radio, and you also remind me of one ESI I know.

[aixelsyd]

Gamma SF is my guess.

[Valkyrie]

ESI or SEI still are my top two choices

FiSe (ESI) seems right to me too.

[fairylights]

FiSe (ESI) seems right to me too.

You called me FiNe on another forum though.

[Valkyrie]

Yes... then I deleted that post soon after... ^^;
I've always been most certain about Fi, but I still can't say I know what the other function is.
But I've been noticing that your eyes are most similar to Michael Jackson's, which I'm starting to think is FiSe after all..
Umm.. hence FiSe "seems" right, to my present understanding. But again I'm not %100 sure..
My apologies for the confusion..

[Absurd]

LSE, I guess.

Socionics question: do you bully sexy chicks at school?

Bwahha, what the fuck?

[fairylights]

Yeah, I dunno. Maybe I look like an LSE and/or like I hate sexy girls.