Somebody kick me
Somebody kick me
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
KICK. It's not a big deal unless you base your sense of identity on it. it's just how you process information. (i guess) eh socionics = neurosis.
I know it's not a big deal, it doesn't affect me a lot...I just feel like I'm never really certain of it.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
EIE
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
TBH I don't really consider the opinions of anyone who hasn't seen me on cam/IRL at all. I realize that's hypocritical but it is what it is.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Maybe that was a bit too extreme...I mean, I DO consider other people's opinions but...meh...I can't describe my thought process Like when he just coasted in here with a typing and I know he hasn't seen me it's like and I don't take offense or think he's dumb or anything, I take it under consideration, but it doesn't REALLY make an impact on me, subjectively, if someone just says a type with no experience of me or elucidated rationale. I'm not impervious to reason, but experience is best, and blank statements do little.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You dominant, with your craving of reasoning.
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I am now.
Why I was , once.
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
I'm smiling as I read this thread, because it reminds me of something Cat would say.
I think you have a big heart deep down inside.
It's really attractive.
But you taking off your shirt and juggling torches (in a confident, straight man way. don't worry i got dis bro!) is hotter. You have the intelligence to realize that. =D
You're really likeable Gilly. You can be asshole and cutting but there's a good guy under there. I can feel it. When you're all scary animalistic male it makes me go wtf sometimes, and you don't know what you really want yet so you're just searching for a new costume that fits you exactly right. I think that's just human nature, and you will try on 32473298423292 different things until you find one that's just for you- like a drag queen needing the right exact costume for the big gala or whatever. I wish we could help you, but the whole point is it's just something that the individual has to figure out.
I think your right identity will be something you completely make yourself, I don't think it will be what somebody else thought up of. Socionic types are very interesting, but then again it wasn't YOUR idea. You know? =D
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I am now.
Why I was , once.
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
It isn't all that hypocritical because I think you actually are more insightful than most people. Don't let it go to your head though idk, but a lot of people on here are just 'denser' in ways. You have a greater sensitivity about you, a greater sense of insight... like how you could tell I was sad. I don't think it was all that obvious that I have a sad shaman's eye, because if you take my posts by face value it's hard to decipher that. Now you will probably say 'omg it was sooo obvious' in your Fire-type Gilly-ish ways. But I think it was only obvious to you, and a few other people maybe.I realize that's hypocritical but it is what it is.
Nick tried to be just as insightful as you on that thread but he missed the mark and Dolphin was too blinded by our love or something but you saw me pretty well.
But you just can't turn that insight into yourself to find your true type or whatever and its just really driving you crazy because you can't find a core to anything without it.
=D
I remember that we agreed that there would be only one gilly's typing thread.
Because he already had 50 going.
So why is this new one here?????
Please remove this thread, because it serves only as attention seeking AND it is against the rule of gilly having only 1 central typing thread.
Every administration eventually ends up with a Gilly type thread.
EIE
ILE
Assuming those are your top two atm.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Getting a girlfriend solves all type issues. If you already have one, dump her. Chances are, she isn't satisfying your socionical needs. Everyone knows that socioncs>everything else.
She is wiseWhy I love LSEs:
beyond words
beautiful within
her soul
brighter than
the sun
lovelier than
love
dreams larger
than life
and does not
understand the
meaning of no.
Because everything
through her, and in her, is
"Yes, it will be done."
Originally Posted by Abbie
You're EIE.
End of fucking story.
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
Well, if it makes you feel any better Gilly, you're a clear 3w4 sx/so. I wonder why it's easier for some people to type themselves on the Enneagram. Socionics can be difficult to type because unlike MBTI which is very simple and straightforward (lots of mistypings in MBTI). Socionics is very complex and confusing, which can make it difficult to settle on a type, however I find inter-type relations is what compensates for this deficit.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
just go typeless. way sexier
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows