to type this person
HERE IS YOUR NEXT SHORT TERM LIFE GOAL:
to type this person
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh, LSE?
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
thank you for your response,Crispy.Could you please elaborate on explaining how you excluded Ne ego?
He strikes me as being-dominant, on the basis of his factual and unimaginative style of speaking; I would also guess that LSE is more probable than LIE.
SLI or SEI
He's not tense enough to be LSE
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 06-29-2011 at 03:41 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That guy is not LSE. He looks more scattered than inert, references sources too much, and seems more biased towards experiencing reality thru a roadmap, instead of direct experience.
I vote for SLI.
IEI-Fe 4w3
yeah,SLIs are chaos impersonated.
The guy makes sense.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I think Te Irrational. Te Rationals are not that verbose, repetitive and especially redundant in order to like "transfer" their unspeakable idea to you, like Irrationals do. Or giving many examples. In a way I think I see your point, is is maybe that manner of selecting the possibilities "that matter" to build their idea - for instance he assumes that only mistakes can happen in copying, though he ignores (or does he? maybe he just pretends so) other things that may happen, like intentional modifications, personal agendas, etc. Pretty much removes the "irrelevant". Though IME Te Rationals are more matter of fact and spend far less time explaining the background than with the conclusion and what's there to be done about it.
He strikes me as being
SLI I think
Lol, I don't have a point; in fact, when I type people, I generally have no idea what I'm talking about. If I'm able to beat a 16-sided die in terms of typing accuracy, it's a job well done for me.
Don't be so ostentatiously modest, I was trying to make up an excuse for youLol, I don't have a point; in fact, when I type people, I generally have no idea what I'm talking about. If I'm able to beat a 16-sided die in terms of typing accuracy, it's a job well done for me..
Very analytical. I liked the videos, watching all 10 of them now in that lecture.
I did too. LOLVery analytical. I liked the videos, watching all 10 of them now in that lecture.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
