Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 62

Thread: The reason that Ni is related to time

  1. #1
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default The reason that Ni is related to time.

    Most retarded socionics theorists typically trying to explain Ni as something relating to time. And while Ni does relate to time, this is a gross oversimplification of what Ni does.

    In model B the context becomes much more clearer. Both intuitive functions are what I'd call the functions of relativity as they relate to how one views him/herself in relation to the environment, and how one views the environment in relation to the self. Basically the way one tags the meaning of the environment to the self will directly impact the potentiality that one gives the objects in the environment. Both functions basically revolve around how one views the flow of everything.

    (-Ni) and (+Ne) functioning typically relates to the type of people are are rather philosophical and introspective. They typically see time and space as this infinite spectrum (+Ne) with unlimited potential. Time, so to speak, runs through their mind. The beta feelers are typically more spontaneous and dreamy. They typically have a romanticeqse personality, as their secondary functioning revolves around localization and roots from common sense derivatives. Alpha thinkers on the other hand, typically have a more long winded approach. Everything is globalized, as they actually attempt to see the root of the infinite spectrum.

    (+Ni) and (-Ne) functioning is typically on the opposite end of the spectrum. +Ni is extrospective and adaptive. Typical philosophy is more ingrained in the wave of humanity, thinks of self as loyal to the hive. They tend to see things in a more restrictive, bound to whats in front of their face sense, adapting with the moment. Gamma thinkers typically have a down to earth common sense mind. They make good accountants, statistical mathematicians, stock brokers, etc. In business hierarchies they are usually the man behind the man, as they are extremely loyal. Delta feelers have a very motherly down to earth personality. They attempt to treat everyone as equal, while ironically hold on to their conforming persona. Disagree but accept is the slogan of Delta feelers. They may even go at great lengths to help others conform to their goals through positive reinforcement.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  2. #2
    Memory of Tomorrow Reuben's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Oh baby, baby, baby
    TIM
    No idea
    Posts
    1,928
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I actually like the Beta NF better than the rest of the intuitives.

    Very clear writing hitta, good job.

    An example of beta NF: I sit alone waiting. The leaf falls, and whispers its silent descent - you did not come.

    An example of alpha NT: It is imperative that we find the theory that unites all theories of the universe!

    An example of gamma NT: My advice is this - do not invest in china now, the value-to-wealth differential is slowly growing wider as we speak.

    An example of delta NF: Why do you behave this way? I detest it... but we must always tolerate different people in the society.
    She is wise
    beyond words
    beautiful within
    her soul
    brighter than
    the sun
    lovelier than
    love
    dreams larger
    than life
    and does not
    understand the
    meaning of no.
    Because everything
    through her, and in her, is
    "Yes, it will be done."


    Why I love LSEs:
    Quote Originally Posted by Abbie
    A couple years ago I was put in charge of decorating the college for Valentine's Day. I made some gorgeous, fancy decorations from construction paper, glue, scissors, and imagination. Then I covered a couple cabinets with them. But my favorite was the diagram of a human heart I put up. So romantic!

  3. #3
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    Both intuitive functions are what I'd call the functions of relativity as they relate to how one views him/herself in relation to the environment, and how one views the environment in relation to the self. Basically the way one tags the meaning of the environment to the self will directly impact the potentiality that one gives the objects in the environment. Both functions basically revolve around how one views the flow of everything.
    This is what I thought too. Not that this has anything to do with your post, but its abstract is also a contradiction to the relations though; it suggests intuitive egos can form a successful relationship with any type through how they view and associate with them. And that's probably true - f the hypothetical relations.

  4. #4
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    Both functions basically revolve around how one views the flow of everything.
    Ne does not deal with a flow, unless you figuratively call how things mesh together in a whole like that, a continuous topology, which is however not conencted to time, changes, etc (not by itself).
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  5. #5
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    Ne does not deal with a flow, unless you figuratively call how things mesh together in a whole like that, a continuous topology, which is however not conencted to time, changes, etc (not by itself).
    How one views the potential of objects is always directly related to how one one views the flow of their reality.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  6. #6
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    How one views the potential of objects is always directly related to how one one views the flow of their reality.
    But they are different things, Se and Ne for instance (force, momentum, potential) are merely vectors, they determine only a rectilineal potential path, which does not coincide with a continuous flow, but some instances along it.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  7. #7
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    But they are different things, Se and Ne for instance (force, momentum, potential) are merely vectors, they determine only a rectilineal potential path, which does not coincide with a continuous flow, but some instances along it.
    Conceptually, yes, but in the scope of the ego's philosophy, its action has to come from an influence/understanding of the ID. It's a philosophical duality. Explaining one without the other function counterpart is more incomplete, more conceptual.

    Do you disagree on this philosophical arrangement then?

  8. #8
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    if objects don't have intrinsic value how do they flow?
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  9. #9
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by he died with a felafel View Post
    the idea of the 'flow' sounds more like Si imo. do you think it would be more 'correct', as it were, to refer to Si that way rather than Ne? PS: also, 'flow' does not sound like a characteristic of a static element. maybe you meant sth else tho, dunno.
    Ni and Ne are philosophical tags. Ni and Ne both relate to the potentials of things, its how the mind philosophically categorizing the world. The essence, so to speak, of what one sees. Ne relates to one views the potential of objects in the world. Ni on the other hand, is a little bit more different to put into words. It breaks down into how the world views the potential of the self(yes I know this sounds cheesy). It is kind of the essence of how one feels, the center of the self; how one sees themselves moving through from moment to moment..... the perspective. +Ni types have a merged perspective, more localized, ingrained within the parameters of the web of the collective conscious. This causes a contained vision of objects because their viewpoint is ingrained within the confines of the collective conscious. -Ne is basically dependent potential. -Ni is the outsider/observer perspective. -Ni dominates feel unique, different. Because of this their perspective is rather uncontained and unbound, they tend to have a more open energy, as they think of everything as being possible and constantly changing. They have a more globalized view of the collective conscious because they themselves feel distinct from it.

    To answer your question, its a different kind of flow. Also note that Si and Se are mirrors of Ne and Ni, as they have dimensionality vectors between them(when one of them is conscious/valued, the other set is unconscious/valued). The flow you mentioned is actually connected. I'll make a graph explaining that later.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  10. #10
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    if objects don't have intrinsic value how do they flow?
    Ha! You touched a sensitive point. I wrote a small article about it, actually starting off your other thread. I copy an excerpt from it, now that you and felafel brought it up...

    "The unconscious information (of opposite Dynamicality) is a necessity, an immediate consequence of the conscious one. The awareness of intrinsic properties implies the extrinsic, and the other way around, although the conscious can use only one at a time. To use the classical mass VS weight example, mass is a (Static) subjective property assigned to the body, but it implies and is deduced from weight, whithout which mass would be just a meaningless label. On the other hand, weight (Dynamic) has no conclusion without mass, the assumption that the body itself has something inherent to it that makes it behave like that."

    The point is that we can perceive a property only dynamically, based on the evolution and interactions of the objects (rea or imaginary), though we continue to identify the object having that property statically (inside it), a subjective approach [1]. These two views are however opposite sides of the same coin, one can't be conscious along with the other in the same instance (and the same object/property, of course). Although the action is directly affected by potential or power, its awareness makes the static perception its slave (and the other way around [2]). The better team makes the victory, but the victory makes the better team - it's just a matter of orientation of the conscious.
    ---

    [1] - this is besides the point, merely a reminder of this implication: Static, Fields and Internal are all subjective aspects.
    [2] - in the latter I in way agree with you, the intrinsic value determines the outcome, though I can't see how the flow can be determined from it, in fact it is necessary to ignore/dismiss the development as irrelevant.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  11. #11
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    Do you disagree on this philosophical arrangement then?
    No, I agree with it. My idea was that flow (but also interactions, extrinsic and synthetic properties, consequences, time, etc) falls wholly into one of the two partitions - namely Dynamic, therefore excluding Ne.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  12. #12
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,635
    Mentioned
    157 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Seems rather overcomplicated.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  13. #13
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    internal dynamics of fields.

