Results 1 to 37 of 37

Thread: I am so incredibly ILI

  1. #1
    Cat Lady aixelsyd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    488
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default I Fly Like Wilma

    .
    Last edited by aixelsyd; 07-27-2011 at 04:15 PM.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI is a good typing.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2005
    TIM
    D-LSI-Ti 1w9 sp/sx
    Posts
    11,586
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Opps, I misread the topic as being created by alexsei. I rescind my statement.

  4. #4
    Your DNA is mine. Mediator Kam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Wisconsin
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    4,481
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Your obvious social anxiety, misunderstanding social dynamics, terribly passive aggressive behavior+"i have acted like a stranger to most of you for the most part". Sounds like Fe PoLR to me.
    D-SEI 9w1

    This is me and my dual being scientific together

  5. #5
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    6,724
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You need to be more active in the chatbox again, Axel. That's where I get to know people.

    ESTj
    1w2 sp/so 1-2-6
    Brilliand's Younger Sister
    Squishy's Older Sister

    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  6. #6
    from toronto with love ScarlettLux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    TIM
    Beta sx 3w4;7w8
    Posts
    3,401
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    lol this is totally my thread 2.0

    nah but seriously.. firstly can i ask why you seem SO full of hatred ?


    Dress pretty, play dirty ღ
    Johari
    Nohari

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI doesn't seem likely to me. I don't see a lot of NT emphasis. You're very concerned with how other people see you on the forum, and not so inclined to critique and debate purely theoretical points. An ILI would be opposite.

    SEE is believable, if I imagine your lines being said by Sylvester Stalone in Rocky.

    A lot is lost though in the medium of a thread. If a Gamma SF writes something about a theoretical subject such as Socionics, one's likely to see what looks like Te. Without a video, it may be harder for people to visualize.

    However, if you describe more what you're like, what things you're interested in and good at, how you go about your day, etc., perhaps people would have more information to go on....although that's up to you because if you're confident of your type, it doesn't necessarily matter what other people think.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't see ILI as a jaded, misanthropic type at all. I mean, a person might be those things and ILI also, but might not. Also, people who think that issues with others on the forum must be due to Fe-PoLR misunderstand what PoLR is. Similarly, I agree that having conflicts with others on the forum has nothing to do with being a logical type.

    Changing one's self-typing radically does confuse people though. It's understandable that people will scratch their heads, because they have so little to go on besides self typing and posts that they have read with that self-typing in mind. Nevertheless, a lot of people have done radical shifts I like. I remember Joy: SEI, then ILE, then LIE, and I think now SLE? And some others in between maybe. That's just part of the discovery process...it's not that uncommon.

    In real life, SEE and ILI are so different. The only time where they might be confused is if one has a really energetic dualized person who seems like the "full package"...and there are people like that who seem to project all 4 Gamma functions at once....usually those people are extremely driven and successful.

  9. #9
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Director Kam View Post
    Your obvious social anxiety, misunderstanding social dynamics, terribly passive aggressive behavior+"i have acted like a stranger to most of you for the most part". Sounds like Fe PoLR to me.
    What? That's BS; SEE are generally observant so they can see what's going on; they don't have to be shy and not be SEE; shyness can be overcome by anyone of any type. He could just be trying to take things in through his senses rather than participate; I think you're coining irrelevant attributes to type.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post

    Not necessarily. You can find plenty of distinctly non-intellectual ILIs. I suspect that maintaining abstract interests and what not is more a result of one's background and upbringing, not type.

    If NTs were merely about theoretical abstract shit, they'd have been killed off by natural selection many generations ago.

    Having an abstract perspective doesn't necessarily imply abstract interests. This is a key difference that's frequently overlooked.
    I agree that NTs don't necessarily have academic interests. But in a Socionics discussion, I would expect an NT to gravitate if not to the finer theoretic aspects, at least to questions about how it may be used, or whether it's valid at all. And if those issues had little interest for the NT person, then I wouldn't expect that person to hang around here.

    Actually, your post here fits NT pretty well. You're making general points about Socionics, people, etc. I don't see that emphasis coming from aixelsyd. That's all I was saying.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    It's true that I don't see her...
    Oops, sorry about the Sylvester Stallone comparison then...

  11. #11

    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    607
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    To my way of thinking, SEE fits Aix better than any other sociotype by a considerable margin. I accepted her as ILI when she self typed that way, but honestly I feel much better about viewing her as SEE.

    Also, Aix doesn't strike me as an unusually negative person. She speaks her mind plainly and pays little heed the superficial niceties over which others get all tripped and tangled up. Negative? I think not. Legit? I think so.

  12. #12
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You're ESFP imo.

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    8,578
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    Really, give me your best argument so I can have a good laugh.
    okay, i suppose that is fair given my comment in the other thread, but give me some days to make the case.

  14. #14
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    @Poli: Really? If so, you can be my dual anytime if you ever want to be ILI. You're tons of fun to wreck havoc with and the things you write are insanely funny to me. Like the one about wanting to name your dog Cassie. It was the wording and the timing and I pretty much keeled over in front of my monitor.
    Haha. I'm starting to like you ESFPs.

  15. #15

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Thanks for posting....some nice ideas. Being good at music, improv, sightreading, singing, etc. isn't specific to type. It's one of those things that it seems people of any type might have.

    However, there are definite type-related tendencies among musicians. For example, intuitive types often have trouble listening to what's actually coming out, and may have more trouble with tension. Sensing types may have to work harder on having an overall conception of the piece and where it's going.

    I once played in a trio with an SEE violinist (maybe borderline SLE). She was very energetic. Once, I accompanied her on a piece for an audition, and she insisted that I play by ear, because she wanted it to be spontaneous.

    Most SEE composers I've met tend to write something that's pretty showy and appeals to people easily. However, one may also explore one's dual function through music, so I wouldn't be surprised if the music has an Ni quality. I happen to think Liszt's music sounds SEE, although Socionists are all over the map on him (EIE and LSE are mentioned...I don't believe it). There's a certain Ni quality that comes through, as with Wagner also, but I think that can be consistent with Se.

    Your first youtube post does have an Ni quality to me. However, that doesn't rule out SEE. Just from the music itself, I might also think Beta NF as a possibility, but that doesn't mean much.

  16. #16
    ഗന᎕ᒹ ±ᗉᚔXᙂഗ woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    1,905
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    I already know Ephemeros thinks I am IEE last I checked.
    Enough said then - you're SEE

    I'll check out the videos soon and let you know, but so far, I've got valuing, Irrational, / valuing for you, you make a ton of sense to me, I like you in Gamma, more coming after I eat some food...

  17. #17
    ഗന᎕ᒹ ±ᗉᚔXᙂഗ woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    1,905
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    Currently I am trying to get into songwriting. My voice is alright (I do choral singing too but am trying to get beyond my self-consciousness about singing solo). I'm fairly good with poetry but I struggle to write lyrics.
    Holy crap, you're really good you gotta make more!

    I'm the same with words, it's easy for me to write them into a poetry thing and make it rule, but when it comes to fitting the words to the music and having it all work as a whole, that's a lot more difficult...

    If you're like me, you'll do better with the singing/vocals and all when there's a lot of people around you to fire you up with it, I can't go in if it's just me and do good, but if there's a ton of people there, I'm good to go

  18. #18
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by woofwoofl View Post
    Enough said then - you're SEE
    LOL, the thing you don't know is that I type her IEE since she was typing herself ILI. But I pardon you since you're Ne Irrational, shit happens when you see more into things than it is.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  19. #19
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    you're the one that supposedly typed themselves opposite to their real type. i don't think the burden of proof is on anyone but you where solving this conundrum is concerned.

  20. #20
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    @aixelsyd: I would have a lot to say about this but I don't want to upset you anymore and stuff. Although I disagree with quite some things you say (1) I think that unlike nanashi (2), you are a good person who got out of her ego circle and you try to understand people the way they are. Yeah, I maintain my opinion of IEE.

    (1) - including the eternal bullet-proof "they don't know me!", and deciding who's what type or who's whose Dual at the round table;
    (2) - because you're astonishingly similar at the core to me. However, she has this sort of passive-aggressive obstinacy to say opinionated things that she knows they will get a reaction from others, especially regarding what allegedly males are made of, but then pretend to be a victim of harassment. But since I give her satisfaction by reacting to her arrogant feminist shit, I consider that we are in a good relationship, me and her .
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  21. #21
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    you're the one that supposedly typed themselves opposite to their real type. i don't think the burden of proof is on anyone but you where solving this conundrum is concerned.
    I often justify my typings in high detail. The burden of proof to find me wrong is yours, who claimed "real type" out of the void. Repeating something is no proof.

    PS: I shortened my message especially for you, avoiding "unnecessary" details.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  22. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Hey Axielsyd, I'm no expert, but didn't this closet homo thing affect your typing of yourself ?

  23. #23
    Creepy-female

    Default

    I LOVE YOU AIXELSYD!!! AND YOUR MUSIC IS AMAZING





    A song for you!!



    I will give you the whole album if you want it.

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    In several ways, yes.
    Well, this is serious and I don't think it is reversible. SEE it is, although I thought only betas can be homosexual. Lesson learned.

  25. #25
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,216
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Wait, Aixelsyd is passive aggressive? When did this happen?
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  26. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    I came upon Socionics in HS and had found I was INFP in MBTI and just converted it to IEI in Socionics and stuck to that typing for many years.
    I see, that's quite interesting bit of info, I'll drink to that.

    So while it did lead me to compartmentalize my life for my own personal safety (she like many others who got found out or came out had to deal with nearly being kicked out of home or kicked out, being controlled to change, and abuse, and a lot of things which I know a lot of people have gone through and didn't know what to expect if I was ever found out and assumed it would be the end of me if that happened when it did)
    They don't kick out of school, home, call police for alcohol abuse anymore. What is going on with this world ?

    Oh, and in regards to the IEE thing
    I don't have a problem with you being SEE at all. IMs fit, quadra fits, temperament fits, etc, go with it. Just this homosexual thing, I thought only betas are homosexual, no offence betas. No haha, it was intentional.

    Anyway, good luck and take care.

  27. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    18,006
    Mentioned
    162 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Absurd View Post
    Just this homosexual thing, I thought only betas are homosexual, no offence betas.
    haha
    No really, when I saw a homosexual on the street I thought beta instantly, when I took a puff off a fag I thought beta. What's wrong with me ?

  28. #28
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Ineffable View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    you're the one that supposedly typed themselves opposite to their real type. i don't think the burden of proof is on anyone but you where solving this conundrum is concerned.
    I often justify my typings in high detail. The burden of proof to find me wrong is yours, who claimed "real type" out of the void. Repeating something is no proof.

    PS: I shortened my message especially for you, avoiding "unnecessary" details.
    1. post was not directed at you.
    2. "real type" was claimed by OP.
    3. WFT are you talking about this time..?
    4. don't respond to this post.

  29. #29

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    It was a very powerful connection. Years later in college when I realized I was Te/Fi, I came to realize her type and came to think this was related to duality. I certainly did play the role of the ILI when around her (crass, sardonic).
    This ties into a theory I have that maybe we don't have types at all...we just have types relative to other people. At least in myself, I tend to play the roles of different types when I'm around certain people. Sometimes I think that rather than having fixed types, we just have a greater or lesser ability to play certain type roles. Certainly being around a strong personality, I find myself turning into that person's dual to some extent, although I'm not able to play the roles of all 16 types.

    So for example, around this person who played the role of SEE very well, that made you ILI. Perhaps around a stronger ILI, you would be SEE in comparison, and if you had an SLE friend, then you might be more IEI, possibly.

  30. #30
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    1. post was not directed at you.
    2. "real type" was claimed by OP.
    3. WFT are you talking about this time..?
    4. don't respond to this post.
    I misread that, sorry. Blame conditioning to your posts, I usually don't need to read them carefully to know what you have to say.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  31. #31

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    ...found I was INFP in MBTI and just converted it to IEI in Socionics and stuck to that typing for many years. I saw no reason to question it....
    .... made me realize...things.

    Like before I had nothing to motivate me. .... had few friends. A lot of people didn't like me. But for some reason she motivated me. It got me to start caring about who I was and my place in the world bit by bit. Because she cared, showed it in her own half-assed way, and believed in me and understood me better than most anyone...it was that sort of thing.
    .... I did come more and more out of my shell and cared about where I was and wanted to be seen, heard, and noticed. ....

    It was a very powerful connection. Years later in college when I realized I was Te/Fi, I came to realize .....
    One other thing I was thinking, on the hypothesis that fixed types do exist in some sense....

    It might help if we understand whether SEE really fits you all the way, or if it was a deduction based on:
    * believing that you prefer Te/Fi over Fe/Ti
    * Seeing that you're more emotional than ILIs.

    I'm not saying this to dispute your self typing of SEE, but the way you write about a process of realizations about life sounds a lot like IEI to me. I can imagine an IEI being someone with few friends and finding an Se who helps her believe in herself and going through a long journey about a reflection on who she is and the meaning of life, and her place in the world, and finally coming to some sort of realization "I'm an SEE!" But I can't imagine an SEE doing that.

    Most SEEs are pretty straightforward to type. They're usually popular and energetic, don't mind doing all the practical stuff, and usually not really reflective about the meaning of life, nor tending to have some dynamic-type process of continuous self-discovery.

    Also, your talking about playing the "jaded, misanthropic" role actually sounds like IEI more than ILI. An emotion of jadedness and being misanthropic is actually a kind of Fe. An IEI imitating an ILI might do so with that sort of sarcasm, etc., and an Fe type might think the ILI is being jaded and misanthropic, but in the ILI's mind, he/she's just being logical.

    Keep in mind that even the "experts" tend to disagree a lot on Xi vs. Xe. I mean they can never get them straight...just look at how frequently famous Socionists put famous people into opposite quadras. So many people take the MBTI and come out INFP and are able to see how they have Fi, and it makes sense, then in Socionics many of those people are IEI and find that they have Fe, and then they realize that that makes sense too, when you think of the functions in a different way. Everyone has different definitions, and it's not as straightforward as it would appear at first.

    Anyhow, I'm not saying this to doubt your type, and of course all of this is prefaced on the assumption that types exist in the first place.

  32. #32

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,969
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting. I don't know about most of those people, except Dustin Hoffman, whom some people type ILI and others LII. I'm not much into VI, myself.

    One thing I wonder....When most people here change their self-typing, they believe that their type has remained the same, but only their understanding of it changed. However, there was a forum member named Smilingeyes who believed that his type changed from EIE -> LIE -> LSE, or something like that. When he announced that he was LSE, he wasn't saying that he always had been LSE; rather, he was becoming LSE at that moment, and had previously been those other types.

    I'm wondering in your case if you feel you actually were base-Ni and journeyed to SEE, or if you feel you were SEE all along. I believe it is possible for a base-Ni person to go into an Se state, which exists sort of on top of the base-Ni and takes over, sort of how you described. But in that case, the person is really base-Ni in the past, and has become SEE.

    It is sort of a continuous life development, perhaps a sort of destiny.

    That (or an SEE developing an Ni side), on the other hand, is very different from someone developing a little bit of his/her dual side, which looks very different to an outside observer. For example, I know an IEE, and he's developed certain aspects of Si and Te through hobbies and interests, but remains an IEE and would never be confused with an SLI.

  33. #33
    ഗന᎕ᒹ ±ᗉᚔXᙂഗ woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    1,905
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by aixelsyd View Post
    It was a very powerful connection. Years later in college when I realized I was Te/Fi, I came to realize her type and came to think this was related to duality. I certainly did play the role of the ILI when around her (crass, sardonic).
    This ties into a theory I have that maybe we don't have types at all...we just have types relative to other people. At least in myself, I tend to play the roles of different types when I'm around certain people. Sometimes I think that rather than having fixed types, we just have a greater or lesser ability to play certain type roles. Certainly being around a strong personality, I find myself turning into that person's dual to some extent, although I'm not able to play the roles of all 16 types.

    So for example, around this person who played the role of SEE very well, that made you ILI. Perhaps around a stronger ILI, you would be SEE in comparison, and if you had an SLE friend, then you might be more IEI, possibly.
    I've been thinking about that a ton myself

    Around a fellow SEE girl, I end up more oriented to ILI then than I do on average, and I may be closer to SLI than I usually am when I'm with the Alpha quadra musicians... whatever people need out of me, they'll usually get to some degree, unless it's something that involves massed amounts of or , I can't do that...

    As far as I'm concerned, people have eight functions, with potencies that differ as time goes forwards and situations rearrange themselves; they usually align in the manner appropriate for their type, sometimes not, and I don't see it impossible for a line to get hopped here and there as far as type is concerned - people grow in all sorts of ways...

  34. #34
    Grand Inquisitor Bardia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,258
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For whatever it's worth I tend to think of you as a gamma introvert. I think you could possibly be my identical. Mirror isn't out of the question though, especially since I have never met you. I do feel like I often times agree with you and understand your train of thought.
    “No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov

    http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
    http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0

  35. #35
    silke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    Ni-IEI sx/sp
    Posts
    3,779
    Mentioned
    317 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    just from posts in this thread you do sound like a static type rather than dynamic such as ILI, and Fi valuing - SEE/ESI would be good guesses

  36. #36
    Haikus
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    MI
    TIM
    IEI-Ni
    Posts
    10,060
    Mentioned
    223 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    TBH, socionics is like deep and complicated (that's why it's really interesting imo) and you're just sorta like skimming on social-behavioral stuff. Which no offense (you're not doing anything wrong and I like you), it's just...well, surface-y. What you're saying sounds like it could be anything. It's a balance though, you're probably afraid if you go any deeper, you will scare people away socially. I have this same fear. =( But socionics has a lot of technical depth to it that makes it quite interesting.

    You do come across like you have some social uneasiness but you understand those feels aren't rational or sane or whatever and you quickly get over them. You're just a little people-shy I think and honestly it's really attractive and cute. If more people admitted this or something, the world would probably be a better place. I mean, a lot of people end up getting hostile and aggressive as a way to cover up their 'nerdy qualities.'

    You're not *exactly shy* but you are a little shy. Most of us here are that way so I think it's like a support group. People who are the opposite kinda easily make friends wherever they go and have a LOT of people following them and are all preppy and popular and shit. We're just not like that. We're just like the losers on the other side. But that's why we're family. =p

  37. #37
    Hiding Typhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Valhalla
    TIM
    Ni-ENFj
    Posts
    2,645
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You are SEE. Too moody to be Te ego IMO.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •