Is this SLI or LSI?
Is this guy SLI or LSI? He could be something totally different. But anyway, this is my image of Delta...
Si + Te
He is presenting a set of instructions (Te) that is materially real and centered on the body (Si), with elements of valued Ne and Fi.
Delta? ST yes, perhaps LSE if not SLI.
Last edited by Saberstorm; 04-04-2012 at 06:19 AM.
Socionics -
the16types.info
That is him with other people.
Socionics -
the16types.info
not SLI.
why?
Socionics -
the16types.info
there is an abruptness to his behavior and an angularity to his movements that is totally uncharacteristic of SLI.
Yeah, he is a bit animated.
Socionics -
the16types.info
Shootem in the fuckin head and be done with it. There how's that for a method.
LSE-Si
But Saber, your rationale is totally flawed. Sets of instructions are not Te, and focusing on the body is not Si. This is really superficial type-logic.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I watched the whole video expecting him to say something intelligent and compelling because he obviously has a lot of knowledge in this area. However I was sorely disappointed.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
hmmm. LSE seems good to me. I need to hone my SLI detecting skills. thanks.
Socionics -
the16types.info
He's not LSE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So is he SEE?
Socionics -
the16types.info
SLI
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I agree with LSE-Si, but really, it's a soft call. LSEs and SLIs can be pretty similar sometimes.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
LSE will say hello to you when you walk into the room and won't look at you as though you're intruding on their place; they will tell you about things that you notice, the stories behind them, they are much more hospitable to new people than the quiet, reserved SLI. If you're a friend of both, then that would be hard to tell because an SLI is very warm to their close relations and look like they are catering to, pleasing their close relation.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
