Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: which function is more apparent in most people?

  1. #1
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default which function is more apparent in most people?

    the 3rd or the 6th?
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  2. #2
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,314
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Re: which function is more apparent in most people?

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    the 3rd or the 6th?
    Personally. I find the 6th function easier to notice, in myself & in others. though in some people it may take me some time to distinguish it as their 2nd or 6th.

    I often find myself trying to figure out if a function is their first, or if it's actually their third.
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  3. #3
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I often find myself trying to figure out if a function is their first, or if it's actually their third.
    indeed
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  4. #4
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I would think that if a function is somewhat apparent, but not one of the first two functions, that it is the third function... particularly if they're not willing to be led in that function. The 6th function welcomes direction.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    601
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I have not read a lot about functions. Second, third, sixth? What? Website links anyone?
    INFP

  6. #6
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dreamer
    I have not read a lot about functions. Second, third, sixth? What? Website links anyone?
    Nice summary: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socionics
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  7. #7
    escaping anndelise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    WA
    TIM
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp
    Posts
    6,314
    Mentioned
    205 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    I would think that if a function is somewhat apparent, but not one of the first two functions, that it is the third function... particularly if they're not willing to be led in that function. The 6th function welcomes direction.
    Welcomes it, perhaps. But people tend to utilize it extensively if there is no other "provider".
    IEE 649 sx/sp cp

  8. #8
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Naturally, people try to make their Role function seem like it's not there, and not a "problem area." People usually don't mind it if their hidden agenda is as open, especially if it's being fulfilled.

    Therefore, Hidden Agenda, or 6th function.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  9. #9
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamicism
    1st and 2nd functions are always easiest for me to notice in people. You have to be stupid for those not to be the first things that come to your attention in a person's type.
    You do know that people can often seem ambiguous in terms of the functions that they use, right? If someone were raised in an environment that naturally surpresses either their base, creative, or both of those two functions, it'll be much less obvious about what their type is. The fact that so many people mistype themselves and others supports this.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  10. #10
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamicism
    Quote Originally Posted by Kraus

    You do know that people can often seem ambiguous in terms of the functions that they use, right? If someone were raised in an environment that naturally surpresses either their base, creative, or both of those two functions, it'll be much less obvious about what their type is. The fact that so many people mistype themselves and others supports this.
    I've yet to witness this sort of phenomenon. Regardless of whatever environment a person grows up in, there's enough variety in the world for one's base and creative functions to find their natural outlet and thus make a person's type easily apparent.
    Is this why you thought that you were ENFp for a little bit?
    Is this why Joy, Peter, and Gilligan have yet to find their types, even after being here for such a long time?
    Is this why the "What's my type" forum exists?
    Is this why people seem to change their types so often?
    Is this why there is so much debating on the types of celebrities?

    People are very rarely as clear-cut as you make them seem like.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  11. #11
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    don't forget implied and msk
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  12. #12
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Joy
    don't forget implied and msk
    yeah, that too. plus anyone else whom i forgot.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  13. #13
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ashton, I said "more" apparent, not "most" apparent
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  14. #14
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamicism
    Since when did Peter have any trouble typing himself?
    peter is not ENTp
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  15. #15
    I'm back, assholes! Herzy's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    SLE
    Posts
    5,098
    Mentioned
    44 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamicism
    Is this why the "What's my type" forum exists?
    Because some people haven't figured out their types yet?
    Because their ego functions obviously aren't the most apparent. Duh.
    , Se-sub
    8w8-3w8-7w8 sx/sx

  16. #16
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Kraus, very good questions! :wink:

    Dynamicism, sorry, but you're wrong. The functions are all difficult to notice. There are often only hints of functions. After you have typed at least 2-3 people of the same type, you'll be able to see that type of behavior in other people of the same type. There are rarely clear rules how to type and there are rarely clear-cut types.
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  17. #17
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dynamicism
    Quote Originally Posted by Kristiina
    Kraus, very good questions! :wink:

    Dynamicism, sorry, but you're wrong. The functions are all difficult to notice. There are often only hints of functions. After you have typed at least 2-3 people of the same type, you'll be able to see that type of behavior in other people of the same type. There are rarely clear rules how to type and there are rarely clear-cut types.
    Yeah, you're really one to talk, being that you're flat out incapable of typing yourself and others properly - and you're one of the most flagrant examples of a person who knows nothing about the functions. And whatever it is you think you know is always wrong to an asinine degree.
    You're telling me this? haha. After saying the most stupid thing I've heard whole week! (that functions are clearly seen in people). Who the hell do you think you are?!
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  18. #18
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,625
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    My take on the function that is the most apparent: rational ego block function.

    So for rationals it's the first, the second for irrationals.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  19. #19
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    My take on the function that is the most apparent: rational ego block function.

    So for rationals it's the first, the second for irrationals.
    I think that's very often the case, perhaps most often, but not always -- for instance, in the case of dominants, especially the sensory subtypes, I think it's the that's most apparent.

    I'm not sure how to put this into a system, though.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  20. #20
    Kristiina's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Estonia, Tartu
    Posts
    4,021
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I can't really see the functions as clearly as the full image. When I look at someone, I just get a feeling - "he's the kind of person, who is easy to talk to, he is friendly and considers the feelings of others. He won't smile much, even if he is in a good mood." The more people I type, the more likely I am to read the right signals.

    For example - ENFps are easy to confuse for having a lot of . Even if it's not .
    EIE, ENFj, intuitive subtype.
    E3 (probably 3w4)

    Cool ILI hubbys are better than LSIs any time!

    Old blog: http://firsttimeinusa.blogspot.com/
    New blog: http://having-a-kid.blogspot.com/

  21. #21
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,625
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kristiina
    For example - ENFps are easy to confuse for having a lot of . Even if it's not .
    I disagree, most ENFps don't like Fe stuff at all. You might have a distorted image of ENFps. After all, think about their dual - it's unlikely that if they were Fe-alike they wouldn't get on the nerves of a Fe PoLR person.
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  22. #22
    Hot Message FDG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Freiburg im Breisgau
    TIM
    ENTj
    Posts
    15,625
    Mentioned
    155 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Expat
    Quote Originally Posted by FDG
    My take on the function that is the most apparent: rational ego block function.

    So for rationals it's the first, the second for irrationals.
    I think that's very often the case, perhaps most often, but not always -- for instance, in the case of dominants, especially the sensory subtypes, I think it's the that's most apparent.

    I'm not sure how to put this into a system, though.
    Well, yeah, it was more of a rule of thumb.

    Supposing that half of the population is rational, and half irrational, and half of the irrational are base-function subtype and the other half is creative-function subtype, this method would work 3 times out of 4.

    Strong assumptions I know
    Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit

  23. #23
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    again, I don't care which function is MOST apparent... I'm wondering if the role is more apparent than the hidden agenda... I'm willing to accept that in mature people, the hidden agenda is more apparent and in most people the role is more apparent.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  24. #24
    Expat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,853
    Mentioned
    27 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Something else - -

    Stepping a bit outside "conventional" socionics (ie Model-A centred) and shifting to the behavior-focused socionics based on Reinin and Gulenko that Smilingeyes explores, I'd say that what's most apparent is not the function, but the socionics temperament, ie:

    Whether you are

    EP, EJ, IP, IJ

    Consider -- whenever the behavior (which is what we observe IRL) of a person is described, it's fairly common to be uncertain whether someone is ENTp or ENFp, ESFp or ESTp, INTp or ISTp, INFp or ISFp, ISTp or ISFp. INTj or INFj, ISTj or ISFj, ISTj or INTj. Etc - -

    I think we usually first notice the socionics temperament of the person (EP, EJ, IJ; IP) and then we observe the Quadra values, including the ego functions.

    Please note that I'm talking of real-life observations here; when reading description it can be more difficult.
    , LIE, ENTj logical subtype, 8w9 sx/sp
    Quote Originally Posted by implied
    gah you're like the shittiest ENTj ever!

  25. #25
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    yeah, well there are things that make the whole j/p thing difficult... a j type with ADD will seem like a p type, and a p type with OCD will seem like a j type.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

  26. #26

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    USA.
    TIM
    INTj
    Posts
    4,497
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    might this be different for oneself from what it is to others? I took the original question as which function one SHOWS the most. That means, which behaviors does a person show the most to the outside world, and which function is associated with these behaviors?

    I think the answer would be a producing function, and so the 6th. (?) For oneself, one's third function is conscious and might make sense to come up more in the person's conscious thought when typing oneself, so maybe the answer might be different for typing oneself.

    However, I agree with Hugo or was it Jimmy? That said that the functions most prominent in a person's type are the first, second, and sixth most of the time.

  27. #27
    Joy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    TIM
    SEE-Se
    Posts
    24,501
    Mentioned
    57 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    good point msk. I think either/or.
    SEE-Se, 852 sx/so

    Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •