Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Protocol of typing: How it should look like?

  1. #1
    Yaaroslav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kiev UA
    TIM
    INTJ
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation Protocol of typing: How it should look like?

    I believe that all future versions of the protocols of typing should be roughly the same form.

    The protocol should look like: video recording, conversion of words spoken by the interviewer to lead and text: word-of-word, including words-parasites "nukaniya", "moo", "Shokan", "snorting," "sneezing" and etc. All of this should be completely converted to text. Also important is the intonation with which participants spoke.
    Then it is necessary to conduct a content analysis of what has been said in qualitative format and quantity: ie is "complex emotions" understanding only ethics but there is "light emotions" comprehensible and logic, and ethics. Of course, that in order to determine the pole typed "ethics" on the dichotomy of "Logic - Ethics" need to find these very emotional "punch" on the basis of which typed can be attributed to a given pole

    Here is some examples of my protocols:

    the text with a Maksim's talking you may see there:
    http://socionics.org/forums/thread/1577543.aspx

    Also I can represent to you my old work with such protocol


    To all:
    And remember: If you didn't received the protocol made in this way(or higher quality) - consider you typing FALSE!!!
    DO YOU CONSIDER: YOU CAN NOT MISTAKE?
    (You words - doesn't matter. The matter is - your deeds)
    Anyone who would dare argue with me should be able to pass the test on the basis of Socionics. Otherwise, he will be recognized as a boor.
    Remember: NO CONVERGENCE - NO SCIENCE!

  2. #2
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Could you be any more condescending?
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  3. #3
    Anglas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Lithuania
    TIM
    LIE-Ni 7w8 So/Sp
    Posts
    1,354
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To all:
    And remember: If you didn't received the protocol made in this way(or higher quality) - consider you typing FALSE!!!
    Not rly

  4. #4
    Yaaroslav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kiev UA
    TIM
    INTJ
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Exclamation

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    Could you be any more condescending?
    No. I should not be more condescending. I should be less condescending!!!
    DO YOU CONSIDER: YOU CAN NOT MISTAKE?
    (You words - doesn't matter. The matter is - your deeds)
    Anyone who would dare argue with me should be able to pass the test on the basis of Socionics. Otherwise, he will be recognized as a boor.
    Remember: NO CONVERGENCE - NO SCIENCE!

  5. #5
    Hiding Typhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Valhalla
    TIM
    Ni-ENFj
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hey mate, get Maritsa to roll your columns.

  7. #7
    Yaaroslav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kiev UA
    TIM
    INTJ
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Hey mate, get Maritsa to roll your columns.
    Not understood. Unknown idiom
    DO YOU CONSIDER: YOU CAN NOT MISTAKE?
    (You words - doesn't matter. The matter is - your deeds)
    Anyone who would dare argue with me should be able to pass the test on the basis of Socionics. Otherwise, he will be recognized as a boor.
    Remember: NO CONVERGENCE - NO SCIENCE!

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaaroslav View Post
    Not understood. Unknown idiom
    I said get some sweets for you look like a spanner.

  9. #9
    Yaaroslav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Kiev UA
    TIM
    INTJ
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Yaaroslav View Post
    Not understood. Unknown idiom
    I said get some sweets for you look like a spanner.
    I understood something about sweets and something about spanner, and nothing according to my theme.
    Perhaps that's was Absurd
    DO YOU CONSIDER: YOU CAN NOT MISTAKE?
    (You words - doesn't matter. The matter is - your deeds)
    Anyone who would dare argue with me should be able to pass the test on the basis of Socionics. Otherwise, he will be recognized as a boor.
    Remember: NO CONVERGENCE - NO SCIENCE!

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Yaaroslav View Post
    Perhaps that's was Absurd
    Of course, you're overestimating me.

    Anyhow, when do you get to actually type someone on here ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •