okay, fine maybe I'm LSI

[Joy]

lsdfhdshvs;akdjvndjskvn;akjsdnvd;skjvkjdfvbjkafdnv bda

[aixelsyd]

[Leader]

uuum...hmmm...def ISTX

[Jenna]

ur LSE stfu


(but really, LSI? No)

[squark]

no. you're not.

[717495]

I think ESE-Si is right.

[krieger]

I think ESE-Si is right.

go wash your mouth with soap.

[Joy]

I've known too many ESE's to begin to think I could ever possibly be one. My Fe and Fi suck ass. And their Ni (and Ti, and.... ???) makes me want to do something violent with forks. They seem so backwards to me. Yet they get the job done. I'm baffled.

[Joy]

and I love it when they invariably say "I should have listened to you". and I'm not usually a sore winner.

[717495]

I just mean you remind me a lot of ESE-Sis I've known, which is different in your experience. I think Si perception is more interesting and evocative than Se anyway, so no offense intended.

[Joy]

I just mean you remind me a lot of ESE-Sis I've known, which is different in your experience. I think Si perception is more interesting and evocative than Se anyway, so no offense intended.

none taken. quite the opposite. just sayin... my day to day experience is one ethical blunder after another. my life experience, intuitive (gung ho) blunders. Totally ST.

[Joy]

I can also be extremely impulsive though. In a "calculated risk" sort of way. Or a "oh fuck it, I can't just not do nothing" sort of way.

[Absurd]

You sure you're not E3 like Mountain Dew?

[Gilly]

I can also be extremely impulsive though. In a "calculated risk" sort of way. Or a "oh fuck it, I can't just not do nothing" sort of way.

Sounds Ej enough to me.

LSE-Si 3w4 sp/sx.

[FDG]

IxTx type? Forget it...

[Gilly]

IxTx type? Forget it...

Yeah I have no clue what the fuck she is thinking.

[Lotus]

i really like this EIE guy right now so i'm going to switch my type to LSI too.

YaY dualitY no matter what tYpe You are!

[DividedsGhost]

huh.

[Kim]

Dj's identical?

[Jenna]

I believe she still thinks he is ESI.

[The Ineffable]

A LSI doesn't just say "ok, fine, maybe". Especially "maybe". I feel you're on the wrong track .

[Joy]

I've been casually considering LSI here and there for a bit now, but all of these topics I posted last night were pretty much just born of long pent up frustration at the end of a bad night. And too much to drink.

There is actually an EIE guy that I'm friends with and we've been hanging out more lately. We've always clicked really well, but I wouldn't go so far as to say we're duals.

[Gilly]

I've been casually considering LSI here and there for a bit now, but all of these topics I posted last night were pretty much just born of long pent up frustration at the end of a bad night. And too much to drink.

There is actually an EIE guy that I'm friends with and we've been hanging out more lately. We've always clicked really well, but I wouldn't go so far as to say we're duals.

Have you noticed that your type changes virtually always coincide with being attracted or somehow drawn to a man, and that you always retype as their dual? Seriously, this is some truly shameless BS unless you are just totally unaware of what you are doing to yourself.

[Joy]

Have you noticed that your type changes virtually always coincide with being attracted or somehow drawn to a man, and that you always retype as their dual? Seriously, this is some truly shameless BS unless you are just totally unaware of what you are doing to yourself.

What I'm saying is that my friendship with him makes me think it's LESS likely that I'm LSI, not more likely.

[Gilly]

What I'm saying is that my friendship with him makes me think it's LESS likely that I'm LSI, not more likely.

So why the thread

[Korpsy Knievel]

I'm wondering why anyone cares.

[golden]

Joy: Why not just pick a type for yourself and stick with it, and change everyone else's types instead. The supposed EIE guy you like--he could be anything you want!

[Joy]

I admire him as a person, scientist, and businessman. I value him as a friend. He's not the reason I was thinking I might be a different type. He's part of the reason I don't think I'm LSI. As I was saying.

[Joy]

And what's the purpose of picking a type and sticking to it and then changing your typing of other people if something's going on? I'm open to being wrong about anyone's type, but some people's types are much more clear than others. He's a clear cut EIE.

[golden]

It wuz uh joke.

[Gilly]

I'm wondering why anyone cares.

I care because she's a willing target for my pent up scathing negativity as long as I can wrap it in something that sounds constructive.

[Joy]

I care because she's a willing target for my pent up scathing negativity as long as I can wrap it in something that sounds constructive.

yeah... you're not fooling anyone, hence the "no one cares about your angst" or whatever post a while back.

and.... you don't have to have pent up negativity you know...

[Krig the Viking]

okay, fine. maybe I'm LSI.

Interesting. That was my V.I. typing of you a while ago. Not saying that proves anything, but it's interesting.

[Absurd]

Have you noticed that your type changes virtually always coincide with being attracted or somehow drawn to a man, and that you always retype as their dual? Seriously, this is some truly shameless BS unless you are just totally unaware of what you are doing to yourself.

Refer to korpsey's magnificent Jung analysis of identification thread.

[The Ineffable]

Interesting. That was my V.I. typing of you a while ago. Not saying that proves anything, but it's interesting.

You're so Intuitive Irrational. Such a pity you've joined the dark side.

[Absurd]

You're so Intuitive Irrational. Such a pity you've joined the dark side.

Haha!

[Krig the Viking]

"You're so Intuitive Irrational. Such a pity you've joined the dark side," said the obvious LSI.

[Absurd]

Krig, you don't mind I ask you a very important question?

[The Ineffable]

Krig, we are both either Irrational (IMO) or Rational (IYO). We could work together to find a common framework, even if partial, ours are currently upside-down relative to one another in certain aspects, primarily the understanding of Ne and Ni and apparently some others, like J/P. That is unacceptable. But because our apparently irreconciliable positions, we could use some mediators, I propose Azeroffs and Pa3s, what do you think? I picked them because the seem to talk your language, at the same time their knowledge being in agreement with mine in these sensitive aspects I was talking about.

I see another possibly good solution, to talk one-on-one (PM or something); in my experience it happens to agree with ILI () much more when we talk individually than in a social context. I just don't have that much time and patience, discussions with ILIs are looong and tedious.

[Pa3s]

But because our apparently irreconciliable positions, we could use some mediators, I propose Azeroffs and Pa3s, what do you think?

Alright, let's settle this dispute once and for all. We'll meet at sunrise by the old graveyard, I'll bring the pistols. Everyone takes 10 steps, turns around and shoots. And don't you try to cheat, Ineffable.