Uncle Rob's Type (With VI!)

[Red Villain]

So I want to see a greater range of opinions concerning my type. Here's a video where I answer some questions. I want to know what you guys think.

Uncle Rob - YouTube

[FDG]

You look slightly ESTp, as first impression.

[Red Villain]

You look slightly ESTp, as first impression.

I've heard that before.

[717495]

I'd say ILI or SLI.

[Anglas]

Irational, fi valuer

[Nico1e]

I'm going with LIE for you. I feel a strong sense of a leader in you. You make a decision and tell people to do it. I can see you as my manager. I can see you looking into what's going to happen in the future and deciding what to do about it before it happens. I don't get the strong Ni wandering randomly around in ideas, but instead, a very rational feeling that you are quickly deciding things. You use Ni as your second function, not your first.

[Sumer1an]

ILI... there isnt much of a need for any serious analysis or any consideration of any other types. Assuming that is how you always are and you were being honest when you were answering your questions.

[InkStrider]

First impression is of some T type. You seem pretty nervous and first time videos aren't very good for typing, in my opinion.

[bionic]

"Not everyone listens to reason so then you have to yell at them." Hahaha..... that made me chuckle. Sometimes, it really is the only option. Have you found your enneagram type yet?

[Galen]

Your words and overall demeanor comes off as pretty Te to me. Reminds me of the user Tom in a way. I'd be more tempted to say Delta ST from what I'm seeing atm. Needs moar vids. Also don't ever lose your facial hair thx

[woofwoofl]

I had you as Te-ILI, I watched about two minutes of the video, I picked up on / themes (we confirmed this in the chatbox), and now I have you as Te-ILI

As far as you and the other Te-ILIs here, I expect much of the differences people see between you and most of them to be due to you being Dominant in DCNH as opposed to Normalizing...

[Nico1e]

wattup to me it looks like YOU are the one who does not have a purpose in lyfe and would not your job right or would not be agile enough for it (probably like the ones you talk about in the vid).you come off as someone whose constant hiding-behind-a-cig would be very annoying.you totally contradict yourself in this video. other than that,you look good! nice t-shirt =D

BTW,nice trolling Nico1e.

Uh-oh. Out of curiosity, where did I troll? Whatever I did, it was accidental.

[717495]

Reminds me of the user Tom in a way. I'd be more tempted to say Delta ST from what I'm seeing atm.

True, you also VIs similar to megadoomer. Like they were saying, you seems more physically present, explanatory (in reference to what does--tracing subjective sensory experiences or impressions with a necessary accuracy in of itself, which comes in handy for purposes) and it's not the kind you can fake really, concrete, VIs and acts physically similar to what I'd expect from delta STs. Either way I picked up on your / right from the spot, this is usually a lot easier for me.

[Galen]

(in reference to what does--tracing subjective sensory experiences or impressions with a necessary accuracy in of itself, which comes in handy for purposes)

I kinda want to know what you mean by this. What sort of necessary accuracy are you referring to?

[717495]

It's something I've heard discussed a lot and noticed myself about the Ne/Si axis. Not sure how to explain it tbh, I'm sure someone could do a better job than me. But Si seems to get caught up in the affect of the subjective factor of experience, in a way reliving and explaining all the personal specifics, even if nonsocial it doesn't always come out, once you get Ne/Si's going on a rant there are often many grouped details and varied interpretative descriptors of the same stimuli in the process of conception because field dynamics are external and these external processes are something they naturally find meaning in/attach to (and this is actually something I try to overcome a bit but is difficult being an Si user.) This looks different with the extroverted factor in EOD (Te) because of its necessity to merge with and draw from it instead of shape and proceed amongst it.

Edit: I think I wrote about this in detail before. Would be difficult to find that post.

[squark]

You remind me a ton of a guy I worked with a few years ago. Really cool, chill guy. It's weird how much the way you speak (though not the content) your expressions and mannerisms are alike. Most of the people I've worked with and spent time with have been STs I'm starting to realize (clubs ending up in the same places seems to be accurate) but I do think you're ILI instead. ILI-Te. That's more from what you said than how you said it though.

[squark]

If you go by how you come across, rather than what you're saying, I'd say ST. Since you identify with ILI, do you think that makes a difference in the kinds of things you notice about yourself and your strengths/weaknesses? IOW, are you emphasizing different things based on your self-typing?

[Beautiful sky]

LSE or SLi sounds good

How do you feel about time?

[ashlesha]

xli seems good

[Galen]

lol @ all the love he's getting from the Delta NFs

[717495]

You can be the ozzy we never had!

[EyeSeeCold]

Early 1940s/WWII French existentialist type vibes.

[Timmy]

I type you F for fucking stupid cause only a fucking retard with something to fucking prove and a lot of fucking money to burn would addict himself to fucking cigarettes.

[Galen]

I type you F for fucking stupid cause only a fucking retard with something to fucking prove and a lot of fucking money to burn would addict himself to fucking cigarettes.

[eunice]

You seem like someone who might be interesting to converse with and there seems to be a calming effect when you talk. My first impression is that you are either Te-ISTp or Si-ESTj.

[Crispy]

Best guess: LSI or ILI

[silke]

going by VI you kind of look like this guy who is ESTp

 

but based on a few other things I'd say IP temperament matches you the best

[Reuben]

Clearly SLI. All the IEE chicks here can stare in your eyes and get lost forever.

[Pa3s]

but based on a few other things I'd say IP temperament matches you the best

I agree. I haven't watched the whole video but fwiw, I'd say XLI as well.
What do you like less? Alpha or Beta?

[Red Villain]

but based on a few other things I'd say IP temperament matches you the best

I agree. I haven't watched the whole video but fwiw, I'd say XLI as well.
What do you like less? Alpha or Beta?

Alpha

[Red Villain]

I type you F for fucking stupid cause only a fucking retard with something to fucking prove and a lot of fucking money to burn would addict himself to fucking cigarettes.

I take it you were molested by a pack of Marlboro cigarettes in your childhood.

[Pa3s]

Alpha

Okay, right now you type yourself ILI. I'm curious why you say N>S and Ni/Se>Ne/Si. Not that I'd think it's wrong, I'm just interested.

[Red Villain]

Alpha

Okay, right now you type yourself ILI. I'm curious why you say N>S and Ni/Se>Ne/Si. Not that I'd think it's wrong, I'm just interested.

I just cant see myself as a sensing type; I'm not in-tune with my environment and overly detailed explanations simply turn my ears off. I work as a chef at a restaurant (out of necessity not preference) and it took me half a year to actually get "good" at my job. From my understanding sensing types are good at hands-on work which is something I find tedious and difficult.

As for the / > / thing, I simply cannot buy as my base or as my dual-seeking. I loath , and I the quality of my surroundings hardly bothers me. I often worry about my health but not to the point where I seek medical attention unless it boils to the point where I can no longer pass it off as something minuscule. What's further; I'm very willing to bet is my dual-seeking, my imagination usually consists of me being an outwardly powerful person who shows no fear in the face of adversity, someone who is actually able to follow through with what they say they are going to do. If psychology has taught me anything it is precisely because it's a quality I lack for if I was naturally like this I would see little need to imagine some alternative.

[Pa3s]

^ Thanks for that. With that in mind, ILI makes of course good sense.

Actually, I sometimes think similar about being a sensing type. I think my senses and my perception are not too sharp and I often have problems to orientate and get familiar with new places. On the other side, I often notice (e.g. artistic) details other people miss and I work fairly well wiht my hands. I often get lost in details while at work, but this could also be related to some other trait.

[Timmy]

I type you F for fucking stupid cause only a fucking retard with something to fucking prove and a lot of fucking money to burn would addict himself to fucking cigarettes.

I take it you were molested by a pack of Marlboro cigarettes in your childhood.

Wrong, I was molested by a pack of Winstons and it's no laughing matter.

Also, don't expect me to let you into the exclusive ILI club without having made sure you've paid your dues in humiliation and bloodletting. Bitch.

Naw, I'm just fucking with you.

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

You remind me of Riddy.

I seemed to have pissed you off before in a post so maybe you are Delta ST.

Or maybe you're just easily angered. Idk

Te/Fi valuing.

ISTp. Or even ESTj.

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

You seem conflicted about a lot of things.

You want to be powerful, but the powerful doesn't really kick the shyness and laziness and the weakness in other people. It protects and inspires it. Bullies are afraid they are just as sensitive as the people they target.

You want to do the right thing too- and you feel appropriately guilty if you are not nice. "I could be a nicer person." I'm glad that u admit it. I mean it.

This is where you merge the inner fag inside of you with the inner str8 man (sorry my lingo) and be a nice, compassionate person that's also powerful. Those things don't have to be conflicting opposites.

It feels good to be kind, giving and loving. It also feels good to be strong, and have a physical presence.

You know what types of people teach me that? Women. =) Powerful women. Powerful women like Xena, Buffy, Vero and Dolphin. They teach me that you don't have to choose between the two. That you can be powerful but also be kind. I'm sure girls are already attracted to your conflicted bad boy ness, but you'd drive them crazy even more knowing in your heart that you will do the right thing.

Okay this is your therapy for the day. What we don't like in others are things we don't like in ourselves, and that is true for everybody. "I don't like people who are gushingly emotional." turn that around. "I don't like myself when I am gushingly emotional." You may not be sappy, but you lose your temper too easily sometimes, and get just as passionate and intense and heartfelt as anybody else. And so it becomes a lesson in self-healing and self-forgiveness. By forgiving yourself for your gushing emotions you accept them as well as accept other people for having their desires.

AND LET'S TURN SOMETHING ELSE AROUND. "I don't like myself when I'm mean. I want to be nicer." That becomes: "I don't like when other people are mean. I want them to be nicer." It's the profound realization that other people are just as powerful as you, and you yourself are just as sensitive as them! You are worth saving as much as any girly girl with their girly feelings! Because you have them too!

It sounds corny but it really does work. Gaining fists need not to lose a heart, gaining a heart need not to lose our fists.

[InkStrider]

I just cant see myself as a sensing type; I'm not in-tune with my environment and overly detailed explanations simply turn my ears off. I work as a chef at a restaurant (out of necessity not preference) and it took me half a year to actually get "good" at my job. From my understanding sensing types are good at hands-on work which is something I find tedious and difficult.

I just want to point out a common misconception that sensing types are necessarily in tuned with the environment and good at hands-on work, because you're gonna mistype a whole bunch of people that way. I've known SEIs who suck at roads, IEIs who are great at recognizing them, and LSEs who claim to have a bad memory for them. So no, it's not type related.

As for the / > / thing, I simply cannot buy as my base or as my dual-seeking. I loath , and I the quality of my surroundings hardly bothers me. I often worry about my health but not to the point where I seek medical attention unless it boils to the point where I can no longer pass it off as something minuscule.

A lot of what you've written can't necessarily be attributed to Ne/Si devaluing.

What's further; I'm very willing to bet is my dual-seeking, my imagination usually consists of me being an outwardly powerful person who shows no fear in the face of adversity, someone who is actually able to follow through with what they say they are going to do. If psychology has taught me anything it is precisely because it's a quality I lack for if I was naturally like this I would see little need to imagine some alternative.

If you define like that, you'd mistype a number of E8s as Se/Ni ego.

The best way to know is to compare yourself to a real ILI and determine if you're anything like them. Ni egos are so terribly introverted, its... startling.

[Red Villain]

I just cant see myself as a sensing type; I'm not in-tune with my environment and overly detailed explanations simply turn my ears off. I work as a chef at a restaurant (out of necessity not preference) and it took me half a year to actually get "good" at my job. From my understanding sensing types are good at hands-on work which is something I find tedious and difficult.

I just want to point out a common misconception that sensing types are necessarily in tuned with the environment and good at hands-on work, because you're gonna mistype a whole bunch of people that way. I've known SEIs who suck at roads, IEIs who are great at recognizing them, and LSEs who claim to have a bad memory for them. So no, it's not type related.


A lot of what you've written can't necessarily be attributed to Ne/Si devaluing.

What's further; I'm very willing to bet is my dual-seeking, my imagination usually consists of me being an outwardly powerful person who shows no fear in the face of adversity, someone who is actually able to follow through with what they say they are going to do. If psychology has taught me anything it is precisely because it's a quality I lack for if I was naturally like this I would see little need to imagine some alternative.

If you define like that, you'd mistype a number of E8s as Se/Ni ego.

The best way to know is to compare yourself to a real ILI and determine if you're anything like them. Ni egos are so terribly introverted, its... startling.

I'm drawing upon what I've read from various sites. There really doesn't seem to be any consensus on what the information elements actually do, everyone has a different answer. No one seems to agree on types either. At this juncture I'm just about ready to throw socionics out the window.

[EyeSeeCold]

At this juncture I'm just about ready to throw socionics out the window.

A major factor of the problem is that we're communicating through text and not in real-time with audio & visual, but most importantly, not in-person.