Massive Type-Me Thread

[Beautiful sky]

I think very not. I'm too impatient to play psychologist and I hate motivating people. And I'm terrible at giving compliments. I inspire people with beliefs of my capabilities and theirs when we're working to a common goal and it is beneficial to me to do so. It sounds selfish, but if I'm not getting anything out of it, I generally can't be bothered (I don't think anyone can, but that's another topic for debate).

You just said you were bad in Fe. Fe is the activation function of ILE; they are very good at it. The quote is directly from Jung's types.

[FoxOnStilts]

wikisocion on Activating function:

The subject is more comfortable using this function than the suggestive function but still can only use it sporadically. If he isn't careful and directs it at an individual who does not value it, he will likely meet a harsh response, since they are almost sure to see it as a puerile gesture (more so than when he uses the suggestive function, usage of which comes off as more mature and well-considered, since he takes it more seriously in the first place). The subject's innate lack of balance in the mobilizing function can easily cause him to indulge in it recklessly or to sorely neglect it. It is best used in support of the suggestive function.

If too much of this element is ambient, the person will get bored or even become repelled. He sees it as a necessary part of good living, but not a primary life goal.

[DirectorAbbie]

I just watched it. You spew -base like a pro. But you didn't get a good shot of the chocolates. I wish I could raise my eyebrows independently. I think you're ILE.

[Beautiful sky]

My quote says that Fi becomes shut off from providing sympathy or expression of, you just said you don't provide sympathy.

I'm reading from the BIBLE of socionics not an interpretation.

" I don't offer sympathy, I'm not sympathetic, and I certainly don't consider myself as embracing of misery. "

[FoxOnStilts]

Maritsa; I don't see Chapter X as the "BIBLE" of socionics, and if you do, you should probably go read some other of Jung's work. If Chapter X is considered the end-all-be-all of socionics to others besides yourself, then that's a strike against the system itself.

However, As delightful as this has been, I'm pretty much going to have to disregard most of what you say. It seems that you've been back-pedaling most of the time to see what you want to see, ascribing motives/reasonings/traits to me that don't exist at all, and, it's a waste of my time. Your definitions and sources are inconsistent with each other and anything else I've read, and these questions of yours grow more tiresome (mostly, I'm sure, because they were all answered in the OP.)


Abbie; I obviously need to go back and rewatch this video because people keep mentioning this chocolate and I have no idea what they're talking about. O_o

[Beautiful sky]

Maritsa; I don't see Chapter X as the "BIBLE" of socionics, and if you do, you should probably go read some other of Jung's work. If Chapter X is considered the end-all-be-all of socionics to others besides yourself, then that's a strike against the system itself.

However, As delightful as this has been, I'm pretty much going to have to disregard most of what you say. It seems that you've been back-pedaling most of the time to see what you want to see, ascribing motives/reasonings/traits to me that don't exist at all, and, it's a waste of my time. Your definitions and sources are inconsistent with each other and anything else I've read, and these questions of yours grow more tiresome (mostly, I'm sure, because they were all answered in the OP.)


Abbie; I obviously need to go back and rewatch this video because people keep mentioning this chocolate and I have no idea what they're talking about. O_o

You're disagreeing with the source that all Socionics, even wikisocion, which is just an interpretation of the original source; maybe you don't want to do socionics. Maybe you want to do your version of whatever.

[Beautiful sky]

You're going to continue guarding your thread from people who disagree with your type and you're going to garner support for your current typing (that's my Ni). I'm not changing your typing, because what I used, I typed you and that's it for me. I hope others who read what I wrote can decide between what I quoted and what you said and make up their own minds instead of being drones.

You don't want the facts, you just want people to agree with your assumption.

[Saberstorm]

Ok, I tried listening, but I could not hear all of it, even in a silent house with the volume on max. (You talk very quickly. So says the deaf US Marine...) I could go for ILE. You seem Alpha.

(Now will you marry me?) J/K!!

[Aquagraph]

Forgive maritsa, she has issues with most things not Delta. Even people who were typed right, become wrong if typed so by Maritsa as well.
You're a beautiful ILE creature. Just say something blunt, inconsiderate and hurtful to her (extra kudos if it's witty as well), show us your truly magnificent PoLR and prove your strong sways your .

[FoxOnStilts]

Forgive maritsa, she has issues with most things not Delta. Even people who were typed right, become wrong if typed so by Maritsa as well.

I tried a few times, but I think it just went over her head. She seems to be lacking in a sense of humor.

[Aquagraph]

I tried a few times, but I think it just went over her head. She seems to be lacking in a sense of humor.

Among other things, such as logic, non-imaginary boyfriend and charisma. But she doesn't have to care about my constant insults as she sees my weak and understands that it's just my insecurity speaking.

Oh, did I mention I'm real good at PoLR? And growing even more so?

Btw, I think you misquoted a bit.

[Saberstorm]

Can we have a pillow fight? Please?

[FoxOnStilts]

Btw, I think you misquoted a bit.

It's very likely. I just hit 10am on an all-nighter and am currently running off of caffiene, cigarettes, and chocolate. I'm waiting for the sleep-deprived existential crisis to kick in.

[Artsu Tharaz]

I'd say ENTP.

Ne dominance is clear enough. I watched the video under the perspective that you were ENFP, and it doesn't fit. You show emotion, but it's not that high up (face is comfortably blank, logic is guiding the process), and you are extroverting the emotion that is there.

Bonus type speculation for controversy's sake: this girl is INFp.

She is pretending to be Se dom, not Ne dom.

[Galen]

She is pretending to be Se dom, not Ne dom.

She's just acting like the scattered Pe-EXXp she is. Pretty much every video I've seen of her in a relatively candid setting is like a slightly toned-down and less purposefully awkward version of that.

[Blaze]

welcome foxonstilts, to the small club of female entps on this board! you do look like ILE in your pix....gorgeous.

[UDP]

This thread sort of reminds me as to why I faded out here.

Anyway, Fox strikes me as very ILE > IEE.