    QED

  14. #14
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  15. #15
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Model is for intuitive dominants.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  16. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    2,934
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Reuben View Post
    I actually like the Beta NF better than the rest of the intuitives.

    Very clear writing hitta, good job.

    An example of beta NF: I sit alone waiting. The leaf falls, and whispers its silent descent - you did not come.

    An example of alpha NT: It is imperative that we find the theory that unites all theories of the universe!

    An example of gamma NT: My advice is this - do not invest in china now, the value-to-wealth differential is slowly growing wider as we speak.

    An example of delta NF: Why do you behave this way? I detest it... but we must always tolerate different people in the society.
    Its ok reuben we like you even though we hate you

  17. #17
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I agree completely and you're a genius hitta.

    If you showered more and were in better shape, and were gay- I would totally suck your cock right now. Damn. You are one smart dude.

    (sorry im being too much like Reuben)

  18. #18
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    internal dynamics of fields.

    QED
    It's more like this:

    example
    Code:
    INTJ      EGO: Ti Ne
    INTJ SUPEREGO: Se Fi
    INTJ  SUPERID: Sx Fx
    INTJ       ID: Tx Nx

  19. #19
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no it's not.

  20. #20
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,832
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Problem. As Ni and Ne dominants both have relatively strong use of the opposing attitudes element, does an Ne dominant also have a reasonably competent ability to visualise such time aspects and also is an Ni dominant reasonably competent at bouncing off ideas? Is the only difference which comes first? Is the time difference moot? I wonder anyone can gauge theory without strong test points for proof.



    I don't think that Ni is time related as is often described. It is however representative of a highly exclusive and insular thinking and interpretation structure regarding ideas and theories.

  21. #21
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    no it's not.
    Okay, so you internalize dynamics. Then how do you do things like feed yourself, move your body, and make money?

  22. #22
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    Okay, so you internalize dynamics. Then how do you do things like feed yourself, move your body, and make money?

    All dynamic elements have an internal quality. The mechanism is kind of hard to put in exact words, but I'll give it a go anyways. Dynamic elements are the way that static elements relate back to other elements. In terms of personality, this means back to the self. They are kind of like the actual narrative of the person's view on the static elements, which roughly translates to how things flow through our perceptions. They are our perceptive filters so to speak.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  23. #23
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    Okay, so you internalize dynamics. Then how do you do things like feed yourself, move your body, and make money?

  24. #24
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    All dynamic elements have an internal quality. The mechanism is kind of hard to put in exact words, but I'll give it a go anyways. Dynamic elements are the way that static elements relate back to other elements. In terms of personality, this means back to the self. They are kind of like the actual narrative of the person's view on the static elements, which roughly translates to how things flow through our perceptions. They are our perceptive filters so to speak.
    Postulate: Reality is causality (undetermined).
    Postulate: Causality must have causes (or causation).
    Conclusion: Events are due to causes; dynamics are statics and statics are dynamics.

    Postulate: Reality is not causality (determined).
    Postulate: Reality remains the same.
    Conclusion: Reality is constant.

    Then how do we study behavior? What is constant and what is causal?

    Quote Originally Posted by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophy_of_History
    Speculative philosophy of history asks at least three basic questions:

    What is the proper unit for the study of the human past — the individual subject? The polis ("city") or sovereign territory? The civilization or culture? Or the whole of the human species?

    Are there any broad patterns that we can discern through the study of the human past? Are there, for example, patterns of progress? Or cycles? Is history deterministic? Or are there no patterns or cycles, and is human history random? Related to this is the study of individual agency and its impact in history, functioning within, or opposed to, larger trends and patterns.
    And what is more important in analyzing behavior, how things are now and going to be (constant) or how they were (non-deterministic)?


    Focusing on one aspect of pre-defining dynamics as storytelling through describing static elements, is just a focus. Why should I accept your (constant) focus as truth over mine?
    Last edited by DividedsGhost; 10-29-2011 at 03:04 AM.

  25. #25
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    If you can't answer simple questions, others won't listen to you. Good thing that's my goal.

  26. #26
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    If you can't answer simple questions, others won't listen to you. Good thing that's my goal.

  27. #27
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    Postulate: Reality is causality (undetermined).
    Postulate: Causality must have causes (or causation).
    Conclusion: Events are due to causes; dynamics are statics and statics are dynamics.

    Postulate: Reality is not causality (determined).
    Postulate: Reality remains the same.
    Conclusion: Reality is constant.

    Then how do we study behavior? What is constant and what is causal?



    And what is more important in analyzing behavior, how things are now and going to be (constant) or how they were (non-deterministic)?


    Focusing on one aspect of pre-defining dynamics as storytelling through describing static elements, is just a focus. Why should I accept your (constant) focus as truth over mine?
    I don't understand what point you are trying to make.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  28. #28
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If we're saying alpha and beta are more similar by way of intuition, then that would mean they both have the same intuition in theory, with different focuses. But I don't think that they do, in theory alpha/beta are similar by way of Fe/Ti focus, but use different intuitions, which is already a given (I think?) Since all people think, feel, intuit, and sense.

  29. #29
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol. INFp Ti...

  30. #30
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    Nah, I expected this from you actually. You seem to prefer trying to make things personal in an effort to make your opponent look under-confident rather than making a good argument. You rarely engage people constructively when they attempt to refute your claims.

    If you'd actually make an effort, you would see I'm not contradicting you, but including it in a broader system.

  31. #31
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hitta View Post
    I don't understand what point you are trying to make.
    Point is, the ego feeds into the unconscious and the unconscious can overpower the ego.

    Quote Originally Posted by poli View Post
    If we're saying alpha and beta are more similar by way of intuition
    How did you reach that conclusion?

  32. #32
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    lol. INFp Ti...
    lol @ ENFp Ti

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    How did you reach that conclusion?
    OP said that.

  33. #33
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    Nah, I expected this from you actually. You seem to prefer trying to make things personal in an effort to make your opponent look under-confident rather than making a good argument. You rarely engage people constructively when they attempt to refute your claims.

    If you'd actually make an effort, you would see I'm not contradicting you, but including it in a broader system.
    try harder to sound coherent.

  34. #34
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    try harder to sound coherent.
    I love you too.

  35. #35
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by poli View Post
    If we're saying alpha and beta are more similar by way of intuition, then that would mean they both have the same intuition in theory, with different focuses. But I don't think that they do, in theory alpha/beta are similar by way of Fe/Ti focus, but use different intuitions, which is already a given (I think?) Since all people think, feel, intuit, and sense.
    How exactly do you think that Alpha intuition differs from Beta intuition?





    That's Bukalov's model by the way.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  36. #36
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,832
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I'm sorry sir.

    I'm too busy pretending we can use a very generalized cognitive model to predict specific behavior!


  37. #37
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Tcaud's statement that Ni is the effect (or at least his theory seems to make sense in the scope of what happens) of Te and Fe is somewhat correct because if you think about it, Te and Fe are dynamics of fields as in they perceive events in sequences, externally, these two functions kind of feed Ni, but Ni itself is the long reflection, internally, of these external happenings. So, in essence to be an Ni base, this type must be more pronounced in the individual than Te or Fe, but gets it's external events from Te or Fe.

  38. #38
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,659
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is ludicrous.

    You're exchanging model A with a system of plus/minus that thinks beta and alpha intuition is the same. Your idea goes against Jung's functional concepts.

  39. #39
    InvisibleJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Si vis pacem
    TIM
    para bellum
    Posts
    4,832
    Mentioned
    202 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ne-Si individuals who love categorization perspectives are always going to attempt to understand the Ni-Se action/movement/presence perspectives by applying a categorical definition and critiquing the category in which it lies when it is an irrelevant distinction.

  40. #40
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Divided View Post
    This is ludicrous.

    You're exchanging model A with a system of plus/minus that thinks beta and alpha intuition is the same. Your idea goes against Jung's functional concepts.
    No, I'm just completing the model, and I don't really care if Jung has an aneurysm over it.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •