Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Question about subtypes

  1. #1
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,127
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Question about subtypes

    To start, i believe myself to fit within the IEI arch-type, and i've been reading lots of different sub-type theories.

    Within myself I'd rank my Strengths in this order

    With the DCNH - Would Normalizing refer to Fi and not Ti since i test as an F. Or could it be either? Is there a way to differentiate, or is that not even necassary for that sub-type label?

    Next - Dual type theory - How does one come about understanding what their 2nd type would be? For instance i feel i have stronger Ti than most IEI's and that i also value Fi more than most IEI's(that i know). But i cant think of a type that has Ni, Ti, and Fi in valued positions OTHER than the IEI itself.
    So what becomes the criteria for determining it?

    And is there only specific types that can be Dual typed together? Can someone be an LSE-IEI? How would that even make sense? Is there a limitation to what an IEI's dual type could be?

    Any information would be valued. Thanks a ton.

  2. #2
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,618
    Mentioned
    632 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    dcnh is confusing but my understanding is that normalizing would be a more IJish type of IEI...i think per the theory this would be strengthened Fi and Ti but i'm not sure how that works since those two elements oppose eachother. you could also type yourself IEI-Fi but that wouldnt be dcnh (i think its the 8-subtype model or something).

    i think you could have any dual type and it has to do with your interests and persona? tcaud and crazedrat know more about that, i dont understand it.

  3. #3
    ഗന᎕ᒹ ±ᗉᚔXᙂഗ woofwoofl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Southern Arizona
    TIM
    x s x p s p s x
    Posts
    1,906
    Mentioned
    226 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    To start, i believe myself to fit within the IEI arch-type, and i've been reading lots of different sub-type theories.

    Within myself I'd rank my Strengths in this order

    With the DCNH - Would Normalizing refer to Fi and not Ti since i test as an F. Or could it be either? Is there a way to differentiate, or is that not even necassary for that sub-type label?

    Next - Dual type theory - How does one come about understanding what their 2nd type would be? For instance i feel i have stronger Ti than most IEI's and that i also value Fi more than most IEI's(that i know). But i cant think of a type that has Ni, Ti, and Fi in valued positions OTHER than the IEI itself.
    So what becomes the criteria for determining it?

    And is there only specific types that can be Dual typed together? Can someone be an LSE-IEI? How would that even make sense? Is there a limitation to what an IEI's dual type could be?

    Any information would be valued. Thanks a ton.
    With the DCNH:

    and - Dominant
    and - Creative
    and - Normalizing
    and - Harmonizing

    Both and would be taken into account for DCNH, and under the system of Accepting and Producing subtypes (the two type system), , , , and would all count as an subtype for IEI looks like you would be N-IEI for DCNH...

    Dominant subtypes are said to somewhat supervise Harmonizing subtypes, Creative subtypes do this to Dominant subtypes, Normalizing do this to Creative, and Harmonizing to Normalizing - types that don't correct each other in this manner are said to get along a bit more smoothly overall, and if you're N-IEI, this would be fellow Normalizing subtypes and Dominant subtypes (these would be subtype equivalents of Identity and Duality respectively, instead of Supervision)...

    As for dual-type theory? I'm still a bit new at this, and though I may have done this incorrectly, here's what I did - I took my stronger function out of and (me being Harmonizing was why I did this), and I went to the Extraverted Judging function (to create a complete type) that I was stronger in, which was ... once again, if I did this incorrectly (and I don't think I did), it should only be a matter of time until you're pointed in a better direction

  4. #4
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,025
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    With the DCNH - Would Normalizing refer to Fi and not Ti since i test as an F. Or could it be either? Is there a way to differentiate, or is that not even necassary for that sub-type label?
    DCNH works well in my opinion and is a lot less confusing than the producing/ accepting subtypes IMO. but it takes some time to figure out how it manifests itself in real life. Knowing and observing a lot of people of the same type helps alot. But I think the pattern is there. They are strengthened in pairs, like Ti and Fi. It doesn't matter what your main type is. I don't know why DCNH works, but as a phenomenon I agree with it.

    The names Dominant etc. are labels that give some hints, but they should not be taken too literally.

    http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p..._DCNH_Subtypes

  5. #5
    "Information without energy is useless" Nowisthetime's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    near Russia
    TIM
    SEI
    Posts
    1,025
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    DCNH is lame. Especially if Nowisthetime believes in it.
    I didn't know my opinion was so powerful. It would be interesting to know why you don't like DCNH, but you have probably discussed it in earlier threads? I'll do a search sometimes.

  6. #6
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Berlin
    TIM
    LSI 5w6 sx/so
    Posts
    5,421
    Mentioned
    144 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pookie View Post
    To start, i believe myself to fit within the IEI arch-type, and i've been reading lots of different sub-type theories.

    Within myself I'd rank my Strengths in this order

    With the DCNH - Would Normalizing refer to Fi and not Ti since i test as an F. Or could it be either? Is there a way to differentiate, or is that not even necassary for that sub-type label?

    Next - Dual type theory - How does one come about understanding what their 2nd type would be? For instance. Bi feel i have stronger Ti than most IEI's and that i also value Fi more than most IEI's(that i know)ut i cant think of a type that has Ni, Ti, and Fi in valued positions OTHER than the IEI itself.
    So what becomes the criteria for determining it?

    And is there only specific types that can be Dual typed together? Can someone be an LSE-IEI? How would that even make sense? Is there a limitation to what an IEI's dual type could be?

    Any information would be valued. Thanks a ton.

    - you have very low Ti (compare yourself to the right ppl -- aka Silke or Strrng -- if you wanna see Ti that kinda overtakes Fe).

    - and totally devalued Fi (you have no clue about what is important to you or other ppl, the group dynamic has priority over anything else ...basically you're kinda all about fun and laughing around, which is Fe)
    Last edited by Amber; 05-13-2015 at 12:51 PM.

  7. #7
    The sleeping beauty Velvet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    302
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Amber View Post
    - you have very low Ti (compare yourself to the right ppl -- aka Silke or Strrng -- if you wanna see Ti that kinda overtakes Fe).

    - and totally devalued Fi (you have no clue about what is important to you or other ppl, the group dynamic has priority over anything else ...basically you're kinda all about fun and laughing around, which is Fe)
    Does this make him IEI-Fe aka dominant subtype according to your analysis?

    Make me think that I am probably the creative subtype.

  8. #8
    Pookie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 6w5-9-2 So/Sx
    Posts
    2,127
    Mentioned
    89 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    If so, it's wrong.

    It's been 5 years but I understand these questions now.
    I would say that ethically you are still supposed to act as if you have unilateral responsibility; but simultaneously you have to be able to see the other as a fully autonomous, free, aware person.

    Medicalizing social problems has the additional benefit of rendering society not responsible for those social ills. If it’s a disease, it’s nobody’s fault. Yay empiricism.

  9. #9
    Queen of the Damned Aylen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    MACS0647-JD
    TIM
    SEER ~ 458 sx/sp
    Posts
    9,893
    Mentioned
    732 Post(s)
    Tagged
    40 Thread(s)

    Default

    I remember when a couple of people were into figuring this stuff out and they told me I would be the IEI-IEI type, whatever that is. I don't really pay attention to subtypes though.

    "When I ought to be thinking of heaven he will nail me to earth"

     







Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •