Hi. I'm here to get new information and other valuable stuff. Personality types is quite interesting and new for me. My personality type is ESFP. I don't know what to say more And one more thing what is these symbols means
Hi. I'm here to get new information and other valuable stuff. Personality types is quite interesting and new for me. My personality type is ESFP. I don't know what to say more And one more thing what is these symbols means
Oh hell yeah - a fellow SEE! welcome aboard!
As for the symbols:
our 1st (dominant) - - Extraverted Sensing
our 2nd (creative) - - Introverted Feeling
our 3rd (role) - - Extraverted Intuition
our 4th (vulnerable) - - Introverted Thinking
our 5th (suggestive) - Introverted Intuition
our 6th (mobilizing) - Extraverted Thinking
our 7th (ignoring) - Introverted Sensing
our 8th (demonstrative) - Extraverted Feeling
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Welcome to T16T.
The 8 Functions
IRRATIONAL FUNCTIONS (sensing and intuition).
Extraverted intuition is also called Intuition of Possibilities, or Intuition of Potential.
Introverted intuition is also called Time Intuition.
Extraverted sensing is also called Volitional Sensing, or Space-capturing Sensing.
Introverted sensing is also called Comfort Sensing, or Space-settling Sensing.
RATIONAL FUNCTIONS (logic and ethic).
Extraverted logic is also called Processual or Practical Logic.
Introverted logic is also called Systematic Logic, or Structural Logic.
Extraverted ethic is also called Emotional Ethic.
Introverted ethic is also called Ethic of Relations.
More information here, with examples of people who represent the functions(/types):
http://www.socioniko.net/en/articles/lytovs-intro3.html
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Welcome Anglas!
Thanks for this, now I know that I'm
I readed Myers Briggs - Speed Reading People book, but such things like these symbols weren't there. One more question what is means these 3w2 so/sx or 1w2 sp/sx 1-6-2 and so on ? Sorry for band english and offtopic
Welcome!
Well ESFp is actually , though according to Model A, and are the strongest functions, but that may be a bit confusing if you're just being introduced to the theory.
Anyway, ESFp is .
The symbols are exclusive to socionics.
That's enneagram. It's somewhat confusing notation.One more question what is means these 3w2 so/sx or 1w2 sp/sx 1-6-2 and so on ? Sorry for band english and offtopic
"1w2 sp/sx 1-6-2"
1w2 means that they are an ennegram type 1 with type 2 support.
"sp/sx" is instinct self-preservation first, sexual second, and social(so) last.
1-6-2 represents the tritype fixations the person has in each of the gut/head/heart centers.
You might want to look at the enneagram institute website for an introduction to the enneagram.
Welcome to 16chan. Ignore anything that I or EyeSeeCold have to say.
These are socionics symbols. As it happens, this isn't an MBTI site, and anything you readed - or even read - about that typology is not supposed to necessarily match socionics. Just FYI.
Hello and welcome
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
PROVE IT
hi :3
well firstly my MBTI was ESFP, I think I did test 3months ago . All the time believed about one thing, that I'm Feeling type. When I was deep in this thing, I quickly found out that I'm Extrovert, because I hate to be alone and don't get all attention is intolerable to me. Never knew am I sensing or intuitiv till I started to watch other people. I can't imagine anything, my speech is different from intuitives, they just unlike me. J or P was hard too, because I rarely late, but I don't like making decisions and my room is always a mess. So I get ESFP and when I was reading description, every sentence was true.
I'm a new guy in this thing and don't know many things. Is there a different between ESFP and ESFp?
anglas,did you participate in a mathematics olympiad?
Last edited by Kalinoche buenanoche; 06-07-2011 at 11:24 PM.
In many cases, yes! Here's a breakdown of how things went in one particular study (it's in EyeSeeCold's link):
As you can see, the MBTI types and the Socionics types didn't always neatly line up - for 9 out of 16 types, it was most likely for a particular MBTI type to be the same Socionics type than any other particular Socionics type... there's a lot of neat little patterns though:
INTP usually equaled LII (INTj)
INTJ usually equaled SLE (ESTp)
ENTJ usually equaled SLE (ESTp)
ESTP usually equaled SEE (ESFp)
ESFP usually equaled IEE (ENFp)
ENFP usually equaled EIE (ENFj)
ENFJ usually equaled IEE (ENFp)
Looking at your post gave me the impression of Causal-Determinist cognition, which makes me more certain of you being SEE (ESFp)... by the way, if you nail a cognitive style, you can narrow things down to one type per quadra, which can be very useful
Be sure to give the Reinin dichotomies a look! Quadra boundaries are drawn by the Merry/Serious and Judicious/Decisive dichotomies, and getting a feel for the quadras is a very good idea...
Also, socionics.com has alright stuff as far as intertype relations are concerned (the site, as a whole, isn't too great - I'd take the physical descriptions part with a grain of salt) - the type relations calculator is great for committing them to memory!
While I'm at it, here's a video of a definite ESE Alton Brown and a highly probable SLI (Ashton typed him SLI, and it seems to fit well) David Letterman interacting with each other - the particular relation between them would be Supervisory - notice how the usually at-least-semi-confident Dave doesn't seem like he's even comfortable in his own skin here, fumbling all over the place and everything?
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
I made a post on this a month ago, about Keirsey's duals, being XOXX, basically only N/N and S/S in common. It didn't equate very much to Socionics. I put the full two-way type translations there with their duals (start from within the parenthesis. Starting from outside the parenthesis is the result and yields in web gravitation, ie. there are two INTPs, one must go to ILI):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...7&postcount=57
Awesome thanks this means that I should probably make another one then
Awesome Anglas, I think so too!
As far as being supervised by Logical Introtims, that would make sense - our Supervisors are LSI (ISTj), and our Conflictors are LII (INTj)
Here's video of some definite LSIs (I'm pretty sure of the first two as being Se-LSIs in particular):
- Judge Judy (a nice example of Causal-Deterministic cognition in this one)
- Gordon Ramsay (notice Gordon's Se focus versus the fellow in the glasses' Si focus)
- Chris Langan (loads of Ti from this guy)
Here's a Chris Langan quote:
In my personal experiences, I've never felt intensely uncomfortable around LSIs, though I do generally come off a bit dopier than I actually am to them I think different types of Supervision have different levels and types of intensity depending on the specific types (as well as subtypes, and people, for that matter) involved in them, and from an overall perspective, Supervision isn't too great for anyone involved, especially the Supervisee...Originally Posted by Chris Langan
And gotta save the best for last here - you want type interactions, you got 'em! here's an ESE Lars Ulrich, an SEI Kirk Hammett, and an LSI James Hetfield - Lars and Kirk are Mirrors, Lars and James are Semi-duals, and Kirk and James have relations of Benefit, with Kirk being James's Benefactor... so without further ado:
Some Kind of Monster - parts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18
P.S. I think Robert Trujillo's an SLI - not completely certain, but it really looks that way to me...
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
oops
Greetings