Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 41 to 80 of 151

Thread: Quasi-Identical Relations: Stories and Experiences

  1. #41
    Suomea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    TIM
    ILE-Ti
    Posts
    1,054
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    My brother is my quasi-identical.

    I think the best way to put it is -- very impressed by his abilities, while at the same time thinking he's got his priorities all wrong.
    Yeah, I think this sums up my impression of ENTj's too. Impressive abilities, just have their priorities a little wrong....: )
    Suomea

  2. #42

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yes... actually... that does seem to be an accurate description for me too but i doubt that the INTp feels that my abilities are impressive.

  3. #43
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    My brother is my quasi-identical.

    I think the best way to put it is -- very impressed by his abilities, while at the same time thinking he's got his priorities all wrong.
    almost like that with ENFps... I admire how easily they try new things. But I also totally look down on them for lacking any ISTj traits.

    me: "HAHA, maybe that's because you're so old!" (knowing she's 3 years older than me)
    ENFp: " ..."
    me: "... I was joking. you're not that much older. And definitely not old." (thinking "OMG, you can't even take such a comment. You're so weak.")

    An ISTj would say something like, "I'm older and wiser, you're just young and stupid." and then I'd say "Heeeeyyyy! No I'm not. ".
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  4. #44
    Creepy-Cyclops

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat View Post
    My brother is my quasi-identical.

    I think the best way to put it is -- very impressed by his abilities, while at the same time thinking he's got his priorities all wrong.
    Oh yes. My brother not my quasi-identical, but i've found this very much with people i've known. It can become rather frustrating at close interaction for both parties concerned.

  5. #45

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    2,916
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My dad is my quasi-identical.
    I don't have much to relate because we don't talk much. He hates it that I'm rude to my mom.
    But we get along way better compared to my mom and I.
    INTp
    sx/sp

  6. #46
    Memory of Tomorrow Reuben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oh baby, baby, baby
    TIM
    No idea
    Posts
    1,927
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My bro is my quasi, EII. When I was young I always fought with him over how to play and what to play. And I've always considered myself inferior to him in regards to lego-making skills. Though my designs were always highly original, his was much better organized and had nicer colours. In most fight, I'm the instigator. We get into fights when I want to do something new that he doesn't want to do, and I being the younger one, was rather dependent on him to go first before I follow, but he usually never takes the initiative, and I interpret that being a coward. So I always get angry at him, and most of the time end up playing with that new thing alone.

    When we grew older we became slightly closer, and I realized that there were times when he was in a good mood and wanted to talk, but I wasn't, and there were also times when I was a good mood and wanted to talk, but he wasn't. The dynamics are highly unsynchronized. However there are times when we both were happy and high at once, and there were also times when we were both low, and those were the times when we could relate. Sometimes we depend on each other on work, because we're always able to see the things the other could not. He helped me with science, I helped him with humanities. He's better than me in art, but I in music.

    I usually think that he's way better off than me, in that he's smarter, he can function more efficiently, he's always the good boy, studies hard and always does well. Never gets into troubles with classmates or girls and stuff. Heck, he's never had a girlfriend for all I know, and probably only had one or two crushes throughout his college years. I on the other hand am the opposite. I get into trouble with girls, do badly because I hate studying, and usually fall into depression because of the above. But somehow I think I am supposed to be better than him, just under performing. Or perhaps jut better in other areas.

    Sometimes I just hate his apparently higher ethics. Other times I hate his cowardliness, and yet other times I just get pissed at his seeming coldness. But I know that things will always get better despite the fight, and that I am for sure.

    I still think he's great though, despite the negativity of some of this post. There are always good times and bad times with your quasi. I recently met this INFj gal. Things seem to be going great now, though I don't think it'll go anywhere because she's quite conservative. However it is great so far, though maybe things may get slightly worse when we get closer, but it'll also get better. It's just highly unstable I suppose. Hopefully mutual attraction can get past the quasi barrier more often than not.
    She is wise
    beyond words
    beautiful within
    her soul
    brighter than
    the sun
    lovelier than
    love
    dreams larger
    than life
    and does not
    understand the
    meaning of no.
    Because everything
    through her, and in her, is
    "Yes, it will be done."


    Why I love LSEs:
    Quote Originally Posted by Abbie
    A couple years ago I was put in charge of decorating the college for Valentine's Day. I made some gorgeous, fancy decorations from construction paper, glue, scissors, and imagination. Then I covered a couple cabinets with them. But my favorite was the diagram of a human heart I put up. So romantic!

  7. #47
    Creepy-male

    Default Living with a Quasi-identical parent

    So, I'm an ILE, living with my SLI mother. The atmosphere is super.

    However, my LIE father worries (by which I mean, vomits torrents of in my hand) that "I'm not taking school seriously".

    Let's look at the bigger picture, though.

    1) Learned helplessness from my being repeatedly shot down and publicly burnt at the cross.
    2) Unvalued translating to "doesn't care" (on the Gamma end) versus "is flexible" (on the Alpha/Delta end).
    3) General lack of communication between the Alpha/Delta end (mother and her side of the family) and Beta/Gamma end (Dad and his side of the family).

    My question is, then, knowing that both my father and I essentially speak in Swahili to eachother, will being put in an environment get me "charged up" and "productive"?

    IMO, I'm just giving him, and his opinion, far too much license, and the situation will just get worse for me if I put myself in a world which is clearly not mine.

    The next question then, is, "Why don't I care, and how do I stimulate myself?" Though, frankly, at the current level of cruising, I'm doing far better than I really need to be, so why push myself?

  8. #48
    IEI- UK IEI's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Quasi Identical Relations?

    So just finished interacting with someone and I'm wondering if we are experiencing a Quasi interaction. Would be interested to hear views....

    Initially I thought we were going to be great friends but I have ended up really disappointed. I am sitting here trying to figure out what went wrong.

    We ended up arguing different ways to do something. I felt like this person wasn't listening to what I was saying (kept interrupting me and I had been listening to his argument for ages!). He just kept repeating old ground that had already been covered (as if I didn't get it the first time) and kept missing the key issues.

    He kept giving long detailed explanations over and over and over again. When I asked if he got my points and recognised that we had to do something about them he would agree then we agreed a way forward and half an hour later he was off doing something else and seemed to have forgotton what we agreed. I reminded him of our conversation and had to start making my points all over again.

    I have just extended the olive branch to try and smooth things over and 2 minutes later regretted doing it due to a cheeky comment.

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,848
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That could easily be INFj. I always identify them through the hypocritical self righteousness / self serving morals. But they also seem to shut down thoughts / opinions which they don't agree with very pre-emptively.

  10. #50
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IEI View Post

    He kept giving long detailed explanations over and over and over again.
    Sorry, not EII. Ideas not details.

    Could be a STj type instead...possible.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  11. #51
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If you're certain about NF, I'd say contrary over quasi, though both are possible. Are you sure about NF?

  12. #52
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,848
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Sorry, not EII. Ideas not details.

    Could be a STj type instead...possible.
    Here is a good example of an INFj shutting down something way too soon.

  13. #53
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratXII View Post
    Here is a good example of an INFj shutting down something way too soon.
    Because of that damn Ne
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  14. #54
    wants to be a writer. silverchris9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,072
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, I agree with Aiss: go contrary if you're sure of NF. But that sounds a lot more like a T type. I'd say consider LIE, but LIEs don't seem prone to snarky comments. Otherwise, look at Delta STs (LSE, especially, as the description sounded vaguely EJ) and maybe Alpha NTs.
    Not a rule, just a trend.

    IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.

    Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...

    I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.

  15. #55
    redbaron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    9,315
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    sounds.... really annoying.
    IEI-Fe 4w3

  16. #56
    IEI- UK IEI's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratXII View Post
    hypocritical self righteousness.
    Ding ding ding ding.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Sorry, not EII. Ideas not details.

    Could be a STj type instead...possible.
    Details were about an idea, kept repeating the idea in a heck of a lot of detail.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aiss View Post
    If you're certain about NF, I'd say contrary over quasi, though both are possible. Are you sure about NF?
    Well he claims to be NF (MBTI) but I have doubts

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratXII View Post
    Here is a good example of an INFj shutting down something way too soon.


    Quote Originally Posted by silverchris9 View Post
    Yeah, I agree with Aiss: go contrary if you're sure of NF. But that sounds a lot more like a T type. I'd say consider LIE, but LIEs don't seem prone to snarky comments. Otherwise, look at Delta STs (LSE, especially, as the description sounded vaguely EJ) and maybe Alpha NTs.
    Could be LIE as he tried to tell me how to do something really basic that I clearly know how to do. My response "I know what I'm doing" Although it wasn't like "here is the most efficient way of doing this" more "you're clearly and idiot and only here to be bossed around by me".

    Quote Originally Posted by redbaron View Post
    sounds.... really annoying.
    Yeah I'm still peeved about it

  17. #57
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    S=Data.
    N=Ideas

    as an N type, we can't remember or store a lot of data/details, we can record them in some place and put them together in writing...
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  18. #58
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IEI View Post
    Could be LIE as he tried to tell me how to do something really basic that I clearly know how to do. My response "I know what I'm doing" Although it wasn't like "here is the most efficient way of doing this" more "you're clearly and idiot and only here to be bossed around by me".
    By this description alone, LSE sounds plausible, attitude notwithstanding. LIE supervises IEI, so it's a valid possibility as well, especially in context of trying and failing to be the boss. Do you feel supervised (i.e. you value his input but it seems to you that no matter what you do, he doesn't value yours), or are you equally annoyed with each other?

    Another thing is that I'm not sure how Te-base could be mistyped for NF in MBTI. I'd sooner look towards SFs in this case, or maybe even alpha NTs, if not NFs.
    Last edited by Aiss; 06-09-2010 at 09:32 PM.

  19. #59
    take a second of me sarinana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Originally from black hole, currently residing in Jupiter
    TIM
    EIE-Ni
    Posts
    1,145
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IEI View Post
    So just finished interacting with someone and I'm wondering if we are experiencing a Quasi interaction. Would be interested to hear views....

    Initially I thought we were going to be great friends but I have ended up really disappointed. I am sitting here trying to figure out what went wrong.

    We ended up arguing different ways to do something. I felt like this person wasn't listening to what I was saying (kept interrupting me and I had been listening to his argument for ages!). He just kept repeating old ground that had already been covered (as if I didn't get it the first time) and kept missing the key issues.

    He kept giving long detailed explanations over and over and over again. When I asked if he got my points and recognised that we had to do something about them he would agree then we agreed a way forward and half an hour later he was off doing something else and seemed to have forgotton what we agreed. I reminded him of our conversation and had to start making my points all over again.

    I have just extended the olive branch to try and smooth things over and 2 minutes later regretted doing it due to a cheeky comment.
    haha I am EIE and this sounds like my relationship with IEE ex boyfriend. And it's sooo sad because everything seemed so great in the beginning.
    Last edited by sarinana; 06-09-2010 at 11:38 PM.
    Sincerely Yours,

    Beyond the clouds. Beyond the sun.

    The Rebel without a cause.

  20. #60
    jughead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    NC
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    899
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    "That could easily be INFj. I always identify them through the hypocritical self righteousness / self serving morals. But they also seem to shut down thoughts / opinions which they don't agree with very pre-emptively. "
    How do you identify ISFj?

  21. #61
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    S=Data.
    N=Ideas

    as an N type, we can't remember or store a lot of data/details, we can record them in some place and put them together in writing...
    wrong.

    N=general theme

    S=what can be perceived through the senses

    data is a T thing.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  22. #62
    IEI- UK IEI's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    339
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some more info

    I have decided to distance myself from this person and I really regret telling him a whole bunch of personal stuff about myself. He seems to be using it against me now (he brought something I said up in a meeting and it was just to make me look stupid) Oddly I keep forgetting this and he tricks me into trusting him again then I remember he can't be trusted and pull away again.

    I wish he would just leave me alone.

    Still can't work out his type.

  23. #63
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by IEI View Post
    I have decided to distance myself from this person and I really regret telling him a whole bunch of personal stuff about myself. He seems to be using it against me now (he brought something I said up in a meeting and it was just to make me look stupid) Oddly I keep forgetting this and he tricks me into trusting him again then I remember he can't be trusted and pull away again.
    Exact reason I avoid sharing information with people as long as I can get away with it.

    NTR, I suppose.

  24. #64
    Pierreuse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    EIE-Se
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Stories on married quasi-identicals

    Can anyone give me any stories on married quasi identicals and how it turned out or how happy the people were in rhe relationship?? Is it a good relationship for marriage/couples? So far what I've read about quasis says it's not the best, but I'm looking for real examples since obviously type isn't everything and I don't know any couples who are quasis but I'm really curious. Thanks.
    Dandelion Fluff Upon a Spoon

  25. #65
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Bad relationship; full of misunderstandings, miscommunication.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  26. #66
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,809
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Of course, Maritsa has no experience to draw upon, because everyone she dates is an LSE. Then the relationship ends and they magically change type

  27. #67
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by InvisibleJim View Post
    Of course, Maritsa has no experience to draw upon, because everyone she dates is an LSE. Then the relationship ends and they magically change type
    The level of interaction can be assessed in a simple conversation; you don't have to have intimate relationships with the person to tell if you're going to have good communication with them. Mike is LSE. He probably changed his type back for various dumb reasons. One of which is to make me feel upset. Another is to establish his sense of "autonomy"


    All are stupid reasons.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  28. #68
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,809
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    The level of interaction can be assessed in a simple conversation; you don't have to have intimate relationships with the person to tell if you're going to have good communication with them.
    What? That is an incredibly superficial and prejudiced way of understanding people.

  29. #69
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by InvisibleJim View Post
    What? That is an incredibly superficial and prejudiced way of understanding people.
    Really, what do you say during sex that would make you type them better?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  30. #70
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,809
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Really, what do you say during sex that would make you type them better?
    How do you think that a short conversation will evaluate a) their type and b) how good the sex will be.

  31. #71
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,952
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by InvisibleJim View Post
    How do you think that a short conversation will evaluate a) their type and b) how good the sex will be.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  32. #72
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,022
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pierreuse View Post
    Can anyone give me any stories on married quasi identicals and how it turned out or how happy the people were in rhe relationship?? Is it a good relationship for marriage/couples? So far what I've read about quasis says it's not the best, but I'm looking for real examples since obviously type isn't everything and I don't know any couples who are quasis but I'm really curious. Thanks.
    The functional impact is on the unconscious side (ID). SEi + ESI for example SiFe + FiSe. So there is no immidiate threat to polr for example. It's just confusing and very unfulfilling imo. It can seem like you have a lot in common in the beginning, but everything is just talked about in a way that the other person can't process. I think that some descriptions say that partners ultimately realize that the relationship was a waste of time. That's exactly my experinece even though it sounds harsh. I've dated 2 quasis, both for several months or even years. And my mom is my quasi. About the PoLR: because your quasi sucks at handling your polr you might get irritated at their mistakes and try to take command of you own polr to correct them. That is frustrating. Everyone need a person who has good command of your polr to cover for you.

    I don't know any quasi couples. It would be interesting to see though. Quasi feels like an unusual and strange relationship.

    The advice for quasi couples who want to make it work in spite of everything is to talk less and do more, explore the world together and so on. Sounds like the best advice for this couple.
    Last edited by Nowisthetime; 03-31-2013 at 04:34 AM.

  33. #73
    epheme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    TIM
    9w1 sx/sp
    Posts
    425
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    My best friend (EIE) has been dating his Quasi-Identical (IEE) for two years.

    Here is my perception of their relationship since I have to hear about it, ALL THE TIME, from both of them.

    -They are very competitive with each other, and get offended if they think the other “one-upped” them. Although, they are gay so maybe this is common in male gay relationships, I dunno?
    -They are always censoring themselves when in the presence of the other, for fear of being judged. And they are constantly offending each other, somehow, even when it is clear to me that no malice was intended.
    -Neither feels that their life goals are being supported or that they are being supported even in everyday things.
    -IEE wants to spend every waking hour with EIE. This makes EIE feel smothered and IEE feel neglected. (Probably due to sx-first VS so-first)

    Basically the main problem is that they are living two different relationships. They want completely different things out of it and just don’t get each other.

    They broke up four times last week.

  34. #74
    Pierreuse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    EIE-Se
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks, this is all interesting. I for one really like my quasis and I don't think it would be impossible to imagine dating one. I had a bad relationship with one of my quasis a long time ago but now one of my best friends is my quasi. My mom and brother are quasi-identicals though and they basically hate each other. I usually find my quasi's thoughts, views, and lifestyle to be interesting, refreshing and easy to understand even though they're not ones I would necessarily adopt.
    Dandelion Fluff Upon a Spoon

  35. #75
    epheme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Columbus, OH, USA
    TIM
    9w1 sx/sp
    Posts
    425
    Mentioned
    29 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pierreuse View Post
    Thanks, this is all interesting. I for one really like my quasis and I don't think it would be impossible to imagine dating one. I had a bad relationship with one of my quasis a long time ago but now one of my best friends is my quasi. My mom and brother are quasi-identicals though and they basically hate each other. I usually find my quasi's thoughts, views, and lifestyle to be interesting, refreshing and easy to understand even though they're not ones I would necessarily adopt.
    Yeah, that's the thing, they really like each other as people and there is a lot of love there. That is why they are still together. They just want totally different things out of it and there is a lot of miscommunication, which is why they both feel so unfulfilled.

    Personally, I think they are super awesome people. I adore them both.

  36. #76
    Pierreuse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    TIM
    EIE-Se
    Posts
    34
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by epheme View Post
    Yeah, that's the thing, they really like each other as people and there is a lot of love there. That is why they are still together. They just want totally different things out of it and there is a lot of miscommunication, which is why they both feel so unfulfilled.

    Personally, I think they are super awesome people. I adore them both.
    Thanks epheme. Yeah, I remember my quasi friend and I used to bicker a lot though it didn't seem like we were bickering at the time. We both genuinely seemed to like spending time together and had a lot of fun. However the life choices I've made that made sense to me seemed to really piss her off, and the stuff I was doing that seemed pointless to me always brought praise from her... The only thing that put a lot of strain on the friendship was her occasional outbursts which I didn't know how to deal with. The friendship is actually much easier though than some of my mirror and extinguishment friendships. I really cannot seem to keep IEIs or EIIs as friends without wanting to blow my brains out sometimes, but apart from the rare fight it almost never gets ugly or even disappointing with IEEs. I'm thinking maybe that's due to shared extroversion?

    I really don't get why everyone says not to date your quasi. I could easily see myself dating a male quasi. The things that annoy me about them are small details not worth actually taking seriously most of the time.
    Dandelion Fluff Upon a Spoon

  37. #77
    bolong's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    624
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa View Post
    Really, what do you say during sex that would make you type them better?
    This is a good point, but tbh you need to have sex with enough people to notice the difference between how an alpha NT will try to talk his way through and a beta ST kind of fumbles with words because his reaction to you is entirely physical

  38. #78

    Join Date
    May 2011
    TIM
    / / /
    Posts
    1,378
    Mentioned
    123 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just went on a date/hooked up with someone I'm 90% sure is an ESI, and it was the first time I'd interacted physically or romantically with that someone of that type.

    He delights in being unconventional or different from the mainstream, lives a polyamorous lifestyle (and has a primary girlfriend and they live together) and when I went to his apartment there were these huge drawings of tarot cards (major arcana) that his girlfriend had done, on the walls, and they were beautiful. So in a weird way, even while I was hooking up with him, the hopeless romantic in me was like thinking "I really admire the love you have with your girlfriend, who sounds awesome!"

    Thoughts:

    -We both seemed to enjoy each others' company and found interests in common. However, one thing I noticed while talking was that it was like not possible to follow directly and playfully off of what the other person said last, it was more like we took turns talking on the same topics. Also, I felt like my Ni was actually better than his... like he'd keep trying to say these profoundish things and I thought, "I can do better than that with the same idea!" Haha. I'm sure he had similar moments with me too, and my own deficiencies. We're both tactful and nice.

    -The sex was WEIRD! Not because of his collection of toys or his self-professed kinky nature, but because I'm so much more used to infantile than aggressor sex. Like he started kissing me at the bar, then on the street, then on the roof of his place, etc, etc... in this physically self-assured and slightly exhibitionist way. And the... "solidity" (for lack of a better word) of his physical motions really threw me off. It was almost like... I'm used to making these soft, slightly "luring out" motions, but he was so "heavy" and instinctive and I felt like I had no space to maneuver. Also, weirdly enough, I felt that we were both too physically instinctive, and as a result the sex wasn't mentally interesting, if that makes sense. It did indeed feel a bit like we both naturally knew what we were doing but had no one to really "make an impact" on with our strengths. That being said, it was still pleasurable... allowed me to lightly explore some of my more submissive fantasies. (note on this: I think it would have felt more smooth if one of us was an extrovert.)

    -I ended up leaving after the sex because we were both retreating slightly into our shells and I didn't feel sleepy or drunk or comfortable enough to fall asleep there. But I enjoyed meeting him a lot, and thought he was a lovely person.

    Can't see myself in a long-term relationship with a quasi... you really don't cover each others' weaknesses too well!
    Last edited by lemontrees; 07-03-2013 at 01:39 AM.

  39. #79
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My friend is IEE and dating an EIE right now. It's not been terribly long, so I can't give you long-term forecasts or experiences, but they started out strong and hung out with each other and professed they were "soulmates" within the first month. Hanging out all the time. She's appalled at how over-dramatic and over-emotional and moody he is. They've had a few arguments because of this. I mean, the IEE is saying what he's doing isn't logical and doesn't make sense lol. They ended up having an argument and taking some distance for a week, but then after a bit of time apart started hanging out all the time and sexual dysfunctions were fixed and so forth. I think she's already wedding planning. ._. She also likes to comment on just how alike they are and how much they think alike with very little differences, though he does manage to produce a different viewpoint. Which is guess kind of fits with quasis? Also, she complains that he tends to twist her words and read way too far into what she's saying. For instance, in one conversation, she said something like "we got together so fast I just don't want to regret anything" and he blew up the fact that she chose to use the word 'regret' and that meant 'she was already regretting it and was going to leave him because she wouldn't have said that word if she didn't mean what he thought that word meant' and etc etc.

    I'll let you know what else happens, but I'm biased against him because he's kind of a loser (as is her trend, along with never being single), but she's still in the throes of honeymoon period. And she's a chameleon girlfriend who changes what she likes and how she acts depending on who shes around, so all of a sudden shes really into gangster rap and basketball while proclaiming that shes ALWAYS LOVED SPORTS even though I've known her for almost 16 years. /not-annoyed-at-all

    Oh, she's also a 9, if that wasn't obvious.

  40. #80
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lemontrees View Post
    I just went on a date/hooked up with someone I'm 90% sure is an ESI, and it was the first time I'd interacted physically or romantically with that someone of that type.

    He delights in being unconventional or different from the mainstream, lives a polyamorous lifestyle (and has a primary girlfriend and they live together) and when I went to his apartment there were these huge drawings of tarot cards (major arcana) that his girlfriend had done, on the walls, and they were beautiful. So in a weird way, even while I was hooking up with him, the hopeless romantic in me was like thinking "I really admire the love you have with your girlfriend, who sounds awesome!"

    Thoughts:

    -We both seemed to enjoy each others' company and found interests in common. However, one thing I noticed while talking was that it was like not possible to follow directly and playfully off of what the other person said last, it was more like we took turns talking on the same topics. Also, I felt like my Ni was actually better than his... like he'd keep trying to say these profoundish things and I thought, "I can do better than that with the same idea!" Haha. I'm sure he had similar moments with me too, and my own deficiencies. We're both tactful and nice.

    -The sex was WEIRD! Not because of his collection of toys or his self-professed kinky nature, but because I'm so much more used to infantile than aggressor sex. Like he started kissing me at the bar, then on the street, then on the roof of his place, etc, etc... in this physically self-assured and slightly exhibitionist way. And the... "solidity" (for lack of a better word) of his physical motions really threw me off. It was almost like... I'm used to making these soft, slightly "luring out" motions, but he was so "heavy" and instinctive and I felt like I had no space to maneuver. Also, weirdly enough, I felt that we were both too physically instinctive, and as a result the sex wasn't mentally interesting, if that makes sense. It did indeed feel a bit like we both naturally knew what we were doing but had no one to really "make an impact" on with our strengths. That being said, it was still pleasurable... allowed me to lightly explore some of my more submissive fantasies. (note on this: I think it would have felt more smooth if one of us was an extrovert.)

    -I ended up leaving after the sex because we were both retreating slightly into our shells and I didn't feel sleepy or drunk or comfortable enough to fall asleep there. But I enjoyed meeting him a lot, and thought he was a lovely person.

    Can't see myself in a long-term relationship with a quasi... you really don't cover each others' weaknesses too well!
    Could you give some examples of the Infantile sexual style? I have a hard time seeing myself as others see me, and I have no idea how I am in that way. What they hell is infantile sex?
     
    God is most glorified when we are most satisfied in Him.
    - John Piper


    Socionics -
    the16types.info

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •