View Poll Results: Frederick Leboyer

1. You may not vote on this poll
  • ILE

    0 0%
  • SEI

    0 0%
  • ESE

    0 0%
  • LII

    0 0%
  • EIE

    0 0%
  • LSI

    0 0%
  • SLE

    0 0%
  • IEI

    1 100.00%
  • SEE

    0 0%
  • ILI

    0 0%
  • LIE

    0 0%
  • ESI

    0 0%
  • LSE

    0 0%
  • EII

    0 0%
  • IEE

    0 0%
  • SLI

    0 0%
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Frederick Leboyer

  1. #1
    Big Sister IS watchIng me Sleep HERO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    420 funny town
    25 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Frederick Leboyer

    Frederick Leboyer: IEI (Fe-INFp) [Dominant subtype]; or Dominant or Creative IEI

    - from Birth Without Violence by Frederick Leboyer; pp. 21-39 (Part Two):


    To be born is to suffer. Birth is pain. For the woman, as we all know, and for the child as we have forgotten. Now that we are finally aware of it, let us try to understand why. What is it that makes being born such a horror?


    The nightmare of being born is not so much the pain as the fear. For the baby, the world is a terrifying place. It is the vastness, the enormity of the whole experience of being born which so terrifies this little traveler. Blindly, madly, we assume that the newborn baby feels nothing. In fact, he feels . . . everything. Everything, totally, completely, utterly, and with a sensitivity we can’t even begin to imagine.
    Birth is a tempest, a tidal wave of sensations and he doesn’t know what to make of them. Sensations are felt more acutely, more strongly by the child, because they are all new, and because his skin is so fresh, so tender, while our blunted deadened senses have become indifferent. The result of age, or maybe of habit.


    Let’s begin with sight.
    A new born baby cannot see. Or so we are told in books, and have come to believe. Otherwise, we could never shine a light straight into the eyes of a newborn baby as we do. What if we were to lower the lights as the child is being born? But why lower lights for someone who is blind?
    Blind? Maybe it is time that we opened our eyes. If we did, what might we see? Just as the head emerges, while the body is still prisoner, the child opens his eyes wide. Only to close them again instantly, screaming, a look of indescribable suffering on his tiny face.
    Are we trying to brand our children with the marks of suffering, of violence by blinding them as we do with dazzling lights? What goes on before a bullfight? How is a furious charging bull produced, mad with pain and rage?
    He is locked up in the pitch dark for a week then chased out into the blinding light of the arena. Of course he charges! He’s got to kill! Perhaps there lurks a murderer in the heart of every man as well. Is it surprising?


    Now hearing.
    Do you imagine a newborn child is deaf? No more than he’s blind. By the time he arrives in this world he’s been aware of sound for a long time. He already knows many sounds from the universe which is his mother’s body: intestines rumbling, joints cracking, and that spellbinding rhythm, the heartbeat; even nobler, grander, the throbbing undercurrent, the swell, sometimes the storm that is “her” breath.
    Then . . . “her” voice, unique in its quality, its mood, its accent, its inflections. Out of all of which is woven, as it were, this child. From a great distance come the sounds of the outside world. What a symphony! But remember that all these sounds are muffled, filtered, cushioned by the waters. So that once the child is out of the water, how the world roars? Voices, cries, any small sounds in the room are like a thousand thunderclaps to the unhappy child!
    It is only because we are unaware, or because we have forgotten how acute the sensitivity of a newborn baby is that we dare talk at the top of our voices or even, at times, shout out orders in a delivery room. Where we should be as spontaneously and respectfully silent as we are in a forest or a church.


    Now we begin to suspect what a calamity, what a disaster it can be to be born, to arrive suddenly into the midst of all this ignorance, all this unintentional cruelty. What about the newborn baby’s skin? This timorous skin that quivers at the slightest touch, this skin that knows if what approaches is friend or foe and can start to tremble, this skin, raw as an open wound, which until this moment has known nothing but the caress of the friendly waves lapping it.
    What is in store for it now? Roughness, insensitivity, the macabre deadness of surgical gloves, the coldness of aluminum surfaces, the towels, stiff with starch. So the newborn baby screams, and we laugh delightedly.


    Once the scales begin to fall from our eyes and we become aware of the torture we’ve made of birth, something in us cannot but shout “Stop! Just stop!”
    Hell is no abstraction. It exists. Not as a possibility in some other world at the end of our days, but here and now, right at the start. Who would be surprised to learn that such visions of horror haunt us for the rest of our days?
    Is that it then? Is that the extent of the torture? No.
    There is fire, which burns the skin, scalds the eyes, engulfs the whole being, as if this poor baby had to swallow this fire. Think back to your first cigarette, or your first whiskey, and remember the tears it brought to your eyes, how your choking breath protested. Such a memory might begin to help you understand how the baby feels drawing in his first gulp of air. Of course the baby screams, his whole being struggling to expel this vicious fire, to fight bitterly this precious air, which is the very substance of life!
    So it all begins with a “NO!” to life itself.


    If even that were the end of the suffering, the pain. But it isn’t.
    No sooner is the child born, than we grasp his feet and dangle him upside down in mid-air! To get a sense of the unbearable vertigo the child experiences, we must go back a bit, back to the womb.


    In the womb the child’s life unfolded like a play in two acts; two seasons, as different as summer from winter. In the beginning, the “golden age.” The embryo, a tiny plant, budding, growing and one day becoming a fetus. From vegetable to animal; movement appears, spreading from the little trunk outward, to the extremities. The little plant has learned to move its branches, the fetus is now enjoying his limbs. Heavenly freedom! Yes, this is the golden age! This little being is weightless; free of all shackles, all worries.
    Carried weightless by the waters, he plays, he frolics, he gambols, light as a bird, flashing as quickly, as brilliantly as a fish. In his limitless kingdom, in his boundless freedom, as if, passing through the immensity of time, he tries on all the robes, he tastes and enjoys all the forms which Life has dreamed up for Itself.
    Alas, why must it be that everything must become its own opposite? This is, unfortunately, the Law, to which all things must bow. So it is that, dancing in tune to this Universal Breath, Night leads towards Day, Spring to Winter. It is the inevitable law that turns the enchanted garden where the child once played so freely into a garden of shadows and sorrow.
    During the first half of pregnancy the egg (that is to say the membranes which surround and contain the fetus, and the waters in which he swims) has been growing more quickly than the child. But from now on the reverse becomes true: the fetus is now growing much bigger, becoming a little child. The egg does the opposite. It has achieved its own perfection and hardly grows anymore.
    Because he is growing so large, one day the child comes upon something solid – the walls of the uterus – and learns for the first time that his kingdom has boundaries. Because he keeps on growing, the space around him becomes more and more confined. His world seems to be closing in on him, gripping him in its clutches. The former absolute monarch must now reckon with the law! Careless freedom, golden hours! My foolish youth! Where have you gone? Why have you left me?
    The child, once his own master, now becomes a prisoner. Immured. And what a prison. Not only do the walls press in on him, squashing him from all sides, but the floor is coming up to meet him, even as the ceiling is descending slowly, relentlessly, forcing his neck to bend. What is there for him to do but bow his head in submission, accept this abasement. And wait.


    But one day he is rewarded for his humility. To his surprise the grip is now an embrace. The walls are suddenly alive, and the clutch has become a caress! What’s happening? His fear is changing into pleasure! Now he revels in the very sensations that first made him tremble. When they come he quivers with pleasure, curves his back, bends his head and waits, but this time, with anticipation, with wonder.
    What is happening? . . . What is the reason for all this? Contractions. The contractions of the final month of pregnancy, warming the uterus, preparing it for its new role.
    But then one day . . . the gentle waves lash into a storm . . . and there is anger in this embrace? It’s grinding, crushing, instead of holding, cherishing? The once pleasant game has become horrible. . . . It’s not being caressed, it’s being hunted.
    I thought you loved me, but now you’re squeezing me, killing me, pushing me down. You want me to die, to launch myself into . . . this emptiness, this bottomless pit! With all the strength he can muster, the child resists. Not to leave, not to go, not to jump . . . anything . . . but not this void. He’s fighting not to be cast out, not to be expelled, and of course he’s going to lose.
    His back stiffens, his head hunches down into his shoulders, his heart thumps as if it will break, the child is nothing but a mass of terror. The walls are closing in on him like a wine press crushing grapes. His prison has become a passageway, which is turning into a funnel.
    As for his terror, which is limitless, it has turned into rage. Animated by rage, he’s going to attack. These walls are trying to kill me, they must give way! And these walls are . . . my mother! My mother who carried me, who loved me! Has she gone mad? Or have I? This monster won’t let go. My head, oh my poor head, this poor head which bears the brunt of all this misery. It’s going to explode.
    The end is in sight. It must mean death. How can he know, this poor, unhappy child, that the darker the gloom, the obscurity, the closer he is to reaching the light, the very light of life!


    It is then that everything seems to become chaos! The walls have released me, the prison, the dungeon has vanished.
    Nothing! Has the entire universe exploded? No. I am born . . . and around me, the void. Freedom, unbearable freedom. Before, everything was crushing me, killing me, but at least I had shape, I had some form! Prison, I cursed you! Mother, oh my mother, where are you? Without you, where am I? If you are gone I no longer exist. Come back, come back to me, Hold me! Crush me! So that I may be!


    Fear always strikes from behind. The enemy always attacks you from the rear. The child is wild with anxiety for the simple reason that he is not being held anymore. His back, which has been curled up for months, which the contractions have drawn taut as a bow, is suddenly released, like a bow having let fly its arrow. But what a shock! To calm, reassure and pacify the terrified child, we must gather up his little body, hold it back from the void, save it from this unwanted liberty, which he cannot yet taste or enjoy, because it came all at once, and far too quickly. We must help him the same way we regulate the air pressure for a deep sea diver who has surfaced too fast.
    What fools we are! Instead of gathering up the little body, we hang it by its feet, leaving it swinging in the void. As for the head, this poor head, which has borne the brunt of the catastrophe, we let it dangle, and give the poor child the sense that everything is whirling, spinning, that the universe holds nothing but unbearable vertigo.


    Next, where do we put this martyr, this child who comes from the security, the warmth of the womb? We put him onto the freezing harshness of the scales! Steel, hard and cold, cold as ice, cold which burns like fire. A sadist couldn’t do better. The baby screams louder and louder. Yet everyone else is in rapture. “Listen! Listen to him cry!” they say, delighted at all the noise he’s making.
    Then he’s off again. Carried by his heels of course. Another trip, more vertigo. He’s put somewhere on a table and we abandon him, but not for long. Now for the drops. It wasn’t enough to stab his eyes with light directed right onto his face, now we’ve got something even worse in store for him. Since, we are the adults, we are the stronger, we decide . . .


    Of course we, prevail. We force the tender eyelids open, to apply a few drops of burning liquid. . . . Drops. Drops of fire, supposed to protect him from an infection long since eradicated. As if he knows what’s coming, he struggles like one possessed, he squeezes his eyelids tightly together trying desperately to protect himself.


    Then he’s left on his own. Adrift in this incomprehensible, insane, hostile world, which seems bent on destroying him. Escape! Escape! Suddenly an amazing thing happens: at the limits of his tears, the limit of his breath, at the limit of his misery, the newborn finds a way to escape. Not that his legs can take him anywhere, but he can flee to within himself. Arms and legs clasped, curled up into a ball, almost as though he were a fetus again. He has rejected his birth, and the world as well. He’s back in paradise, willing prisoner in a symbolic womb.


    But his precious moments of peace don’t last long. He must be elegant, reflect well on his mother! So for her sake he is squeezed into those implements of torture we call clothes.


    The glass has been drained to its dregs. The worn-out, defeated child gives up. He lets himself fall back into the arms of his only friend, his one refuge: sleep.


    This torture, this slaughter of an innocent, this murder, is what we have made of birth. But how naive, how innocent to imagine no trace will remain; that one could emerge unscathed, unmarked, from such an experience. The scars are everywhere: in our flesh, our bones, our backs, our nightmares, our madness, and all the insanity, the folly of this world – its tortures, its wars, its prisons. Of what else do all our myths and legends cry, all our holy scriptures, if not of this tragic odyssey.

    - pp. 112-128: Now we can see that fear and pain are one. These children are echoing what their mothers were, for so long, crying in labor. Of course they never said it directly. Who has the simplicity, the humility to say “I am afraid!”? Yet their poor bodies were nothing but a mass of spasms, locked muscles, unbearable tensions, frantic heavings, which bore silent witness to their panic, their terror. What could they have been saying but, “I am afraid, I am terrified!” By exorcising this fear, women have been freed from the agony of childbirth and their experience transformed. In the same way, by sparing the child this fear, this panic, we can transform birth into an enchantment.


    Those who are skeptical or simply refuse to change things might well say: “All right. Quite possibly it’s far from pleasant to be born. But what difference does it make? It’s all over in a few minutes. And afterwards who remembers? No one. So then what does it matter how the child is received, how he is welcomed?”

    No one remembers? Not only is that not true, but it is the complete opposite of the truth. The memory of birth and the terror that accompanies it remains in each one of us. But since it is so loaded with fear and pain, it lies dormant and totally repressed, like a dreadful secret at the bottom of our unconscious, like a ship on the ocean floor. But it is there, although we don’t always know it. Just like a name can be in our memory, but if it is linked with unpleasant overtones, we think we can’t remember it.
    Then again you might say if it is buried so deeply, why dig it up, why not just let it rest? Maybe we can’t. It is constantly trying to surface, and expresses itself in our nightmares, our myths, our most secret irrational inhibitions. One could almost say that the root of all anguish is an unconscious memory of birth and its terrors. Only those who have forgotten how it feels to wake up at night, overwhelmed with panic, and the feeling that lions and tigers were roaring under their bed, ready to pounce, would deny the devastating intensity of such fears, which are in fact nothing but shadows of the original fear: the fear which is birth.


    Fear. How few of us are aware of how much unconscious fear there is in our lives! All this fear linked with the horror which is birth.
    One can only imagine what it would be like to be born without this fear or with this fear immediately extinguished like a fire that’s caught before it gets a hold and becomes out of control. Yes, if this fear could be extinguished before it can take hold, how extraordinary life would be for one so blessed. The point of this book, of this whole story, is not just to make birth something nice. It is far, far more ambitious: it amounts to nothing less than a plan to give birth to heroes, those extraordinary beings who seem free of fear, and so can drink fully from the cup of life.


    A plaguing question was why it seemed no one was ever concerned about the child’s plight, and even ignored his anguish and despair. Maybe there is something there that we ourselves do not want to look at, possibly because it might awaken something unpleasant deep within ourselves that we’d rather not know about: our own fear of death.
    Strange, isn’t it, that there seems to be such a deep secret link between birth and death? It is as if the fear of death, the dark shadow that casts its gloom over our whole lives, is nothing but the unconscious memory of . . . the fear we felt when we were born. So that . . . but then it’s nearly too good to be true . . . one born free of this fear would travel through life as free as a bird.


    Is this why we cut the cord in such a senseless, untimely way? Well, you might say, it’s with the idea that it’s going to make the child breathe. Why are we so anxious that he should breathe? Of course there is the rational answer: lack of oxygen will damage the brain – which is quite true. But, as always, behind rationality is a deeper, hidden reason. Although no one is aware of it, those attending, watching a baby being born, unconsciously, unknowingly “hold their breath!” As if finding themselves back at this terrible point, this dramatic bridge between birth and death. . . . But because we do not have an umbilical cord beating for us, providing us with precious oxygen, the situation very quickly becomes unbearable . . . for us, that is to say.
    “Do something! Do something!” clamors the unhappy voice within . . . the voice of our own anxiety. While the easiest, most sensible thing for us to do would be to take a deep breath, instead, we cut the cord!
    The poor victim of this dramatic confusion, this unconscious projection, abruptly deprived of his umbilical cord and his previous supply of oxygen, suddenly finds himself choking to death. In utter despair, he utters the abominable scream everyone was so anxiously expecting, which brings a smile to the faces of . . . the fools we are. “Ah, he’s breathing!” everyone exclaims with great relief.
    “Ah, now I can breathe. I’m so relieved,” is what we might say if we were just a little more clear and aware of what was going on . . . inside. This process of projecting will now go on endlessly. And we proudly call it education.
    But is birth really so important, one might ask. It doesn’t last long, you could say, compared with what comes before and after it. Maybe it’s just a nasty moment to get through. But that is perhaps somewhat glib. After all, there is another “nasty moment” which, although equally brief, nonetheless casts a long shadow, and that is death.
    Yes, birth and the moments that follow, however few, will leave a mark for the rest of life. It is as if we are heading off in the wrong direction, starting on the wrong foot. It’s like a boat leaving the harbor, with the poor captain not knowing he has a faulty compass. This compass, one might say, is breathing.


    When we are born we enter the kingdom of breath. We embark on this endless oscillation which will carry us through life to deliver us dutifully into the hands of death. Breath is the fragile vessel on which we cross this ocean of life. Everyone breathes, of course. One could almost say that, in Nature, everything is breathing continuously. Rhythmically.

    But, for us, whether our breathing is free or impaired, makes all the difference. How many people go through life half-strangled, incapable of a real sigh? Much less, a real laughter?
    To live in freedom is to be able to breathe fully, freely. Which requires a straight back. That is to say, a spinal column which is free. Free and supple, lithe, flexible. And most people go through life with a broomstick for a spine. The mentally ill, for instance, are incapable of taking a full deep breath. If there is the least blockage along the spine, breathing – which is the essence of life – is impaired. The effects will be felt for a lifetime.
    In the same way that no two people have the same face, no two persons breathe in the same manner. Everyone breathes his own way. Usually very badly. In fact, people say, “I know I am not breathing well. Maybe I could learn.” Some people even try. But maybe breathing is not something that can be learned. The way we breathe was established, once and for all, the moment we were born. Far better to pay attention to it at that stage.


    More dangerously, others will say: “Doubtless birth does mark the child. But life is not a game. It’s a merciless battle. A jungle. So like it or not, you have to be aggressive.”
    It is an error to imagine that birth without violence produces children who are passive, weak, slow. Quite the contrary. Birth without violence produces children who are strong, because they are free, without conflict. Free and fully awake.
    Aggression is not strength. It is the opposite. Aggression and violence are the masks of weakness, impotence and fear. Strength is sure, sovereign and smiling.

    But it would be hard to convince the advocates of violence and aggression of this. Because they have suffered themselves, their reaction is to say: “Life has been hard on me. I’ve been knocked around and it’s made me what I am. Let it be the same for my children.” Which is as mean as saying: “I’ve suffered. Let them suffer as well!” An eye for an eye. The dreadful law of reprisal. The vicious circle of action and reaction. Leading only to endless misery and suffering. Surely the best way to ensure that the bitter taste will linger in our mouths forever.
    You’ll find it’s the same people who say: “So, women suffer in childbirth. It probably serves them right.”


    What is it that makes these people so bitter, so angry? They have not yet forgiven. Unconsciously, they’re still full of hatred for . . . their own mothers. It is this hatred which is at the root of all that led us to the stake, the Inquisition, the Crusades. All the abominable massacres committed in the name of king and country, or even God. This same hatred which is at the root of the feeling of guilt, the feeling of sin.

    Sin! There is no such thing as sin. So-called sin is nothing but our own blindness and ignorance. Our forgetfulness of the panic that is birth for the child. As for pain and suffering, it satisfies no God. If anyone doubts that in childbirth pain is unavoidable, this new approach to birth proves the contrary.


    What more can be said? Only one thing. Try. Everything that has been said is so simple that one feels embarrassed at having dwelt on it at such length. Perhaps we have lost our taste for simplicity. Once we’ve understood the point of this whole story, why don’t we try? Well, it takes . . . a lot of courage.

    We also need patience and humility. We must keep in mind that it is the child’s first experience of life. As any good teacher knows, there is one sacred right: the right of the child to experiment and make his own discoveries.
    Yes, patience, humility and silence, and the awareness that the newcomer is a person we meet and greet after he was nearly drowned in a storm. Oh, and of course . . . Love. Without love, the delivery room can be perfect, with the right lighting, the walls soundproofed, the bath temperature just right – and the child will still scream. If there is still any trace of nervousness, any suppressed anger within ourselves, the baby will pick it up immediately. His judgment is frighteningly acute. The baby knows everything. All in his own mysterious way. He catches everything, sees right into our hearts, knows the color of our thoughts, and all without language. This is what is meant when the saint is likened to the newborn. Each sends us back our own image. And so, whenever a baby cries we must ask ourselves the reason why.


    “There’s still something you haven’t told us. What becomes of these children born in silence? Are they any different from other children?”
    “It’s something very subtle. You’d have to see for yourself.”
    “All the same, can’t you try to tell me?”
    “We all go through life wearing masks. The mask of tragedy far more often than the mask of comedy. And it is this mask of tragedy that you see on the face of most newborn babies: their brows knitted and the corners of their little mouths turned down. A mask that hides their real face and makes most of them appear . . . ugly. Their poor mothers are downcast, since they expected a ‘lovely’ baby.
    Thank God, there is another mask. A wide mouth lifted in a smile, with relaxed eyebrows, and eyes crinkled with pleasure, not to say delight.”
    “But surely such a mask is never seen on a newborn baby?”
    “You think not? Then why don’t you look for yourself?”


    “Oh! This baby is really smiling. In fact he’s in rapture!”
    “It’s hard to believe, isn’t it?”
    “But this picture hasn’t got anything to do with what we’ve been discussing. The child you’re showing me must be at least three months old. Babies don’t smile before that age.”
    “That’s what people think. People and books. As for the baby you see before you, he’s not even twenty-four hours old.”
    “I . . . can’t believe it.”
    “I must admit it’s not the image of a newborn baby one is used to. And yet, there is still another mask.”
    “I’m not sure I follow you.”
    “You might say joy is not better than sorrow. It cannot last. Both are emotions which, after a while, cannot but turn into their opposite. Laughter and tears are very close you know. Far better not to wear any mask. Far better to be free of emotions, both good and bad.”
    “Free . . . of emotions? Whatever do you mean? I’m not sure I would like that. And anyway, what’s left for us if we don’t have our emotions?”
    “Well . . .”
    Beyond tears and laughter, peace and serenity, or as they say in India,

    Shanti! Shanti! Shanti!

    - from Birth Without Violence (Revised Edition of the Classic) by Frederick Leboyer, M.D. [New Translation by Yvonne Fitzgerald]; back cover: “Amazing . . . Birth without Violence is a sensual experience, visually and verbally, as its poetic prose blends with the pictures like the unfolding of a happy dream. . . . The impact is strong, [Leboyer’s] appeal inviting.”
    The Boston Globe

    Birth without Violence is the first book to express what mothers have always known: babies are born complete human beings with the ability to experience a full range of emotions. It revolutionized the way we perceive the process of birth, urging us to consider birth from the infant’s point of view. Why must a child emerge from the quiet darkness of the womb into a blaze of blinding light and loud voices? Why must an infant take its first breath in terror, hanging upside down as its vulnerable spine is jerked straight? Why must the infant be separated from its mother after spending nine months inside her nourishing body?
    Examining alternatives to technocentric approaches to childbirth, this new translation of the classic text, complete with a new author preface, shows us how we can ease the transition from womb to world without trauma or fear. Birth without Violence illustrates how to create an environment of tranquillity in which to welcome our children: a relaxed mother, gentle lighting, soothing atmosphere, and a warm bath that mirrors the child’s prenatal surroundings. Dr. Leboyer’s simple technique demonstrates how a birth without violence has far-reaching implications for improving the quality of human life physically, emotionally, and spiritually.

    FREDERICK LEBOYER, M.D., was graduated from the University of Paris School of Medicine, where he served as Chef de Clinique. He lives in Switzerland.

    - p. i: “Leboyer puts the baby into psychological focus. He conveys his message with superb photography and poetic language.”
    Psychology Today

    “Compelling because of its humane approach to birth.”
    Science News

    - pp. vii-ix (Preface to the Revised Edition): It is hard to remember the stormy, passionate reactions this book aroused when it was first published some twenty-five years ago.
    While it was greeted with enthusiasm by mothers all over the world, it gave rise to an outcry in all quarters of the medical establishment.
    And then, little by little, it all cooled down.

    Was the message heard and accepted?
    I am not sure.
    What was a strong wine became slowly watered down into the kind of herb tea that gives you a good sleep.
    And sad, not to say embarrassing, was that this book that had been written as a tragedy was to be found sandwiched among brown rice recipes and diapers under the misleading heading of “childcare.”
    The kind of misinterpretation that makes people say:
    Birth without Violence? It’s not a book I would read; I’m not expecting a baby.”
    “Latin? Why should I learn Latin? I’m not going to be a priest.”
    Or else
    “Hamlet? Why would I read Hamlet? I am American; I am not Danish.”
    Of course the blanket of childcare is more comforting, sounds nicer.

    For, after all, who wants to plumb the depths of one’s own mind and memory? Who wants to awaken the ghosts lying dormant at the bottom of the unconscious?
    Isn’t it easier to do aerobics than go through the pangs of psychoanalysis? And it takes the daring of a hero, an Odysseus, to go down into the inferno.

    But then, coming back to this book, if it is not just a nice new technique for childbirth, what is it all about?
    A story of life and death.
    Death! But I thought we were talking about birth.
    Who ever suspected that birth and death could be so close?
    That it is one and the same door we pass through whether we are entering or taking our leave.
    But then, all this is rather frightening.
    Frightening? Yes, it is terrifying.
    And one could say that the main character in this tragedy is FEAR.
    Fear and the child are born together.

