Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: MisterNi's Thoughts

  1. #1
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default MisterNi's Thoughts

    MisterNi Today 08:15 PM
    oh, I think I've figured out why in group settings, Alpha/Betas and Gamma/Deltas seem to work better.

    MisterNi Today 08:17 PM
    since alpha/betas and gamma/deltas share Ti/Fe and Fi/Te respectively they would share/appreciate each other.

    MisterNi Today 08:17 PM
    but since alpha/deltas and beta/gammas share similar worldviews through Ne/Si and Se/Ni individually alpha/deltas and beta/gamms would get along better.
    I thought it was an interesting way to look at it.

    In addition, you could probably say the difference between Accepting/Producing subtypes are Socially Connecting/Socially Ignoring(or pro-Individual).
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  2. #2
    Samuel the Gabriel H. MisterNi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA.
    TIM
    C-IEE Ne (862)
    Posts
    1,127
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for posting this! I was going to make a full post about it some time in the future.

    IEE Ne Creative Type

    Some and role lovin too. () I too...
    !!!!!!

  3. #3
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    ENTp as far as type goes.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  4. #4
    divine, too human WVBRY's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    TIM
    LSI-C™
    Posts
    6,028
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I think that when it comes to communication, alphas/betas gammas/deltas are likely to get along better, whereas when it comes to sexual relations alphas/deltas betas/gammas are more likely to get along.


  5. #5
    Samuel the Gabriel H. MisterNi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles, California, USA.
    TIM
    C-IEE Ne (862)
    Posts
    1,127
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Typhon View Post
    I think that when it comes to communication, alphas/betas gammas/deltas are likely to get along better, whereas when it comes to sexual relations alphas/deltas betas/gammas are more likely to get along.
    I don't agree with you, but thanks for your opinion.

    IEE Ne Creative Type

    Some and role lovin too. () I too...
    !!!!!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •