My name is Kingsley. What is my type.
Hello
My name is Kingsley. Some of you may know me already.
I have received a broad range of typings from others. I am interested in seeing the opinions of those here. I don't wish to volunteer to much unsolicited information, as I am wary of the impact of my own biases.
Please ask questions. Go...Thank you.
I need your previous account(s).Originally Posted by Kingsley
Not my type.
I need you to play the game
Was that really necessary?
My answer to your question is your answer to absurd request.
Mindfuck.
how do You expect anYone to tYpe You without saYing anYthing about Yourself...
and Yes mY Y keY is broken.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
yeah fair enough, you've got me bang to right guvnor. just know, that i never meant to hurt nobody, you see i only wanted the kids to know their old dads real type, you know, before i passed n all. And by doing this i though that maybe id better understand all that stuff.
but clearly i was wrong. ill send you and the good father a pm.
I beat the game, socionics or not, long time ago.
quitting the game is not beating it. it's just choosing not to play.
IEE-Ne
I said I beat the game, not quit the game, am not a quitter, I am a beater.
Difficulty: Brutal
It's clearly maritsa's husband.
I haVe told you eVerything.
Tell me your address Allie, so I can send you a working keyboard already.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
omg Socionics is Hellraiser
i am seriouslY considering this if You're seriouslY not a stalker... this is a question. i can't make question marks, either.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
Bingo.
i am seriouslY a stalker. do You need a PC or Mac keYboard...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Lol
Allie, I think post office boxes can be relatively inexpensive if you don't want people knowing your real address. Then again, for just this one instance it would probably be massive overkill. Or you could give a friend's address. Anyway, I'm guessing Parkster isn't a stalker. He just really would like to see your y's (and all the other characters) behaving for you again. Nails on chalkboard and that sort of thing.
"Kingsley"... um... questions... How would you describe antidisestablishmentarianism as it relates to you? What does "blue" make you think of? Which Disney character do you relate to the most and why?
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
@ minde - it's so bad it worth buying a new keyboard to stop seeing? I hadn't realized.
From my iPhone
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
Problem solved. You don't need a keyboard.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
*asks for allie's address and offers to send a working keyboard anyway*
*realizes that self is a stalker, gives up*
She is wiseWhy I love LSEs:
beyond words
beautiful within
her soul
brighter than
the sun
lovelier than
love
dreams larger
than life
and does not
understand the
meaning of no.
Because everything
through her, and in her, is
"Yes, it will be done."
A couple years ago I was put in charge of decorating the college for Valentine's Day. I made some gorgeous, fancy decorations from construction paper, glue, scissors, and imagination. Then I covered a couple cabinets with them. But my favorite was the diagram of a human heart I put up. So romantic!
I am going to ask Numbers to buy this one for me.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Nah.Gives your writing character, to me. And I can always tell it's you.
It's totally ok to do whatever you want about it, lol.
Oh, to find you in dreams - mixing prior, analog, and never-beens... facts slip and turn and change with little lucidity. except the strong, permeating reality of emotion.
I just have one request allie, when I send over the new keyboard, will you still continue to type in capital Y?
It's so endearing.
She is wiseWhy I love LSEs:
beyond words
beautiful within
her soul
brighter than
the sun
lovelier than
love
dreams larger
than life
and does not
understand the
meaning of no.
Because everything
through her, and in her, is
A couple years ago I was put in charge of decorating the college for Valentine's Day. I made some gorgeous, fancy decorations from construction paper, glue, scissors, and imagination. Then I covered a couple cabinets with them. But my favorite was the diagram of a human heart I put up. So romantic!
It's a long word. I have always thought that it was a word that people used to make themselves seem more educated than they really were. I never used it much but I knew it was a longest non scientific words in english, it's got a pleasing structure to it as well. I know that it
I never actually knew what the word related to until I looked it up about five minutes ago. It relates to a political belief that the church should be seperated from the government. In particular it originated in Great Britain with regards to the relationship between the CofE and the governemt. This interests me greatly, as although I am not religious, it seems that nations that have a liberal relationship between either a monarchy and/or a church, appear almost paradoxically to be freer and more progressive form those nations that don't e.g. I believe I read a report that african nations that adopted a constitutional monarchies after liberation from the colonising powers, were more stable and had higher levels of civil liberties than those that adopted a presidential system. Of course now that we live in modern decentred societies with a pluralistic perspective to faith or lack of faith, there is a strong arguement for finally abandoning these institutional dinosaurs. However as long as the influence is weak, and as long as the institutions progress and adapt, then I have no issues with there being a formal relationship between the CofE, Monarchy and Governemnt.
Right now the blue is making me think of the sea, fish, fishing boats, calm seas, a storm, back to calm, a city on the edge of the oceon, the sea and sky shimmering on the glass outers of the skyscrapers. people going to offices and homes, a man in an office, thinking, a new political system, antidisestablishmentarianism.
Disney character.... some of them and all of them, sorry I can't answer that
Your type is KOTh - King of the hill. Seriously, maybe Ni-Creative, LIE or EIE.
Kingsley, are you the auror from Harry Potter?
Thanks for you reply. What would you suggest to determine my exact type objectively, to rule out uncertainty, to exclude the maybe?
If you only knew how many times I've asked myself the very same question.
I suspected Ben Kingsley.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Kingsley how much of this is a game?
Can't really type you. I know nothing about you
Not sure whether (my) uncertainty can be ruled out, but usually I'm pretty sure after reading/knowing more of the person and the said type is reconfirmed over again - new attitudes fitting the same type values.
Kingsley left way too many clues on this forum.
All a game, a serious game though, with results observed and recorded.
OK, thank you. All I can say is that this initlal impression of yours, is of value to me. I doubt I'm LIE for example, however he last time I took a test (in part to gauge the tests results), it correlated my answers most strongly to to the LIE type. Of course I recognise that this does not mean I am any such thing, however, regardless of this it may (or may not) be a sign that whatever preferences i expressed in that test at that time (this was taken recently) are reflected in a current style of self expression, which shows in the way that my cognitive style is initially perceived by others.
Without clues, how would we discover that the vicar got drunk in the drawing room with the brandy?
Last edited by somavision; 11-05-2011 at 07:59 PM.
Try out this test and post your results: http://www.socionictest.net/Test.aspx
Is it my turn?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
yeah sure...Is it my turn?
Yes! It's your turn! I was waiting for this all day long! Type him! I bet you will type him as an SEE.Is it my turn?
Laws of Society,
how do you feel about them and their existence?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think you're last in line for gangbang, so yes.Is it my turn?
[QUOTE=;siuntal825183]Try out this test and post your results: http://www.socionictest.net/Test.aspx [QUOTE]
Firstly I asked my girlfriend to answer the test as if she were me.
ISFP(Dumas) - 270
INFP(Yesenin) - 245
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 230
ESTP(Zhukov) - 225
ISTP(Gabin) - 225
INTJ(Robespierre) - 220
INTP(Balzac) - 210
ESFJ(Hugo) - 190
ESFP(Napoleon) - 185
ENFP(Huxley) - 180
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 175
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 175
ENTJ(Jack London) - 175
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 150
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 140
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 125
I then answered myself, discussing answers with her where there was a moderate degree of uncertainty and skipping those with a high level of uncertainty
INFP(Yesenin) - 235
INTJ(Robespierre) - 230
ENTP(Don Quixote) - 230
ISFP(Dumas) - 210
INFJ(Dostoyevsky) - 195
INTP(Balzac) - 190
ENFP(Huxley) - 190
ENTJ(Jack London) - 185
ISTP(Gabin) - 175
ENFJ(Hamlet) - 145
ESFJ(Hugo) - 140
ESTP(Zhukov) - 135
ESFP(Napoleon) - 125
ISTJ(Maxim Gorky) - 115
ESTJ(Stirlitz) - 110
ISFJ(Dreiser) - 110
I've taken this test without before without in isolation. The top three were ENTJ, INTJ, ENFP with ISTJ at the bottom.
do you want the way i feel or think? And what do you mean by law? Are you asking for my feelings towards explicit law, as in the legal framework, or more generalised, the conventions that differentiate the behaviours that are expected of us within a place of worship, compared to a sports stadium for example? The everyday rituals that we perform to demonstrate that we understand and that we belong. In a nutshell, I understand and feel comfortable with them, I play the game, I understand that the implicit expectations of following social rituals and obeying explicit laws exist for reasons that benefit both myself directly and indirectly, however i also realise that the maintanance of established rules and customs can support ingrained inequalities. as a middle class white male, i do not have the motivation to fight forchange. I understand those that with to progress social ideas to advance the status of thems as individuals or as members of a social groups. but i suppose thats thinking, i feel ok you know? I think that a progreesive society will reflect a fair balance that supports individual freedoms as well as protecting the weak, in whatever sense that is. I see this balance wax and wane as a result of changing political priorites, although I feel ok. not good, not bad, comfortable, but that's just me. I am in a relative position of privilage, yet I can see that rules are bocoming fairer, a path toward a more equal and balanced society is being forged, within the borders of my nation at least. It may be stop star, but it is happening, seeds that were sown long ago, seeds of equality are starting to fruit,but this is not a time for complacency, social inequality still exists and will continue to exist. These tendancies to split people into groups and stereotype. but despite this rambling, you know, im not sure how i feel. i feel ok. what was the question.
Last edited by somavision; 11-06-2011 at 12:19 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