    And when it dawns on us that this fear of death, which casts such a long shadow over our lives, is nothing but the unconscious memory of the indescribable panic and terror we experienced when we were born, we begin to see that there is more to it than meets the eye.

    And then we start dreaming.
    If this fear could be pacified, healed, the moment we are born, what an extraordinary life would wait for us.
    Too good to be true.

    Only when it is seen in this light does this book take on its true dimension.
    Perhaps it is madly ambitious.
    Human beings born with this fabulous boon: complete fearlessness.
    Blessed with a life free from anger and aggressivity.
    Able to tread the path of life with an unshakable smile and eyes glowing with burning love.

    . . . The description of a technique would have been much easier, and would have been an easier way to please a lot of people.
    But . . .
    There is no such thing as a technique for life.

    Frederick Leboyer

    - pp. 2-11 (Part One): “To be born is to suffer.” -- GAUTAMA


    “Do you think babies like being born?”
    “What do you mean, like to be born?”
    “Exactly what I said. Do you think children are happy to come into this world?”
    “Happy? But a newborn baby doesn’t feel anything. So it’s neither happy nor unhappy.”
    “How do you know that?”
    “Well, it’s obvious. Everyone knows that.”
    “That’s not much of a reason, is it?”
    “I suppose you’re right. But all the same, they don’t really see or hear properly, do they?”
    “And that makes you think they don’t feel anything either?”
    “Of course, they don’t.”
    “Then why do they cry so bitterly?”
    “Well, that’s to expand their lungs, isn’t it?”
    “Expand their lungs! That hardly explains it. My goodness, don’t tell me you’ve never heard a newborn baby cry!”
    “Yes, of course I have. But that doesn’t necessarily mean he’s suffering.”
    “Do you think he’s expressing his pleasure, his delight at being with us?”
    “I don’t think it’s either of those things. I told you, babies don’t feel anything.”
    “And what makes you so sure? If I may ask once more.”
    “Well, for a start, they’re so small. I mean, at that age . . .”
    “How can an intelligent person like you say that! As if size had anything to do with it. Small! As for age, have you forgotten that, the younger you are, the more intensely you feel? Young children suffer agonies about things that seem quite trivial to us because they feel a thousand times more than we do. This is the blessing and at the same time the curse of their heightened sensitivity.”
    “Well, you could be right. But, all the same, it’s still hard to understand that they can feel. I mean there is no real consciousness at that stage, is there?”
    “Consciousness? You mean they have no soul?”
    “No, no. I don’t mean a soul. I don’t know anything about the soul.”
    “But, consciousness? You know about consciousness? Wonderful! At last I have found someone who can explain this great mystery to me. My friend, I am on my knees. Tell me, please tell me. What is consciousness?”
    “Well . . . actually . . . well, you see, well . . . consciousness . . .”


    Let’s not continue this discussion.
    Arguing is refusing to see things as they are.
    Things, that is to say, facts.
    The simple fact is that as soon as a child is born he starts to cry, and how bitterly. And although this is very strange, it is the one thing that delights everyone there.
    “How beautifully my child cries!” exclaims the happy mother, thrilled and amazed that something so little can make so much noise.
    Does this crying simply mean that all the reflexes are normal and that the machine works? So man is nothing but a machine? Or could the cries be trying to express some pain, some terrible sorrow. If the baby is crying with such intensity doesn’t it mean that he’s suffering terribly? Could childbirth be as distressing for the child as for the mother? And if so, does anyone care? It doesn’t seem so, judging by the way we treat the new arrival.
    Alas, it seems a deeply rooted idea that “it” doesn’t see anything, “it” doesn’t hear anything. How, then, could “it” feel anything like sorrow or pain?
    The answer is simple: “it” cries, “it” screams, in short, “it” is an object.

    And what if, by any chance, “it” is already a person?


    The newborn baby . . . a person?
    Now, really.
    Medical books will tell you quite the opposite.
    Books . . .
    How often does the scientific truth of one day become the lie of the next. So how do we know what is what? Looking at the facts, that is to say, asking the person concerned, the child, might give us the answer.
    The trouble is that a newborn baby can’t speak. And yet when you think of all the noise they make, it’s hard to say they cannot express themselves. If a Chinese man breaks his leg, although you may not speak a word of Chinese, you can understand his screaming perfectly. And when it comes to screaming, who in the world can scream like a newborn baby?

    And if you won’t take my word for it, see for yourself.


    What else is there to say?
    The tragic forehead, the screaming mouth, these closed eyes, clenched eyebrows, these desperate, pleading, outstretched hands, these feet, furiously kicking, the legs curled up to protect the tender stomach, this flesh which is nothing but a mass of spasms, jolts . . .
    How could you say that a baby doesn’t speak when with his whole being he’s protesting:
    “Don’t touch me! Don’t touch me! Leave me alone!”
    And at the same time begging:
    “Help me! Somebody please help me!”

    Has there ever been such despair in one voice?
    This child is in agony. But nobody even hears it. Isn’t that extraordinary?


    “Do you mean to say that . . . the reason this baby is crying so bitterly . . . do you think he’s trying to tell us . . .”
    “Your mind will use any trick in order to block out what it really means to be born.
    Looking at the pictures we’ve seen, people might say: ‘But that’s not a normal birth. This baby is being tortured by sadists!’
    Sadists? No. Just ordinary people like you and me. And if you don’t believe me, just look. Just see.”

    - pp. 15-17: Oh no! This can’t be true! This mask of indescribable agony, these hands clutching, clinging onto this head, like someone struck by lightning, shattered, who at any moment is going to fall to the ground, like a mortally wounded soldier.
    This . . . a birth?
    It’s a murder.
    And in the midst of all this suffering, the parents . . . in rapture!
    But it can’t be true! No! It can’t be true! And yet, it is true. Yes, this is birth for the child.


    Isn’t it amazing how blind we can be?
    Let us try to understand why. Actually it is simple. Take the young doctor; what is he smiling about? The happy child? Not exactly. “His” delivery has been a success. Mother and baby are doing well, so this man is pleased. Pleased with himself, that is to say. And the mother? Blissfully happy as she smiles at her baby. Maybe she’s smiling because it’s over. She’s done it! She’s very relieved, and more than anything, she’s proud. Proud of herself most probably.
    The father? The man, who has more than likely never done very much out of the ordinary, has managed to produce (or so he is thinking!) a son and heir! A small heir who’s going to carry on the accomplishments of his parents! Of course he’s proud!
    In fact, you could say everyone is delighted. All delighted with themselves, except . . . the child.


    Isn’t it a tragedy?
    We should be crying tears of shame, crying for our own blindness. The same blindness that made us think women had to suffer simply because we didn’t know any better. Happily we no longer believe in the old saying: “In pain shall ye give birth.” Isn’t it time to do for the child what we’ve been trying to do for the mother?


    But what can be done for this poor child? Are we to look to the amazing advances in modern technology for the answer?
    No. Quite the contrary. It was only when we asked what causes a woman to suffer when she gives birth that we began to see it was her FEAR that made her fight and tighten up, lock herself into the vicious circle: the more pain, the more fear, the more fear, the more pain. With the same simple approach let’s try and understand what makes the child suffer.

    - pp. 42-67 (Part Three): “The answer is in the question.”


    We were wondering about how best to prepare the child . . . Now we can see it’s not the child who needs to be prepared. It is ourselves. It is our eyes that need to open, our blindness that has to stop. If we used just a little intelligence, how simple things could be.


    In short, everything begins in paradox. The child was in prison, and as soon as he’s free, he yells!
    This, they say, often happens to prisoners. We open the cell doors, and the freedom makes the prisoners disoriented, goes to their heads! In fact, they begin to behave as if they missed their cells, their jail, and would prefer to be locked up again! And unconsciously they do everything they can to find themselves once more safely behind bars!
    In the same way, seeing the newborn baby panic-stricken by his freedom, you feel like saying: “Why are you crying? You are absolutely miserable when you should be rejoicing! Try and understand what’s happened, so you can enjoy your new freedom! See how you can stretch yourself, play and move around! What are you crying about?”
    At that point everything seems to be in a state of complete confusion, almost impossible to repair. And yet it is all very simple. As we shall see.
    To communicate we must speak to the child in a language he can understand, one which doesn’t rely on words and yet may be understood by anyone.
    Love. Speak . . . the language of love . . . to a newborn!
    Why, yes, of course! How else do lovers communicate? They don’t say anything, they simply touch. Because they are modest and shy, they shun the light, prefer darkness, night. In obscurity, in silence, they reach for each other, wrapping their arms around each other, they re-create the old prison, in which they feel safe, protected from the world outside. Their hands speak, and it is their bodies that understand.
    So this is the way to talk to the newborn: in silence and darkness, with gentle and loving hands, that reassure and move slowly, and in time with his breathing. But let us go step by step, sense by sense as it were.


    Let us begin with sight. Like lovers, let’s turn down the lights.
    Who could make love under a spotlight?
    Therefore let’s keep only the least light – a candle for instance – for the sake of the doctor’s vision.
    How peaceful, how calming this half light is, and so much in keeping with the mother’s own inner silence.


    Now hearing. Nothing could be simpler; all we have to do is remain silent.
    Simple? Perhaps it’s not as easy as it sounds at first. The mind is so noisy. It is not always easy to stay silent in the company of others. One has a tendency to think of something and feel impelled to say it. Yet it is only if we pay attention to the other, and to our own depths, that we will experience that something beyond words. But silence is not something that comes spontaneously to us, rather we must search for this and call it up from deep within us. In fact, the first women who experienced silence in childbirth found it so new that they were disturbed, even frightened.
    As the end of labor is approaching, there should be very few words spoken in the room. In the quiet you can feel that you are coming very close to something of gravity. The silence will be like the hush that settles over the room of someone who is dying. Perhaps it is the same threshold we cross, whether coming or going.
    Such an almost tangible silence has a most powerful effect on the child, although how or why cannot be explained. Yet it dispels the panic, holds back the fear that was waiting to surge up within the child. Of course, at times it is necessary to say something, to give an instruction. This must be whispered, almost inaudible. When we first attempted this, our hushed voices took women so completely by surprise that they were overtaken by panic. In this intense silence all the mothers could hear . . . was that they couldn’t hear anything! The children responded spontaneously to this tranquility. But the mothers’ eyes, as they darted from one face to another, begging for an answer, told of the women’s surprise. Unable to hold back, they burst out: “Why isn’t my baby crying?” It was agonizing. It was astounding. It was heartbreaking. “Why isn’t my baby crying?” It was like the cry of an inconsolable child whose toy was not what he had been hoping for.
    We had not thought it necessary to tell the mothers beforehand that their babies probably would not cry. And because this silence seemed so pleasing to us, it had never occurred to us that it might frighten the mothers.
    But “My child isn’t alive!” would wail the despairing voice. It was ludicrous.
    “Your child is fine!” we would whisper. The whispering made things worse.
    “What are you whispering about? Is my baby dead? Oh, no! My baby is dead!”
    Dead! Even as the child was wriggling and moving on her belly. “Stop!” we would say. “Dead people don’t move! Can’t you feel your child moving; can’t you sense how happy he is?” But our words went unheard.
    All this made us realize that we should have explained to the mother what was going to happen. A silent happy newborn is so new and unexpected, it goes completely against accepted ideas. So we tried, although a bit late, to explain the silence: that it was maintained out of respect for the child, out of concern for his ears, that we were quiet because we didn’t want to frighten him with our loud voices. We tried to explain to the mothers that it is no more necessary for her child to be born suffering and screaming than it is that she go through hell in order to give birth. Our explanations came too late. Their eyes remained full of doubt, of regret!


    This education, this initiation into silence is just as necessary for all those who attend the woman when she’s giving birth: the obstetrician, the midwife, the nurses. People tend to speak loudly in delivery rooms, often shouting their words of encouragement: “Come on, push! Push!” Which is a complete mistake. Intended as encouragement, these loud exhortations are instead most disturbing for the mother. For a woman in labor is in what might be called an altered state of consciousness, and hypersensitive to the slightest noise or movement around her.


    Darkness, or almost, and . . . silence. A profound peace settles in the room. You can feel the respect which naturally attends the arrival of a baby. One doesn’t shout in a church. One spontaneously lowers one’s voice. If there is such a thing as a sanctified place, surely it is the room the child is about to enter.
    Subdued light, silence . . . what else is needed? Patience. Or rather, the sense that one should slow down and thereby enter into another rhythm; the profound rhythm of life, to which the mother has spontaneously become attuned, and which is also the tempo of the child.
    Unless you have re-created this incredible languor in your own body, it is impossible to understand birth. Impossible to meet the newborn on his terms. In order to reach this deep understanding, to arrive at a place where you can meet the child, you have to, as it were, step out of time. Step out of our time. Meaning our strong, familiar sense of how time is flowing, of the apparent speed with which, for us, it seems to flow. Our sense of time and the time sense of the newborn baby are practically irreconcilable. The one is a state of near stasis, the other state, ours, is often a frenzied restlessness, close to madness. Besides, we adults are never “here.” We are always somewhere else. In the past, in our memories. In the future, in our plans. We’re always looking back, at what is gone, or ahead, at what is yet to happen. Never focusing on “here and now!” Yet if we have any hope of rediscovering the newborn baby, we must step outside of our own furiously running time. Which seems impossible. How can we step out of time? How can we escape its fast and furious flow? The only way is by trying to be fully with the present moment. Yes to be here and now, as if there were no yesterday, no tomorrow. To allow any thought that the moment will end, that another appointment awaits, is enough to break the spell.
    As usual, everything is very simple. And apparently impossible. How can we reconcile the irreconcilable? How can finite combine with infinite? It can only happen if we open completely to the other, which means completely forgetting oneself.


    Now the stage is set. The lights are dimmed. The curtain may rise. The child can make his entrance. At last he is here.


    Head first, and then his shoulders, one after the other.
    Either all this happens naturally, or some help is needed at this critical moment.
    As soon as the head is out the child wants to draw breath, which is impossible for him because his chest is still imprisoned in his mother’s body. If the shoulders are stuck, his progress comes to a halt, and help is needed quickly, because anguish is building up furiously in the child.
    How can we help?
    By sliding a finger under the child’s armpit we can help the rotation of his body and liberate the little prisoner. Then, holding him under both arms we hoist him out, as if pulling him from a well, and put him straight onto his mother’s belly. Most important of all, we never, never, at any time touch his head.
    He’s lying on his mother’s belly. And where better to receive the child than this belly. It has the exact shape to receive the baby. When he was within, it was rounded and convex; it has now become hollow, and waits like a nest to cradle the child.
    Soft and supple, it moves with the rhythm of the mother’s breathing, and the living warmth of her body makes it the perfect place for the newborn to be. Finally, and this is most important, because the baby remains so near to her, the umbilical cord can remain intact.


    Cutting the cord the moment a baby has emerged from his mother’s womb is an act of extreme cruelty, and harms the baby to an extent that is hard to believe. Leaving it intact, however, so long as it continues to beat, transforms the whole birth experience. For one thing, it forces the obstetrician to be patient, and leads him, as well as the mother, to respect the rhythm, the sense of time ordained by the child. Besides, leaving the cord intact allows the natural physiological changes to take place within the child’s body at their own pace.
    We have already described the way air suddenly rushing into the baby’s lungs has the same effect on him as a burn. But there is more. Before his birth, the child lived in oneness. For him there was no difference between the world and himself, because inside and outside were one. He knew nothing of polarities. He didn’t know about being cold, for example, because cold cannot exist without heat. The body temperature of the mother and the baby are exactly the same. How then could he appreciate any contrast?
    So you might say that before birth, there was neither inside nor outside, any more than there was hot or cold. As he enters this world, the newborn baby encounters for the first time a kingdom of opposites in which everything is either good or bad, pleasant or unpleasant, agreeable or disagreeable, wet or dry.
    What is the gate through which he enters this kingdom of opposites? Not through his senses, that comes much later, but through breathing. When he takes his first breath, he crosses a threshold, a border. He breathes in, and from this action is born its opposite: he breathes out. And then in turn . . .
    Thus he is launched irrevocably into the eternal cycle, the never-ending oscillation, the very principle of our world, in which everything comes back to this breath, this pulsation. He is in the world where everything, for always, is born of its own opposite: day from night, summer from winter, riches from poverty, strength from weakness, never ending, without beginning.


    To breathe is to become one with the world outside, to tune into the music of the spheres. Its function is to make the blood take in oxygen and get rid of wastes, mostly carbon dioxide. But in this simple exchange, two worlds come near each other, try to mix and touch: the world of outside and the world of inside. Two worlds, separated, try to reunite: the interior world of the organism, the little “I,” and the exterior world, the vast universe. It is in the lungs where they meet – the blood mounting from one’s own depths, the air coming from above. The blood and air rush to conjoin, anxious to mix and mingle. Of course they can’t, separated as they are by the barrier of the alveol membrane. Both sigh for this lost oneness.
    The blood arrives in the lungs, depleted of its oxygen, its strength spent, dark with waste: the carbon dioxide which makes it old. Here it is going to rid itself of its old age, gain its energy, rejuvenate. Transformed by this visit to the fountain of youth, it departs, alive, red and rich! It returns to the depths where it gives forth its riches. Once more lets itself be filled with wastes, and then returns to the lungs. Thus the cycle continues indefinitely.
    As for the heart, it keeps pumping, pushing the blood, sending it, rich and red towards the thirsty tissues of the organism, and sending it back when it has become old and worn-out, for renewal to the lungs.
    How does all this happen in the fetus, where the lungs are not yet working? The blood of the fetus, just like ours, needs to be renewed. The placenta fulfills this role. Among other things it does, it takes the place of the lungs. The blood comes and goes through the umbilical cord, which contains three conduits, a vein and two arteries, covered by a sheath. So, the blood of the fetus renews itself, not by contact with air in its lungs, but in the placenta by contact with the blood of the mother, which in her lungs . . . and so on. The mother, in effect, breathes for the baby, just as she eats for him, carries him, protects him, sleeps and dreams . . .
    Yes. The child is completely dependent before his birth. But then what happens? A total upheaval: The blood, that until then flowed through the cord, suddenly rushes into the lungs! The child abandons the old route, he leaves the way of the mother. In the act of drawing breath, of oxygenating his own blood with his own lungs, the child becomes himself, in effect saying, “Woman, what do we have in common? I no longer need an intermediary between myself and the world?”
    Of course it is only a first step, for all the rest he still relies totally on his mother. But it’s a step in the right direction. With his first breath, the child sets forth on the road to independence, to autonomy, to freedom. But practically speaking, much depends on the way this transition takes place. Whether this transition is made slowly, progressively, or brutally, in panic and terror, can make the difference between a gentle birth . . . or a tragedy.


    If the changeover comes abruptly it will leave a mark for the rest of life. Any future change will always be perceived as threatening. Of course, the child must not, at all costs, be deprived of oxygen, not even for one moment. Here there is no quarrel with medical science which agrees perfectly with nature’s plan. Nature provides oxygen for the child through two sources: the cord continues to beat, even as the lungs begin to function. The two systems work together, one taking over from the other, like a relay. The first, the cord, continues to oxygenate the child until the new system, the lungs, has taken over completely.
    Although the child is out of the womb, he remains dependent on his mother through the umbilical cord, which continues to beat strongly for several minutes, four or five, sometimes even longer. Oxygenated through the cord, and thus protected from anoxia, the child can, without shock or danger, settle down to breathing without being rushed, in his own time.


    What should we do during these critical few minutes of the transition of the blood from the old route through the placenta to the newly working lungs? We must understand that Nature herself doesn’t take sudden leaps and has her own pace. She has left this time, these few minutes, so that this changeover from one world to another can be made with ease. She has made it so that the baby is oxygenated from two sources for several minutes as, at the same time, an orifice in the heart closes, and the baby is then safely on his own.
    For a few minutes the baby straddles two worlds, as it were. Then slowly, slowly he can cross the threshold from one to the other peacefully and easily, and with all safety, as long as we don’t rush in, interfere, and can manage to quell our old reflexes, our nervousness, born, in fact, out of the anxiety of our own birth. The effect on the well-being of the child will be immeasurable. We are all so quick to blame Nature, when actually she’s so full of love and wisdom, and it is only we who are too blind to see.
    Whether the cord is cut abruptly or allowed to stop beating of its own accord completely changes, even determines the way in which a child perceives his entry into the world, and, consequently, the way he will react to the continuous change which is life. You might say that his perception of this moment will color the rest of his life.
    If we cut the cord immediately, we create a situation which is the opposite of the one Nature intended. By clamping the cord before the lungs are fully operative we deprive the child’s brain of oxygen. The organism cannot but react violently to our aggression, and then a whole system of stress comes into play. Not only will we have done something absurd and uncalled for, but we will have set up what Pavlov called a conditioned reflex which will recur throughout life.
    What have we linked together? Life and breath, breath and the fear of impending death. What geniuses we are!


    You might then ask, how is it that, even when the transition has been allowed to take place in its own time, the child may still give a cry or two? The answer is simple. The thoracic cage, now that nothing is compressing it, suddenly expands, thus creating a void. The air rushes in and it burns. Naturally the child tries furiously to expel the air. This is the first cry. Then, often, everything stops. The child pauses, as if dumbfounded by his own suffering. It can happen that he might repeat the cry two or three times before this pause. Then when this pause comes, it is we who panic. And usually . . . a slap on the bottom follows. But now that we know better and can control our impulses, our fears, and trusting the strong beat of the cord, we can keep our hands to ourselves.
    Soon we will see . . . breathing beginning again of its own accord. Hesitant at first, timid, careful, it will still pause from time to time, marking little breaks. The child, oxygenated as he is by the cord, is pacing himself and taking in only as much of the burning element as he can put up with, then pausing, only to start again. As he gets used to it, he begins to breathe more deeply.


    Soon he learns to enjoy what, in the beginning, was so very painful. Very soon, his breathing, which was at first so hesitant and doubtful, becomes joyous. In all, the child has given only one or two cries. All we hear now is a deeply peaceful breathing, punctuated by short cries, exclamations of surprise, or even sighs of pleasure. Mixed with this breath are the sounds the baby is making with his lips, his nose, his throat. A language all its own. And never, never, those screams of terror, those wails of despair, those hysterical shrieks. Maybe a child has to give one or two cries when he’s being born, but must they be cries of anguish?
    Because the child is pleased with this new experience, tasting it in all its newness, he can easily forget the world he has left behind. No regrets, not a backward glance. Coming into life is like waking from a long and pleasurable sleep, and not from a nightmare. When the present is so delightful, why cling to the past?
    Now that the cord has stopped beating, we can cut it. Not a sound, no crying, no cause for alarm, not even a tremor; it has simply become obsolete, and so can be removed. An old bond has been left behind. We have not wrenched the child from his mother, they have simply parted, and will go their separate ways. Why would the young traveler yearn for the past when his voyage ends so happily and he has found the other bank, so tranquilly, so surely?
    How intelligent, what a blessing such a birth is. Because we left the cord beating it is as if his mother had accompanied him across the border, and led him gently into this formidable and forbidding world. Just as later, when he learns to walk, she will be there offering him her hand to hold.

    - pp. 68-108: Have you ever watched a bird take flight? As he’s still walking, he’s heavy, awkward, his wings drag, and then suddenly he’s flying, graceful, elegant and free. He was the son of earth, now he’s the child of the skies. Can you say when he left one kingdom for the other? It is so subtle, the eye can hardly catch it. As subtle as stepping in, or out, of time, to be born, or to die.
    What of the tide, which imperceptibly, irresistibly rises, only to fall. At what moment did it turn? Is your ear sharp enough to hear the ocean breathe?
    Yes, this birth, this wave parted from wave, born from the sea without ever leaving her. Don’t ever touch it with your rough hands. You understand nothing of its mysteries. But the child, the drop from this ocean, knows.
    A wave pushes him towards the shore, another pulls him back, only to push him higher still. One more, and he’s out of the flood. He’s parted from water, and come to the land. He’s frightened, terrified.
    Let him be. Just wait. The child is awakening for the very first time.
    This is his first dawn. Allow him its grandeur, its majesty. Don’t even stir until he leaves behind the night and its kingdom of dreams.


    The rest, you might say, is detail. Once breathing is well established, everything is accomplished. All has either succeeded or failed. But details, as always, are not without importance. For example, in what way should we put the baby on his mother’s belly? Should we lay him on his side, on his stomach, or flat on his back?
    Never flat on his back. That would cause the spinal column, which has been curved for so long, to straighten all at once. It would suddenly let loose all the dormant energy locked in there and the shock would be too much. It would be like an explosion. Let the child unfold his back when he feels ready himself.
    Don’t forget that each child comes equipped with his own character, his own temperament, his own pace. There are some who are no sooner born than they lift their heads proudly, draw themselves up, and stretch out their arms as if to say: “I’m here!” These are the strong ones, who settle into their new kingdom as if they were kings. Their spines straighten with the force of a tightly strung bow releasing its arrow. But sometimes, the very same children will then withdraw, pull back, frightened by their own audacity, their own bravery.
    There are others, who start off curled up in a little ball, and only open up little by little, making their discoveries cautiously. Because we cannot anticipate what’s to come, the best thing to do is to put the child flat on his belly, with his arms and legs tucked under him. This is a familiar posture, the one that best allows the abdomen to breathe freely and the baby to work his way, at his own speed, towards the final unbending.
    Then, because the child is on his front, we can keep an eye on his back, and see how he is breathing. In fact, the bending of the spine, of the back, and the beginning of breathing are all one. We can watch how breathing takes over the whole of the baby’s body. Not only the chest but also the belly, and especially the sides. Very soon, the baby is nothing but breath, which passes like a wave from the top of his head to the small of his back. This wave is like the shadow of the contractions which, like waves themselves, pushed the baby to the shore. At the same time it is like watching a tree start to grow. Out comes an arm, usually the right, stretching like the branch of a tree. Then the other. Both seem surprised that nothing stops them anymore, that space can be so limitless, so vast. It’s like watching branches grow out of the power of the breath. The breath is to the child as the sap is to the tree.
    Now the legs. One after the other, like roots which will one day stabilize this tree. But not yet. For the time being they are still very tentative, for they have had to fight their way out of the enchanted cave. In order to allay their panic, all that is needed is to offer them some limit: an open hand the baby’s feet can meet, offering gentle resistance but able to be pushed away. Otherwise, the baby will feel completely disoriented.
    So, little by little, everything settles down, or rather, everything comes together harmoniously. Soon, just as if he is waking from his first sleep, the baby stretches out with a complete sense of his own well-being. Since, while all this has been happening, the cord has stopped beating, we are now ready for the next step. But let us go slowly, pausing often.


    Haven’t we come a long, long way? We are out of the water, we have touched dry land. We’ve left behind the ever-moving, changing, treacherous kingdom of the fishes. Now it is the earth that carries us. Earth which is steady, tranquil, sound and true. Earth we can trust.
    For the very first time, nothing moves. What a surprise. But since there is a price for everything, we now know for the first time how it feels to be heavy. We’ll have to crawl. And yet the skies are there, above our heads. It is their light, their divine light that gave us the courage to emerge. And they will give us the courage to stand and walk.
    What a long, long road, this path from mineral to man. The path each must tread again when he’s come to taste the joy that is life. What else are we doing when we pray? Nothing but returning to the source, the source of all life, as if going through the whole adventure again. Wanting to pay homage to Earth, our mother, we kneel. With folded arms and a humble heart we bow to the ground. Our forehead touching the dust we say I obey for I know that, in your wisdom and love you know better. There we remain, folded up, empty, as empty of that precious breath as the child not yet born who hasn’t yet tasted that pleasure of life. Having paid our respects, expressed our gratitude to the one who carries us, to whom we owe everything, into whose womb we will return at the end of our days, we arise.
    Like a bow that has let go its arrow, how vibrant we feel when, unfolding, we let the air and its joy fill us full – as vibrant as we were the day we tasted our very first dawn. This, in truth, is prayer. Since to pray is to be born anew to the fullness of life. But then, can one pray in a hurry? Can it be rushed? As with the child who’s just arrived, who’s joined us, can’t we grant him a moment of time?


    A few words about the hands which will hold the newborn baby. These hands are the first thing that the child will encounter. The language they speak is the primal language, the language of touch. This is how mother and child were communicating. It was through the child’s back that he received her messages.
    Now that he’s born, naked and disoriented, the way we touch him is crucial. Most of the time, the hands of the doctors, the midwives, and the nurses are not gentle enough. Simply because they have not realized what it means to the child. Because these hands are so unaware, and move much too quickly, they terrify the child. Let them be gentle but firm. Most of all, let them move very, very slowly. Everything we do for the newborn baby is too rushed, too hurried for one who is only just entering time.
    At this moment, what the child needs is to be massaged, just as newborn animals need to be licked by their mothers – the act without which they often die. It is most important that the hands that will massage the baby’s back can rediscover the rhythm he knows, the rhythm of the contractions, the rhythm that moves with the outward breath. What the child wants to feel again is not the wild fury, the storm of labor, but the embracing waves that told him of his mother’s love.
    Our hands should travel along his back, one following the other, like wave after wave breaking onto the seashore. The rhythm of dancers, of lovers. Love . . . and the child! Yet what is it lovers are looking for, if not to heal the rift, return to the primal sea, rediscover its infinite pulse. A return to paradise, a pilgrimage back to the source.


    So much for rhythm, for movement. But there is something else that can be transmitted through hands, even hands that are not moving. The child is still so sensitive that he will know by the feel of the hands resting on him whether he is loved or refused, accepted or simply being carelessly handled. Under caring hands, the child opens up and lets go. Whereas, under stiff mechanical hands, he feels he’s being clutched by claws, and of course he closes up, withdraws in panic, as if to escape to within himself for protection.


    Naturally, it’s the mother’s hands that should hold the child. But often she’s still overcome by her own emotions, her own fears, which she’s hardly had time to leave behind. Her hands are not yet steady and sure. If someone else, such as a loving midwife, is there, calm, and able to transmit her inner peace, her hands would be better in the beginning, until the mother has had time to catch her breath. It’s not that we want to take the child away from his mother, but the intensity of what she’s just lived through can still be affecting her so strongly that it overwhelms the child. In these crucial moments, the child needs peace, quiet and calm.
    Often mothers don’t know how to touch their babies. Or maybe they just don’t dare. Some deep inhibition seems to hold them back, stop them.
    Why? Possibly because the child has just come from a part of the body we don’t want to, don’t dare to mention. Perhaps it’s our education that makes us step back, as if this part of us does not exist, or at the very least, is not something we talk about. So the mother finds herself in a troubling, conflict-filled situation, torn between her natural urge and her inhibitions, product of her repressive education.


    Now let’s come back to the child. The fullness of his breath tells us that all is well. The cord has been cut. It is as if centuries have passed and yet it has only actually been a matter of a few minutes.
    What comes next? However blissful this time has been for the mother and baby, it must come to an end. The child cannot stay on his mother’s belly all his life. Just as the child had to depart from the womb, now he will have to leave his mother’s body.
    To meet what? This first step in life cannot be but terrifying. How can we ease it and pacify this terror? In the same way that giving a new toy to a child makes it easier for him to part with the one he’s been playing with, so we must find a way to make him enjoy his first moment of separation and thus gladly accept that he’s on his own. Of course we’re not going to put him on ice-cold weighing scales, and even the softest towel cannot compare with his mother’s body. What could be the answer?
    Water. This is where he has come from, and what he’s known all his life. It’s gentle, it’s familiar. It is this very familiarity that in the end will completely calm him. It will be like meeting an old friend when one is far from home. This feeling of something familiar saves the child who is lost in an overwhelming world of new sensations.
    A bath has been prepared in a small tub, filled with water at body temperature, or slightly higher since it’s going to cool down quickly. With the permission of the mother, who must be willing, we take the child, and slowly, slowly we ease him into the water, feet first of course. A sensitive eye can catch how intense the experience is for the child. As soon as he finds himself back in water, he becomes weightless again. Water has, as it were, once again taken the load off his body. His joy and feeling of relief are hard to describe. We have nearly accomplished a miracle, we have turned this first separation, which is always loaded with anguish, and which shadows us all our life, into a joy. One can feel any remaining tensions in the baby melt away, vanish under our hands.
    And as these tensions melt away, and what is left of his fear disappears, and the child feels so safe, he even dares to open his eyes. No words can describe the depths of this first look. It is as if he is asking all the questions of man in that single moment. Then it becomes so clear that life does not start now, at this point, but that the child was aware long before he came to us, and has merely crossed a threshold.
    In disagreement with all classical psychology, anyone who has witnessed such a birth cannot but exclaim: “But this child is looking! . . .”
    Whether he “sees” in the way we do is another issue. Maybe we have to accept that there are many ways of seeing, of knowing.


    Completely free from fear, and his first surprise over, he begins to explore his kingdom. His head turns to the left, to the right, as if enjoying its new freedom. Out comes one hand from under the water, it opens and reaches towards the sky. Then the other.
    His hands move in such harmony you’d think you were watching a ballet. They meet, clasp, and part, moving with all the grace of an underwater plant. As for the legs, a little hesitant at first, soon they too begin to stretch and play. And here it is important to say that the feet of the baby should always be able to find the edge of the bath, to find a limit, as it were. Otherwise, if they meet with nothing, the child will experience the same panic as a swimmer out of his depth.

    Because his first experience has been so rich and so pleasant, this baby will always be an adventurer. Life, for him, will always be a challenge, which he will meet with confidence and courage, and an eagerness to try and taste everything new that might cross his path. Is not the constant newness of life, its continual change and variety, the thing we find most difficult?


    Now that fear has subsided, and been left behind once and for all, let us try to be free of the past and its fascination. Let’s try to take the step out of the sea, to land, and meet with the earth.
    Fourth step. Fourth station of this calvary which is birth, where there is neither sin nor punishment. It is truly an odyssey, and the hero, the newborn, has accomplished something so difficult.
    So little by little we begin to take the child out of the water. If he doesn’t like this idea, and protests, because once again he’s feeling all his own weight, we don’t force him, but lower him back in again, only to try to take him out a moment later. Once again he protests, goes back to the water, and comes out again, and what at first seemed unpleasant now becomes a game. This game we play with him, lifting him out and lowering him back in the water, is a way of playing with weight and weightlessness. Isn’t it true that no matter the culture, children all over the world love to swing, which makes them, in turn, heavy as a stone, and light as a bird?
    Eventually we lift him out completely, dry him gently, and swaddle him in something warm, letting him experience for the first time this feeling that nothing is moving. Another new and extraordinary feeling for him. Remember that all those months he spent inside his mother, everything was moving, whether his mother was walking or simply breathing quietly in her sleep.


    But now, for the first time . . . and how strange . . . nothing is moving at all! This is the majesty of Earth.
    For all those children who have been rushed into the world, who haven’t been led gently from water to land, from movement to stillness, with so much love, intelligence and patience, waking up on their own will always frighten them. This immobility will always terrify them. But for the child whose birth has been such a blessing, these fears will not exist. He’ll be free forever from nightmares and guilt.


    How impressive it is to watch this child open his eyes wide, begin to feel his way around, explore all that surrounds him. All with no panic, no tears. On the contrary, with a seriousness, a gravity that’s hard to believe. Yes, this child is truly like a wise man, an old soul, because whatever he does, it is with complete awareness.

    But also it seems as if something is emanating from this child. He seems to radiate a peace, a serenity, that he’s brought from somewhere far beyond. The words of Lao-tzu come to mind: “One who possesses virtue in abundance, the Holy one, is like a newborn babe.”

    But what is this “virtue”? It has nothing to do with morality, being virtuous. “Virtus” in Latin means courage, vitality, virility. What Japan and China call Chi, and India, Shakti. It is the secret, silent power of a Zen Master, a true Master of Martial Arts, or a saint. For one who is sensitive enough to feel it, sense it, it is this “virtue,” this grace, this Chi, this Shakti that silently flows, shines like a blessing from the newborn.

    - pp. 110-111 (Part Four): "In the pursuit of learning one knows more every day. In the pursuit of the way one does less every day. Less and less until one does nothing at all. And when one does nothing there is nothing that's left undone."



    Now our story draws to a close. Now that the child has tasted the joy of being on his own and the wonder which is stillness, let him return to his mother. Not in a panic, not because he's looking for someone, anyone to save him, as one might cling to any branch when drowning, or seek any port in a storm. No, it is with eyes wide open, in all awareness and with inner peace that these two will meet.
    Lying once again on his mother's body, his ear against her heart, the child rediscovers the familiar steady beat. All is accomplished. All is perfect. These two who have battled so fiercely are at peace, at one again. Maybe we can leave them alone together. In fact, we should. To remain would be an indiscretion.
    Last edited by HERO; 11-01-2012 at 07:38 AM.

    Kristen Pfaff and Kurt Donald Cobain didn't like the scene anyhow

  2. #2
    Big Sister IS watchIng me Sleep HERO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    420 funny town
    25 Post(s)
    0 Thread(s)


    - from Loving Hands: The Traditional Art of Baby Massage by Frederick Leboyer; pp. 9-10:

    When we are born, we cry that we are come
    To this great stage of fools.

    --Shakespeare, King Lear

    If we ask, not “What is life?” but, more simply, “When and where does life begin?” an answer comes naturally:
    “Life begins at birth.”
    Which seems so obvious that it sounds like a platitude. But . . . Within the womb, is the fetus dead?
    Of course not.
    Indeed, we know today that it enjoys all kinds of sensations. Even dreams!
    And so no one, after serious reflection, can really say that “life begins at birth.”
    What is it, then, that does begin at the moment we are born? What is it if not life?
    Fear! Fear and the child are born together. Fear is our faithful companion, our twin brother, our shadow. It will never let go its hold. Until, remorselessly, it sees us into our grave.

    - pp. 12-13: Life was so rich within the womb!
    Rich in noises and sounds. Both from the mother’s body and from the outside world.
    But mostly there was movement. Continuous movement. When the mother sits, stands, walks turns—movement, movement, movement . . .

    All pleasant, comforting sensations for the small creature inside.
    And when the mother is quiet, either sitting or lying down, even when she goes to sleep, her steady, sure breathing keeps on, rocking the littler traveler inside her, gently, continuously.
    All day and all night, the endless flow of sensations and movements.
    But now . . . !

    Here is the child in the cradle.
    All alone. Not a sound. Not a whisper.
    And worst of all . . . there is no movement!
    Everything is dead. A horrible dead feeling everywhere.
    A horrible loneliness.
    The world outside is dead, while, suddenly, from within . . .
    What is it!
    What is this “thing” inside my belly that starts to creep, to gnaw at me, to bite?
    No! It is not inside! It is out there . . .
    I can hear it! I can feel it in the dark, lurking, panting, ready to pounce on me.

    - pp. 14-19: Hunger a monster?
    But isn’t feeling hungry quite pleasant? Don’t we rather enjoy it, several times a day?
    Yes, it is pleasant . . . for us. Since we know that food of some kind or other will be coming.
    But for the baby?
    When this “terrible thing within” suddenly begins tearing at him, what can he do? Can he go to the kitchen? Or to a restaurant? Can he just call “Waiter! Waiter!”
    He does call actually: “Mommy! Mommy!” In the only language he knows: He cries, he screams. And most of the time, no one even cares to answer.

    Inside, the terrible “gnawing thing,” and the remedy, the satisfaction . . . somewhere . . . outside.
    Inside and outside. Space is born. And suffering.
    Inside, outside: two. That come together. Yes. But often so clumsily.
    Two . . .
    Oneness is lost. Forever.
    Inside and outside. And, in between, waiting. Waiting, which is pain. Waiting, which is agony. Waiting, which is Time.

    And so it is that Time and Space are born with appetite.
    Yes, if a baby starts crying the moment it wakes up, it is not because it is starving. It is because of the newness, the strangeness of its condition.
    And the contrast: this new, terrible gnawing thing inside, and the stillness, the deadness, outside.
    A baby’s belly is hungry. No doubt. But its skin is just as hungry. Its skin is craving, and so is its back, and so is its spine, craving for touch, craving for sensations. Just as its belly craves for milk.
    One should never forget how the baby’s back had so much fun in the womb. I have written already about how it felt before birth. I have told how the little one, at first, was frightened by the contractions. But then got used to them. Until it loved them and longed for them. And I have told of the unbearable feeling of void the child experiences being born: Suddenly there is nothing more to hold its body and support its back.

    The terrible, awe-inspiring scream of birth is nothing but the expression of this sudden, unbearable, maddening nothingness—which is simply no touching, nothing along my back!

    Therefore, if we keep in mind that waking and being born are very similar
    (parting with one world
    coming into another)
    can we be surprised that babies start crying the very moment they wake up?
    The whole contrast of birth is there again. And its terror: nothing talks to their backs
    nothing outside
    and making it worse!
    the terrible gnawing thing inside.
    Nothing outside
    everything inside!
    Complete reverse. The world is mad!

    This is why we must caress, we must rock babies.
    And, even better, massage their bodies that are so empty, so hungry “outside.” Feeding babies with touches, giving food to their skins and their backs, is just as important as filling their stomachs. It makes outside happy. Inside and outside satisfied. . . . No more two. Oneness again. And peace.
    Yes, we should not forget that the five senses are one. And all of them extensions of the skin. They are, in a way, the fingers of the brain, feeling, exploring the world outside. They open one by one, reaching further and further. Expanding the universe. Enriching it.
    The sense of smell reaches far beyond where the hand can go. Hearing goes further still. And seeing . . . To see is to caress the whole world with the eyes. But everything starts with touching. Language, which “knows” far more than we realize, holds memories of this.
    Don’t we say:
    “I tried to get in touch.”
    “Oh, how touching!”

    - from THE UNTOUCHED KEY by Alice Miller; p. 157: Millions of women have given birth in hospitals . . . under cruel and inhumane conditions, and no one seemed to notice that here a human creature of the tenderest age is being subjected to torture. All that was needed to change this pattern was for one obstetrician, Frederick Leboyer, to take the difficult path of discovering, with the aid of feelings, the memory of his own birth concealed in his psyche and his body. All that was needed was for him to relive his own repressed pain, and suddenly he was able to perceive for the first time what was self-evident: the cries of an infant in the delivery room are expressing pain that is altogether avoidable. To make this simple observation, he first had to overcome the resistance that each of us builds up as a child. We are entitled to this resistance, for we must protect ourselves as best we can from what is unbearable; but what happens when it makes us blind to the most obvious phenomena in our life?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts