Socionicsus test

[Trevor]

i get either LSE or LII

[ragnar]

http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htm

I got ILE.

[Anglas]

ESE

[Sumer1an]

Worked fine for me... I got ILI.

[Codie]

Surprise surprise I got IEI. (If you created that test thanks for not making it too long!).

[Morcheeba]

Ha I got ili.

[ragnar]

What's your type Ragnar?

Self-typing is still ILI.

[Absurd]

LSE and LIE.

[jessica129]

Eh, I get LSE

[Absurd]

ESE

Bwahaha.

[Anglas]

ESE

Bwahaha.

I got ESE just because I love esc and I want to be his dual

[Jarno]

I got LIE.

[Trevor]

-

[Absurd]

I got ESE just because I love esc and I want to be his dual

Sure, we all do.

The tree-like structure of the test doesn't seem like a good solution at all.

It works for me. Out of LSE and LIE, if I ever was in doubt, and I'm not, definitely LSE.

[InkStrider]

For those of you who have your socionics type, how close did this test get to your type?

http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htm

THIS IS IMPORTANT RESEARCH. PLEASE ANSWER AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE

I got my own self-typing.

I just gave this test to an Fe-ISFp friend and he got ESFj. He related more to A person with well-developed feelings and sentiments who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations than A person with a high level of physical awareness who is good at helping others materialize their desires and wishes.

Might have to tweak the S description a bit.

[Galen]

Got INFj. What an awful test this is.

[717495]

Didn't ask me if I'm Fi, but I went with one of the N ones (they fit the best). Can't chose. Either ILE, IEE or ILI, not the IEI one. The test is a bit shallow (maybe just a bit ).

[anndelise]

I got my type.

I find some test result responses funny...not this particular test.
It seems some people take these kinds of tests with an intent to get a particular result rather than answering what's actually applicable and then critiquing from there.

[EyeSeeCold]

Bwahaha.

I got ESE just because I love esc and I want to be his dual

Srry, but you will have to take a number.

[Exodus]

IEI

"organizing activities" sounded weird to me

[Beautiful sky]

1st answer: A person with well-developed feelings and sentiments who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations.


2nd answer: I am best at helping people take into consideration other people's feelings and sentiments.

3rd answer: I am focused more on ideals and the way people should be. I am often not very realistic.

result:

EII - Ethical Intuitive Introtim
"Humanist"
Strong functions:

Primary type message:
Being exemplary and instilling ideal values.

The one I have always been in my heart.

[Kierva]

I got IEI from that because I'm like "lolwat I really know the physical whatever shit?"

I think the phrasing can be improved.

[The Ineffable]

I got IEE instead of ILE.

[ashlesha]

i got iei. the questions are hard to answer because none of them fit me much.

[Exodus]

Hmm, if I pick the logic answer, all the rest of the questions are very good. I might change "rationally organize activities and thoughts" to "correctly understand and organize processes and systems"; just helping people to organize concrete stuff sounds too / -ish. F & S are obviously not me and the purely descriptive parts are very accurate.

[consentingadult]

For those of you who have your socionics type, how close did this test get to your type?

http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htm

THIS IS IMPORTANT RESEARCH. PLEASE ANSWER AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE

To me, the options are too generic to be able to make decent choices.

[Absurd]

For those of you who have your socionics type, how close did this test get to your type?

http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htm

THIS IS IMPORTANT RESEARCH. PLEASE ANSWER AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE

To me, the options are too generic to be able to make decent choices.

Hey adultress, how is it going, head still intact ?

[717495]

It could work if it goes "a person with well developed feelings and sentiments" and add more like "who is good expressing or thinking about them" or "good at noting close distance and relationships" but then it says "who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations." and "I am best at helping people take into consideration other people's feelings and sentiments."?

I don't get it, that's nothing to do with Fi there just a more empathetic humanitarian stereotype, who wants to 'help' people. I don't want to help people, at least not exactly like this, I would probably chose N over this. Obviously this is a different than Augusta's Socionics and Jung, as has little to do with distance and relation. I think a number of Ni dominants have stated before they don't relate to the N description.

[Absurd]

Obviously this is a different test than Augusta's Socionics and Jung. Doesn't match up very well, has little to do with distance and relation.

It is made by a guy who didn't include mesomorph, I'm really disappointed now.

[717495]

Interesting is I think from my perspective, an Ne-INFj could easily relate more to the N description of 'helping' and an Fi-ENFp could relate to the F description better. Though not necessarily Ne and Fi, since the test is too vague in defining these. In the results shown here for example, Anndelise an Ne subtype scores IEE, but two Fi subtypes score in EII. And one Ne-INFj scores as IEI and another as some N-dom, where an Fi-INFj scores EII. Just something to be noted, I think subtype can make a large difference in this kind of behavior. However I think this test has more inconsistencies than what can be explained by me, though I know if I could tweak one thing just a bit for my answer, I would select the Ne description that sounds more introverted/IJ.

[Absurd]

Interesting is I think from my perspective, an Ne-INFj could easily relate more to the N description of 'helping' and an Fi-ENFp could relate to the F description better.

It's simplistic, this way you making mistake is less probable, than with a really long test.

Of course one needs to answer truthfully