Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Life Personality System

  1. #1
    In Transition Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,702
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default Life Personality System

    I have made my own typology system based on what I have noticed life is about. It may not be politically correct, but its the truth. Also, unlike other type systems, certain types are actually better than others.

    Intelligent ---------------------------------Dull
    Organized ---------------------------------Chaotic
    Dominant ---------------------------------Submissive
    Creative ----------------------------------Grounded
    Socially Suave ----------------------------Socially Awkward
    Good -------------------------------------Evil

    So if someone possesed all the traits to the left, they would be known as IODCSG. If someone possessed all the traits to the right they would be known as DCSGAE. Most of us are quite balanced, but we all lean in one direction or another.
    Last edited by Raver; 02-21-2012 at 04:56 AM.
    "Nothing happens until the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change."

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-4w5-9w1

  2. #2
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ok

  3. #3
    In Transition Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,702
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    ok
    "Nothing happens until the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change."

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-4w5-9w1

  4. #4
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    6,724
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your system is dull, socially awkward, and evil. I'm not sure about the others.

    ESTj
    1w2 sp/so 1-2-6
    Brilliand's Younger Sister
    Squishy's Older Sister

    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  5. #5
    Currently God Brilliand's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nevada
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    4,246
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Dull" should be renamed to "Stupid". At first I thought it meant "Boring".

    How do relationships work in this typology?



    LII-Ne

    "Come to think of it, there are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and the Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare!"
    - Blair Houghton

    Johari

  6. #6
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm ICSCSAG type.

    The Intelligent, Chaotic, Submissive, Creative, Socially Awkward, Good type.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    135
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Amen! I think I have a bit of a middle ground between dominant and submissive. Though I feel very blinded with dominance... it's a high... but when everyone is looking at you... no time to scan the others. )-:

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default


  9. #9
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,621
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    IOSGAX, i think.

    now what?

  10. #10
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,337
    Mentioned
    210 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I suppose typing some parts of this can only really be done based on relativeness/interactions.

    For example, whether a person is considered intelligent or dull would depend largely on who you're asking, and what their criteria for it is.

    Another example, dominance/submission are actually generally based on the particular relationship, or even a particular activity. A person can easily be dominant to some people, submit to other people, fight for dominance with yet other people, try to submit to someone's who's trying to submit to them. And even be dominant in certain situations, while being willing to submit in other situations.

    While yes, the OP did say that we can be both, but our typing would lean us to one way over another, ..is it an accurate dominant typing if the typee is in 50.5% situations where they are 50.5% dominant? Should they be held to the same expectations, and descriptions of a person who is closer to 90% situations where they are 90% dominant?



    If I were to try typing myself based on this system, I'd probably wind up with XcXXA(?)G.
    (Though if the criteria for Good involves a lot of caretaking type behaviors, I'd more likely fall into X there, too.)
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  11. #11
    Robot Assassin Pa3s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    Ne-LII, 5w6
    Posts
    3,648
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    When will the camps for those worthless DCSGAEs be ready?
    „Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
    – Arthur Schopenhauer

  12. #12
    In Transition Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,702
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BulletsAndDoves View Post
    I'm ICSCSAG type.

    The Intelligent, Chaotic, Submissive, Creative, Socially Awkward, Good type.
    I would classify myself as the same type.

    Quote Originally Posted by Brilliand View Post
    "Dull" should be renamed to "Stupid". At first I thought it meant "Boring".

    How do relationships work in this typology?
    I just did not want there to be to be too many Ss.


    Well, I would say that certain traits must be similar and other traits have no effect.

    So Intelligent and Dull, Socially Suave and Awkward, Good and Evil types would not get along.

    However, Chaotic and Organized, Dominant and Submissive, Creative and Grounded types could get along.


    Quote Originally Posted by anndelise View Post
    I suppose typing some parts of this can only really be done based on relativeness/interactions.

    For example, whether a person is considered intelligent or dull would depend largely on who you're asking, and what their criteria for it is.

    Another example, dominance/submission are actually generally based on the particular relationship, or even a particular activity. A person can easily be dominant to some people, submit to other people, fight for dominance with yet other people, try to submit to someone's who's trying to submit to them. And even be dominant in certain situations, while being willing to submit in other situations.

    While yes, the OP did say that we can be both, but our typing would lean us to one way over another, ..is it an accurate dominant typing if the typee is in 50.5% situations where they are 50.5% dominant? Should they be held to the same expectations, and descriptions of a person who is closer to 90% situations where they are 90% dominant?



    If I were to try typing myself based on this system, I'd probably wind up with XcXXA(?)G.
    (Though if the criteria for Good involves a lot of caretaking type behaviors, I'd more likely fall into X there, too.)
    I agree with you that there is a lot of grey area and that people are not necessarily black or white. Though you could make that argument for any type system including Socionics. Though I guess you can use X if you are almost evenly split, but it has to be something you are truly 50/50 with.
    Last edited by Raver; 02-21-2012 at 05:46 PM.
    "Nothing happens until the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change."

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-4w5-9w1

  13. #13
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,321
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Truth View Post
    I have made my own typology system based on what I have noticed life is about. It may not be politically correct, but its the truth. Also, unlike other type systems, certain types are actually better than others.

    Intelligent ---------------------------------Dull
    Organized ---------------------------------Chaotic
    Dominant ---------------------------------Submissive
    Creative ----------------------------------Grounded
    Socially Suave ----------------------------Socially Awkward
    Good -------------------------------------Evil
    Intelligent, chaotic, submissive, creative, used to be socially awkward but now a lot more suave, good.

  14. #14
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,231
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    And would anyone willing choose the "Dull" type?
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  15. #15
    . willekeurig's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    1,512
    Mentioned
    70 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    IXXCXX
    Quote Originally Posted by 1981slater View Post
    Axis of Evil: Iran, Iraq, North Korea and Agarina
    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan
    Agarina does not like human beings; she just wants a pretty boy toy.
    Johari Nohari

  16. #16
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,337
    Mentioned
    210 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Simon Ssmall View Post
    And would anyone willing choose the "Dull" type?
    I chose X on that one.
    Cuz I think the answer to that one woud depend on who was doing the typing.
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  17. #17
    In Transition Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    3,702
    Mentioned
    92 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    I guess I should point out now that I do not take this system seriously. I just wanted to know what you guys thought of it.
    "Nothing happens until the pain of staying the same outweighs the pain of change."

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-4w5-9w1

  18. #18
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I like this. I like it a lot.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •