# Thread: Test for possession of the basics of Socionics Videos

1. ## Test for possession of the basics of Socionics Videos

This theme is devoted to a unified approach to knowledge in the requirements of Socionics.
It is proposed to test the basics of possession of Socionics.
To demonstrate that this is possible in principle, but also to inspire all who are interested in socionics, I demonstrate how he know how to solve these tasks
(yet I have only Russian version, but soon I'll do the English)

Time is money!

This results in a loss of time and spraying mental strength - while "the time (mostly men, advanced in Socionics) - money (Huge)."

So, I'm the first in the world ranking! And it's the only one!))
A bit about the history of the test. Analysing the various disputes socionists, I have repeatedly found that they were arguing among themselves, often allow themselves to "lapses" in even the most basics of basic knowledge. They also spend a lot of time is impossible to recall the interlocutor of a trait or property.

Requirements for passing test:
Tasks 1 and 2 need to be solved no more than 7 minutes.
Tasks 3 and 4 tasks need to be solved no more than 35 minutes.
Errors - are not allowed.

Requirements for registration:
Task to copy the text editor WordPad, print on A4 paper, choosing a text editor, the 12th type size with any type (TimesNewRoman, for example).
The first and second assignments to write a answers where the gaps, using standard abbreviations.

In the second task indicates the number of functions. You must specify the aspect and the dimension
"character dimension" (according to Ausra), "number" (Arabic);

In the third task:
The first corresponds to the polarity of the state "0", the second polarity corresponds to "1".
The operation "XOR" means "exclusive OR"

Example:

0 XOR 0 = 0
0 XOR 1 = 1
1 XOR 0 = 1
1 XOR 1 = 0

The task is that in this example, choose a dichotomy that as a result of the operation XOR - on the basis of these two dichotomies - the state "0" correspond to the first polarity, and the state "1" corresponded to the polarity of the second. (In the special case of this task and the signs were removed Reynins if this operation to expose the dichotomy of Jung. In this job to expose the XOR operation is required not only the dichotomy of Jung).

If you come across the task of multiplication dichotomy itself to itself - write "TIM".

Example:

Extr-Intr XOR Pers-Judj = Stat-Dina
Ques-Dekl XOR Stat-Dina = Demo-Aris
Posi-Nega XOR Posi-Nega = TIM

4. The peculiarity of the 4th task is ill-posed in that case it may be a TIM, in some cases - several, in some cases - the empty set.
Pseudonyms TIMov prescribe a 4 character - just as they are called in the task 1: TIM "Don Quixote" has 3 letters, 4-th symbol "space".
All TIMs which come in a variety of these dichotomies should be wrought.

1.Specify the relations between pair of TIMs
EII SEE ;;ILI LII ;;LSI ESI ;;SLE ESI ;;
SLE LIE ;;ESE IEE ;;LSE IEI ;;IEE LSE ;;
EIE SEI ;;LII SEI ;;LIE IEE ;;ESE ILI ;;
SLE SEI ;;EIE ILE ;;ILI LSE ;;SLE ESI ;;
SEE ILE ;;EIE LSI ;;LIE LII ;;ESE IEE ;;
LSI SLI ;;SEE IEE ;;SLI IEE ;;LIE SEI ;;
IEE SLI ;;SLE ILI ;;ILI EIE ;;LIE ESI ;;
SLI SEE ;;SLE IEE ;;SLE IEI ;;SLE SLI ;;

2. Aspect, dimensionality
SEE 3 ;LSI 3 ;ESE 5 ;EII 1 ;
SEI 8 ;SEI 5 ;LIE 3 ;ESE 4 ;
LIE 1 ;SEI 5 ;IEI 7 ;LSI 6 ;
LSE 2 ;LII 4 ;SEE 8 ;EIE 1 ;

3. What dichotomy is that?
Intuitiv-Sensored XOR Static -Dynamic
Tactical-Strategi XOR Judicius-Decisive
Intuitiv-Sensored XOR Yielding-Obstinat
Judicius-Decisive XOR Democrat-Aristocr
Extraver-Introver XOR Carefree-Farsight
Intuitiv-Sensored XOR Positivi-Negativi
Intuitiv-Sensored XOR Merry -Serious
Construc-Emotivis XOR Tactical-Strategi
Judicius-Decisive XOR Positivi-Negativi
Judicius-Decisive XOR Democrat-Aristocr
Democrat-Aristocr XOR Intuitiv-Sensored
Extraver-Introver XOR Judicius-Decisive
Extraver-Introver XOR Construc-Emotivis
Static -Dynamic XOR Extraver-Introver
QuesTIM -DeclaTIM XOR Construc-Emotivis
Positivi-Negativi XOR Democrat-Aristocr

4. Specify TIM(group of TIMs) according to the dichotomies:
Extraver,Construc,Process ,Result ,
Emotivis,Farsight,Carefree,Aristocr,
Thinking,Introver,Thinking,Aristocr,
Result ,Perceivi,Democrat,Obstinat,
Result ,Democrat,Construc,Thinking,
Aristocr,Process ,Yielding,Carefree,
Strategi,Static ,Obstinat,QuesTIM ,
DeclaTIM,Yielding,Merry ,Dynamic ,
Merry ,QuesTIM ,Negativi,Sensored,
Obstinat,Negativi,Intuitiv,Intuitiv,
Sensored,Construc,Dynamic ,Merry ,
Negativi,Thinking,Aristocr,Intuitiv,
Positivi,Decisive,Negativi,Result ,
Решающий,QuesTIM ,Carefree,Sensored,
Positivi,Intuitiv,DeclaTIM,DeclaTIM,
Process ,Obstinat,Extraver,Introver,

Variant#2
1.Specify the relations between pair of TIMs
LII ESE ;;SEI ESI ;;IEI ILI ;;EII ESI ;;
SLE LII ;;IEE IEI ;;ESE LSI ;;SEI EII ;;
IEE SEE ;;IEI ILI ;;ESE EII ;;LSE IEI ;;
EII EII ;;ESI LII ;;LIE EIE ;;LSI SLE ;;
LII LSI ;;SLE SEI ;;SLE EII ;;ILE SEE ;;
SEE SLE ;;ESI LSI ;;SEI SEI ;;ESE SEE ;;
ILI EII ;;LSI LSE ;;IEE IEI ;;IEE LIE ;;
SEE IEI ;;LSI SEE ;;SLI EIE ;;IEI ILE ;;

2. Aspect, dimensionality
LII 1 ;LIE 8 ;LSI 1 ;IEE 2 ;
LSE 3 ;SEE 4 ;LSI 2 ;EII 1 ;
SLI 5 ;SEE 7 ;LIE 4 ;SEI 6 ;
EII 4 ;SLI 8 ;IEE 6 ;SLE 2 ;

3. What dichotomy is that?
Yielding-Obstinat XOR Thinking-Feeling
Extraver-Introver XOR Process -Result
Positivi-Negativi XOR Thinking-Feeling
Democrat-Aristocr XOR Democrat-Aristocr
QuesTIM -DeclaTIM XOR Construc-Emotivis
Democrat-Aristocr XOR QuesTIM -DeclaTIM
Construc-Emotivis XOR Carefree-Farsight
Merry -Serious XOR Extraver-Introver
Static -Dynamic XOR Tactical-Strategi
Judicius-Decisive XOR Perceivi-Решающий
Perceivi-Решающий XOR Merry -Serious
Judicius-Decisive XOR Tactical-Strategi
Judicius-Decisive XOR Perceivi-Решающий
Merry -Serious XOR Intuitiv-Sensored
Extraver-Introver XOR Static -Dynamic
Thinking-Feeling XOR Merry -Serious

4. Specify TIM(group of TIMs) according to the dichotomies:
Serious ,Farsight,Result ,Решающий,
Strategi,Judicius,DeclaTIM,Process ,
Emotivis,Aristocr,Feeling ,Positivi,
Process ,Aristocr,Democrat,Emotivis,
Решающий,Extraver,Obstinat,Decisive,
Process ,Tactical,QuesTIM ,Aristocr,
Democrat,Decisive,Carefree,Perceivi,
Judicius,Construc,DeclaTIM,Tactical,
Static ,Carefree,Strategi,Dynamic ,
Introver,Dynamic ,Result ,Perceivi,
Решающий,Решающий,Perceivi,Process ,
Dynamic ,Result ,Strategi,Construc,
Yielding,Merry ,QuesTIM ,Negativi,
Serious ,Process ,Obstinat,Carefree,
Carefree,Решающий,Judicius,Judicius,
Extraver,Carefree,Result ,Carefree,

Variant#3
1.Specify the relations between pair of TIMs
ESE SLI ;;SLE ESE ;;IEE ESI ;;EIE LIE ;;
IEI LII ;;LSI LII ;;LIE LII ;;SEE SLE ;;
EIE LIE ;;SEI SLI ;;LIE SEI ;;SEI ESI ;;
EIE LIE ;;LII LII ;;SEE LSI ;;LSE ILE ;;
EII LSE ;;LSE SEI ;;ESI SLE ;;IEI LIE ;;
SEI ILE ;;SEE LII ;;LII SLE ;;SLI LSE ;;
LSI ESI ;;ESI IEE ;;EII EIE ;;EII SEI ;;
SEI SEI ;;IEE LSE ;;LII IEE ;;EII SLE ;;

2. Aspect, dimensionality
EII 3 ;SLE 6 ;LSE 2 ;LIE 6 ;
ESE 8 ;SEI 6 ;IEI 2 ;LII 2 ;
EIE 4 ;IEE 7 ;SLE 1 ;IEE 5 ;
EII 1 ;LSE 6 ;LIE 2 ;ILE 6 ;

3. What dichotomy is that?
Perceivi-Решающий XOR Construc-Emotivis
Yielding-Obstinat XOR Merry -Serious
Tactical-Strategi XOR Carefree-Farsight
Judicius-Decisive XOR Tactical-Strategi
Yielding-Obstinat XOR Static -Dynamic
QuesTIM -DeclaTIM XOR Merry -Serious
Process -Result XOR Carefree-Farsight
Extraver-Introver XOR Yielding-Obstinat
Construc-Emotivis XOR Positivi-Negativi
Static -Dynamic XOR Democrat-Aristocr
QuesTIM -DeclaTIM XOR Democrat-Aristocr
Positivi-Negativi XOR Carefree-Farsight
Static -Dynamic XOR Thinking-Feeling
Perceivi-Решающий XOR Construc-Emotivis
Construc-Emotivis XOR QuesTIM -DeclaTIM
Perceivi-Решающий XOR Tactical-Strategi

4. Specify TIM(group of TIMs) according to the dichotomies:
Thinking,Strategi,Obstinat,Решающий,
Решающий,Obstinat,Negativi,Thinking,
Process ,Construc,Feeling ,Sensored,
Democrat,Positivi,Thinking,Dynamic ,
Carefree,Yielding,Positivi,Serious ,
Intuitiv,Construc,Dynamic ,Thinking,
Thinking,Construc,Judicius,Perceivi,
Aristocr,Merry ,QuesTIM ,Carefree,
Dynamic ,Introver,Extraver,Judicius,
Introver,Thinking,Carefree,Yielding,
Aristocr,Intuitiv,Democrat,Merry ,
Tactical,Dynamic ,Intuitiv,Tactical,
Emotivis,Thinking,Serious ,Aristocr,
Result ,Tactical,QuesTIM ,Farsight,
Obstinat,Carefree,Introver,Merry ,
Merry ,Static ,Carefree,Decisive,

Those who practice with the tests and I am sure that can be tested with the specified requirements - please contact me personal message with the request for the passage of testing and then receiving a certificate in the fundamentals of Socionics.

Summary of those who believe that passing this test is not necessary for the comprehension of Socionics (although in reality he just could not pass the test):

If not solved during the given period of time job (1) - this means that the aforesaid "Socionics" has a very poor experience test (assumptions about Tim) relationships and, most likely, not even checks the current version of the TIM relationships with different people - then when it should hold at least three fairly accurately determined.

If not solved during the given period of time job (2) - this means that socionist very superficial approach to the process of diagnosis of type, and check themselves relations, which, in turn, means that its conclusions are random in nature, ie typing is not its accuracy is much greater than random.

If not solved during the given period of time job (3) - this means that socionist not versed in Reynin's dichotomies.
If not resolved during this period of reference (4) - it means the same as (3), in addition it means that Socionist no different variety of methods and ways to determine the type, which, in turn, means a substantial reduction in accuracy type.

If you're still reading this, your chances are great to comprehend Socionics))).
Please distinguished participants to comment on the merits, avoiding idle talks.
Thank you for your attention and understanding.

2. I watched your videos.
All thirty minutes of them.

I kept waiting for you to explain how you were reaching your conclusions... but you never did.

And then I read your disjointed text and still, no clear explanations as to how you were reaching
these conclusions.

The entire primes of this post is you being right and yet you offer no valid proof that you are right. You think you are right and you go on and on and on about how this can be applied, but there is no concrete proof that this is valid.

I can tell you've put a lot of thought into this though, so kudos for that I suppose.

3. Originally Posted by Yaaroslav
Time is money!
Yes. Keep it short.

4. Originally Posted by Hydrangea
I watched your videos.
All thirty minutes of them.

I kept waiting for you to explain how you were reaching your conclusions... but you never did.

And then I read your disjointed text and still, no clear explanations as to how you were reaching
these conclusions.

The entire primes of this post is you being right and yet you offer no valid proof that you are right. You think you are right and you go on and on and on about how this can be applied, but there is no concrete proof that this is valid.

I can tell you've put a lot of thought into this though, so kudos for that I suppose.
Don't understand your post. Can you explain me?

5. but what does it meannnnnnnnnnnnnn

6. Originally Posted by Galen
but what does it meannnnnnnnnnnnnn
You can ask more in detail: what exactly you did not understand?

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
•