Does anyone remember the quote from an LSE description, "high emotionality makes him an internally contradictory person" ????
Where is it from?
On LSE
Does anyone remember the quote from an LSE description, "high emotionality makes him an internally contradictory person" ????
Where is it from?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I tried it, but I think because I read a translation from the Russian, some of the sites that are in Russian may not be included in the search. So I can't find it. This problem is the result of my lack of good organization of the references I use.Originally Posted by k0rpsy
I have to try to find a way to improve this.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If you're at a loss for sources then I challenge you to spend a week just making shit up. See if anyone can tell the difference.
Found it!!!
Where's Jedi?
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...uality-LSE-EII
"Pragma and Eros: fire and ice, realistic calculations and passionate affection makes him an internally contradicted person."
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yes he is and no I'm not stalking him. When I take an "interest" in someone, it's usually to see if I want to build a relation with that person. It's not to stalk them. I may be one track minded, but I can only focus one at a time. I'm not a multi-tasking, multi-minder. I have a track record of focusing on one individual at a time and that also includes women, that doesn't mean I'm gay nor does it mean that I'm stalking them. Why can't you accept something different from you or the "norm"?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
no, he's not. If you bothered to actually understand HIM instead of projecting an image onto him, you'd understand that.
What an ego. Have you even checked to see if he's "interested" in building a relation with you, first?When I take an "interest" in someone, it's usually to see if I want to build a relation with that person.
can you be even more random and wrong in your attempts at pot-shots??Why can't you accept something different from you or the "norm"?
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
He's talking to me and responding back to my posts, joking and is curious and very nice. So in short, YES.
LOL
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You wanna be my gay lover? ^_^
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
)
