i get either LSE or LII
100% I got my type.
75% One letter off. (i.e. ILI instead of IEI)
50% Somewhat off. (i.e. you're extroverted and sensing but not feeling and judging.)
0-25% Not even close.
Worked fine for me... I got ILI.
Surprise surprise I got IEI. (If you created that test thanks for not making it too long!).
Ha I got ili.
EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962
LSE and LIE.
I got LIE.
Last edited by Trevor; 08-30-2011 at 09:51 PM.
I just gave this test to an Fe-ISFp friend and he got ESFj. He related more to A person with well-developed feelings and sentiments who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations than A person with a high level of physical awareness who is good at helping others materialize their desires and wishes.
Might have to tweak the S description a bit.
Got INFj. What an awful test this is.
"And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl
It's pretty cool
Didn't ask me if I'm Fi, but I went with one of the N ones (they fit the best). Can't chose. Either ILE, IEE or ILI, not the IEI one. The test is a bit shallow (maybe just a bit ).
Last edited by 717495; 08-30-2011 at 11:47 PM.
I got my type.
I find some test result responses funny...not this particular test.
It seems some people take these kinds of tests with an intent to get a particular result rather than answering what's actually applicable and then critiquing from there.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
"organizing activities" sounded weird to me
1st answer: A person with well-developed feelings and sentiments who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations.
2nd answer: I am best at helping people take into consideration other people's feelings and sentiments.
3rd answer: I am focused more on ideals and the way people should be. I am often not very realistic.
EII - Ethical Intuitive Introtim
Primary type message:
Being exemplary and instilling ideal values.
The one I have always been in my heart.
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
I got IEI from that because I'm like "lolwat I really know the physical whatever shit?"
I think the phrasing can be improved.
IEI. I'm pretty impressed.
I liked the "good at helping others..." bit in the first question - I think it's a critical difference between ego and super-id functions that often gets overlooked when self-typing. Otoh I only narrowly chose N-base over F-base.
I think the first question requires some insight into yourself and your friends, which might be difficult for some people. And I agree with InkStrider, "helping others materialize their desires and wishes" doesn't really sound like most S-bases I know... sounds more like a motivational speaker.
I got IEE instead of ILE.
Shock intuition, diamond logic.
The16types.info Scientific Model
i got iei. the questions are hard to answer because none of them fit me much.
Hmm, if I pick the logic answer, all the rest of the questions are very good. I might change "rationally organize activities and thoughts" to "correctly understand and organize processes and systems"; just helping people to organize concrete stuff sounds too / -ish. F & S are obviously not me and the purely descriptive parts are very accurate.
In theory there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is.
It could work if it goes "a person with well developed feelings and sentiments" and add more like "who is good expressing or thinking about them" or "good at noting close distance and relationships" but then it says "who is good at helping others adjust to people and social situations." and "I am best at helping people take into consideration other people's feelings and sentiments."?
I don't get it, that's nothing to do with Fi there just a more empathetic humanitarian stereotype, who wants to 'help' people. I don't want to help people, at least not exactly like this, I would probably chose N over this. Obviously this is a different than Augusta's Socionics and Jung, as has little to do with distance and relation. I think a number of Ni dominants have stated before they don't relate to the N description.
Interesting is I think from my perspective, an Ne-INFj could easily relate more to the N description of 'helping' and an Fi-ENFp could relate to the F description better. Though not necessarily Ne and Fi, since the test is too vague in defining these. In the results shown here for example, Anndelise an Ne subtype scores IEE, but two Fi subtypes score in EII. And one Ne-INFj scores as IEI and another as some N-dom, where an Fi-INFj scores EII. Just something to be noted, I think subtype can make a large difference in this kind of behavior. However I think this test has more inconsistencies than what can be explained by me, though I know if I could tweak one thing just a bit for my answer, I would select the Ne description that sounds more introverted/IJ.