Last edited by soggy-flakes; 08-09-2009 at 01:49 AM.
What you say here is probably an argument for INTp (or maybe ISTp) rather than INTj. But I wouldn't consider it a very strong argument.I read the descriptions of these two functions and I find to be very unlike me yet I can sort of relate to although its not a particularly strong function.
These two functions are often badly described and misunderstood, so it would be useful if you could say precisely why you relate more to than to .
, LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
Originally Posted by implied
My understanding of this is still not great but from what I read, I do seem to associate more with then , not because necessarily describes me better, but that doesn't describe me much at all.INTjs, how do these two feeling functions play out in your lives?
It can be said that I'm inclined to these sorts of things
But the seeming lack of these things actually cause trouble in my lifethe skill to find individual approach to the groups of people, to play "on the necessary strings" of human passions.
sensitiveness, drops in the moods, fervency, fanaticism on a global scale.
Control of emotionalism and power engineering of the associations.
artistic taste (entire spectrum of intonations, expressive pauses, significant views, rich mimicry) and intrigues
Like I said, my understanding of all of this is rudimentary, so if this all comes out sounding like rubbish, then please disregardthe skill to understand, to estimate interrelations between themselves and by another person.
the rules of behavior, accepted in the relations between the concrete people.
the emotional estimation of its relation - sympathy, antipathy, confidence, admiration and so forth, etc. - to another person, his open expression
tendency toward the humanist ideals - philanthropy, mercy, good, pity, warm contact, friendship and so forth, etc
generally - the attitude of close people, ethical interaction with the familiar people, the morals of the connect together people.
All Hail The Flying Spaghetti Monster
the difference between INTj and INTp is their enthusiasm (Fe).
INTps are realistic/skeptical about ideas which makes them seem pessimistic
INTjs are enthusiastic about ideas which make them optimistic
are you over-the-top in you interaction with others, or passive?
I think i phrased it wrong
Anyway, you are INTj
Do you remeber i sent you that PM
you chose Si over Ni as describing you better, which means you are INTj
i understand. i was just saying yesterday in the chat you mention 'established norm' to an INTj and its over. you're not gonna get the best response because it's empassioned.Originally Posted by soggy-flakes
so its like.. you get into distinctions of moral codes that are .. not very distinctive or useful.
I've noticed that INTjs place a heavy reliance on proving something to themself.
An INTjs spiritual beliefs are based on logical arguments, whereas an INTps beliefs are not.
The opposite is true in most cases.Originally Posted by gaypog
fatti non foste a viver come bruti ma per seguir virtute e canoscenza
Yes you are INTj.
I wouldn't say 5000 years, but rather the non-immediate future.
how so?Originally Posted by FDG
i think i am confused about this aspect of intps and intjs. I think what gaypog says is true for me.
FDG is wrong.
Also, i think INTps are more likely to submit to peer pressure than INTjs
I think it has more to do with hidden agenda