Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: enneagram/socionics correlation method

Threaded View

  1. #1
    Punk
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    TIM
    ESE
    Posts
    1,645
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default enneagram/socionics correlation method

    hello, the following is something i came up with after seeing the decent enneagram test that Absurd posted (http://pstypes.blogspot.com/2009/11/...gram-test.html) from another thread (http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ad.php?t=36982). it would be cool to see other people take the test and use my methods to correlate a socionics type and see if this is all that accurate. as far as i can tell with the information people posted, it doesnt seem that bad. maybe you can help me make certain.


    HOW IT WORKS
    broken down into two categories using a table of functions.
    number one has a higher precedence over number two in determining an ego.
    types that have no demonstrative function are automatically removed in the types.
    1. look for duality-pairs.
    2. look for same function extratim/introtim pairs.
    3. if number 1 and 2 are too ambiguous, then use the predominant enneagram functions to discern leading and demonstrative.

    *subtypes that go outside of the two subtype system are used here to denote a person that uses their demonstrative and doesn't fit a subtype well
    *and to denote a person that has a stronger hidden agenda than their creative function.



    TABLE
    Core Functions of Type
    1: Ne, Se, Fi
    2: Si, Fe, Fi
    3: Se, Ne, Te
    4: Ni, Fe, Fi
    5: Ni, Si, Ti
    6: Ni, Se, Ti
    7: Ne, Se, Fe
    8: Se, Te
    9: Si, Fi, Fe




    Me
    5: Ni, Si, Ti
    6: Ni, Se, Ti
    result: (Ni<->Se, Si<->?, Ti<->?); (Si<->Se)
    socionics types: ILI-Ti, SLI-Ti //by rule three; no Fi excludes IEI and SEI

    EyeSeeCold
    5: Ni, Si, Ti
    9: Si, Fi, Fe
    result: (Ni<->?, Si<->?, Ti<->Fe; ?<->Fi)
    socionics types: LII-Ni, LSI-Ni //by rule three

    Typhon
    6: Ni, Se, Ti
    8: Se, Te
    result: (Ni<->Se, Se<->Ni, Ti<->?; ?<->Te); (Ti<->Te)
    socionics types: SLE, ILI-Ti, LSI-Ni //Fixed

    Sar
    4: Ni, Fe, Fi
    6: Ni, Se, Ti
    result: (Ni<->Se, Fe<->Ti, Fi<->?); (Fe<->Fi, Fi<->Fe)
    socionics types: IEI-Fe

    Poli
    9: Si, Fi, Fe
    4: Ni, Fe, Fi
    result: (Si<->?, Fi<->?, Fe<->?; ?<->Ni); (Fi<->Fe, Fe<->Fi)
    socionics types: SEI-Fe, ESI-Fi //by rule three

    Ashton
    8: Se, Te
    5: Ni, Si, Ti
    result: (Se<->Ni, Te<->?; ?<->Si, ?<->Ti); (Te<->Ti)
    socionics types: SLE-Te, LIE-Se (possible exception?)

    woofwoofl
    3: Se, Ne, Te
    2: Si, Fe, Fi
    result: (Se<->?, Ne<->Si, Te<->Fi; ?<->Fe); (Se<->Si)
    socionics types: IEE-Te, SEE-Te

    Parkster
    5: Ni, Si, Ti
    1: Ne, Se, Fi
    result: (Ni<->Se, Si<->Ne, Ti<->?; ?<->Fi); (Ni<->Ne, Si<->Se)
    socionics types: ILI-Ti or SLI-Ti

    Absurd
    8: Te, Se
    7: Ne, Se, Fe
    result: (Te<->?, Se<->?; ?<->Ne, ?<->Fe)
    socionics types: LSE-Se or SLE-Te //by rule three
    Last edited by DividedsGhost; 08-26-2011 at 12:12 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •