What's with your propensity for typing guys as delta STs? I mean we all have quadra bias, but I think you take it to a whole new level. What gives?
Maritsa
What's with your propensity for typing guys as delta STs? I mean we all have quadra bias, but I think you take it to a whole new level. What gives?
Last edited by Raver; 07-26-2011 at 02:01 AM.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
More like "take it to PMs" amirite
I agree, but in this case I think it is thread worthy.Originally Posted by Galen
Last edited by Raver; 07-26-2011 at 02:58 AM.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
LOL
Have you seen my list in the "What's you Typing of Forum members?" There are many people on there that aren't Delta STs
I find that it's common place for men of Introverted Sensory Thinking types to join discussions on line more that any other type. It seems to be a convenient, comfortable (Si) way of doing something without the use of a lot of energy.
I type many members as SEE and have noticed quite a few IEI members here too.
Very few ISTjs and a few INTjs as well.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lmfao, few LIIs, here...that's fucking classic...
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Hmm, I'll take a look at that list Maritsa.
Your idea about introverted sensory thinking types enjoying discussions online sounds possible, but you could make an argument for a lot of types in my opinion.
I find SEEs would be the least likely to join a forum like this. I agree with you on IEIs though.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
What's with the restraint from private messaging?
Galen already asked this and it didn't cross my mind to be honest. I got my question answered, so in the end it doesn't matter.What's with the restraint from private messaging?
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Galen already asked this and it didn't cross my mind to be honest. I got my question answered, so in the end it doesn't matter.
No offense to Galen, but I don't read all his posts.
Nor do I read every post in threads such as this.
Oh please!!! What is that anyway?Except it does matter, because you've cluttered up the new posts roster with your inane claptrap.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ummm...who cares?Except it does matter, because you've cluttered up the new posts roster with your inane claptrap.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Maritsa typed me ISTp at the start. I know she typed Hitta ESTj.
Alright.
No offense to Galen, but I don't read all his posts.
Nor do I read every post in threads such as this.
Last edited by Raver; 07-26-2011 at 03:56 AM.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
That was before you started to give me some
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think ESEs are less likely than SEEs.
I'd say they're about the same given how few of both types we have in this forum.I think ESEs are less likely than SEEs.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Ashton stop being such a bully to Traveler, he's a good guy.Except it does matter, because you've cluttered up the new posts roster with your inane claptrap.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
You don't want her take it to PMs, trust me.
ESEs join, they just get scared off in a hurry, or find something better to do.I think ESEs are less likely than SEEs.
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I amnow.
Why I was
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
How about ISFjs? this place isn't really a repository of them either.
Have you found something better to do ?
You're thinking you're LIE ?
No.You're thinking you're LIE ?
Alright.
Stupid police cares.Ummm...who cares?
Last edited by WVBRY; 07-26-2011 at 10:16 PM.
Nope, and I still am not entirely sold on being ESE.Have you found something better to do ?
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I am
Why I was
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
I was first typed LSE by her.
IEE-Ne
Okay.
333
Rawrr!
Mercutio!
Rawrr?
Well, haven't I said thatI was first typed LSE by her.activators can sometimes exceed their use of Te?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Actually the conversation at the time had more references to the shape of my neck, rather than any use of Te. The use of the rolling eye's is therefore uncalled for and unnecessary... unless of course they're directed at yourself.Well, haven't I said that
IEE-Ne
She said my neck is Te as well, then went on to type me Te polr, Se porl, Fi polr and Fe polr. 8 types in less than a month, I laughed my arse off.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
