Romancing styles - "victim" males
Victim males How do you act with women.
If im enfj then
Personally i act like aggressor. If see someone interesting i start chasing and harrasing her, and try to get her see my positive value and will to have her. Now im trying to get an infp girl, but as i have just started to get on the meds so i shouldnt really leave this place. Im being 50% and 50% about leaving. As i think i dont really care about the danger. Actually its a bit thrilling
I think the boy that I ended my relationship with must be a victim male.
He behaves much like you mentioned. And I'm just like "please, stop"
and he then continutes to ask me about a hundred and fifty questions about that which I do not wish to speak of. I try to be reasonable. I try to explain that I have no answers, that I have nothing to say on these subjects, that I don't acknowledge them, I do not give them my time, I do not think about them. At all. Forty seconds later,
him: "what would you like to have a constructive conversation about?"
me: "I have no preference as long as no one gets upset or hurt or angry or vicious."
him: "so what do you think would help us?"
... seriously? Just stop.
He then gets mad at me for being unresponsive. I have nothing to say. If that's all you want to speak of you will reach a wall and then you will talk about non stop for months. You do not respect my wishes you do not think of anyone but your selfish wants.
/rant
So you would rather liked to be punched in your face, and taken the hard way than have a conversation. Thank you i think i understandOriginally Posted by Hydrangea
But yeah i think that is a good description
i seem to only attract victim males. the word i want to use is "provoking," i feel they try to pull things out of me, though not overtly. i feel like the more active one, but it's very reactive to them and what they're doing.
if it's a good relationship, i barely notice the provoking of me i mentioned. it's just natural back and forth.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
I would much rather be punched in the face until I died.
We could make a good couple. Whats your phonenumber ?
WHO ARE YOU! What do you want to achieve ?
nothing in particular
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
accomplishments are transient
re OP: passively draw in (the energy really seems to only align with beta STs). pursuing objects of desire = pushing away.
4w3-5w6-8w7
hah just noticed the rest of the title, "Those little suckers" ... how true.
maybe a saint is just a dead prick with a good publicist
maybe tommorow's statues are insecure without their foes
go ask the frog what the scorpion knows
Ooh, yes, this is good. People are always leaving little threads poking out of their metaphorical life-sweaters and it's always so tempting to just tug on those and unravel the whole thing.
Anyways, as to how I act with women... I really don't. I don't really know any single women that are worth acting on. Not that I'm some prize catch or anything, it's just that you can usually just look at someone and realize, "Any relationship I have with this person will probably be unrewarding and short-lived." And, really, no relationship at all is probably better than unrewarding and short-lived.
You dont really know it. Unless you yourself are the reason why the relationship is gonna go crap. All these sound like a rationalization upon why you dont do anything. Take a change. Have some fun. Learn something. ANd prepare to be surprised
This is... interesting. Do you mean, like, actively playing hard to get? Or is it more of, like, a subconscious repellation in the hopes of meeting someone who likes you so much they overcome it?
I think its about being unsure of theyr interest and having tests and plays to see if the person is worth the effort.
Well, I mean, of course I don't really know, and maybe I'd have more fun than I think I would. And yeah, I'm probably a shiftless pussy when it comes to these things, but really, looking at most people you can generally feel out whether or not you'd enjoy their company and whether you could really get close to them.
I mean, of all the could-be romantic relationships I've had, most of them were just really hollow and transient and superficial... There was only, like, this surface level thing going on and no real depth that warranted getting in closer. I mean, you can only drink so many coffees and have so many empty conversations before you just get tired of it.
So lets imagine this conception of depth. You find it real. So the reason not having it has been because either you lacked that depth and you needed it also or you had difficulty connecting with the other person. Or the other person lacked the depth, which means that such conception of depth as it lives in you it lives somewhere else in the human psyhce meaning that its probably more developed in other individuals and there is no reason not to chase for it. Im allways surprised upon how much variety we do actually posses. So theres actually no reason not to go on experimenting more im sure you would find your conception of depth and fullnes.. If not the way you expect then in another way. In anyway its not like you have better things to do. Not all time atleast
You are the master of your ship after all. So there is no reason to chose to live your in an empty and unsatiesfied ways. The earth is filled with fruits and gifts to those who are courageous enough to pursue them
as if the control we grant aggressors isn't purposive
no, not hard to get; I hate that attitude in anyone. I just keep a neutral distance from people, it helps clarify how much magnetism there is. and yeah, I sort of expect that a female with a certain level of intelligence/self-awareness will grasp the implicit before interaction occurs. otherwise I just feel like I'm wasting time running through a program whose output I already know, which negates any respect I could have had for them.
4w3-5w6-8w7
lol too true
4w3-5w6-8w7
Ooh, right, I remember these! The Beta NF one seems very applicable.
You know, if someone were to tell me that the "depth" I'm looking for is unobtainable and that I'm a pretentious twat with unrealistically high standards, I would probably believe them.
But that's ok.
And yeah, you're right. Most people do have a developed inner life. Most people have, on some occasion, explored "the depths." But most of the women I've dated seem so cut off from that. Like, they don't want to talk about anything too personal or too uncomfortable. They just want to have fun and talk about cheery bullshit. And that's fine. I can talk cheery bullshit and chug coffee with the best of them. But it seems like the only reason they're there with me is to have fun.
And this sounds really weird and doesn't make any fucking sense at all, but in a way I don't really want to just have fun. I mean, in a relationship I'd like to have fun, of course, but, I'd rather that be, like, the context under which the relationship takes place rather than the entire reason for the relationship in the first place. A means to an end rather than the end itself, so to speak.
I really wanted an explanation, but it's obvious you don't want to give me one.
Really, not even a brief message?
I guess I'm not going to get that last conversation.
I trusted you with my insecurities, and now you used them against me.
Really, nice move not letting me know anything, while you know I desire to understand situations,
and I keep endlessly dwelling on them.
Sure, in your mind you'll justify it with: 'He said things I didn't like so I can make him feel bad'
You managed to push away a person who sincerely cared for you.
You're quite a self-centered individual, and you have managed to prove me wrong.
You're just like everyone else after all.
Liar.
I blocked him on an instant messenger.
He told me not to tell him my schedule/what I was doing. So I didn't.
A guy said that?
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
/thread
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
I'm glad you broke that off!
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Me too, if only he would leave me alone/let it be.
That guy sounds clingy and desperate. I dont think thats victim related.
Before I met my husband, I dated an LIE for a year and a half. He was critical and baited me all the time, and then I'd get upset. I don't know, maybe that's what he was going for. Anyway, we got along pretty well for a while but obviously things didn't work out forever.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Do you mind explaining how he baited you?
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
Well ok so it's been a LONG time - I'm old and I've been married a while now. But as I recall, he would comment on every single thing, and I don't like criticism, and it felt to me like he did it on purpose, to get me to respond to his criticism - like he was upsetting me on purpose. But that could be just my perception, I don't know.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
Poor Delta NF's, they always get abused by evil people.
Hydrangea, do you feel you acted rationally or ethically? I'm really curious here.
Ah okay. Thanks.
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
What is up with you AGAIN? This is because of stuff she said in chat, not about specifically being Delta NF, and the guy didnt' sound evil.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
I blocked every single person on my contacts list but the ones that never speak to me so that I could have some much needed me time. He had told me the day before not to tell him of my goings on so I did not. I did as he asked, I don't understand how this comes down to a question of ethics.
He asked me how he was supposed to anticipate that telling me that would lead to me cutting all contact with no explanation, and I merely explained he should think before he requests. I was trying to please him, to do as he wished.
Did I act rationally? Yes.
I wasn't judging you. I just wanted to hear how you reasoned your actions if you had thought you were being ethical. There is no wrong answer ultimately, but I have hard time seeing that as ethical and am curious to understand how someone could reason that ethically and soundly because I'm sure it can be done.
That was just a general observation, they always dramatize such situations, gossip and jump in "support".
I agree that it's good that she broke the deal, however IMO she should have told him and explain him first. If he refused to understand, then yes, block him. I am personally offended by such behavior and I'm telling you that besides there is no reason to behave like this, it creates a negative potential: that person may get angry and abuse someone who he perceives "the same" or whatever. This is a dumb approach, the person should be confronted and try to discharge the emotional load first. I was myself target of such guy on a website who picked on me because he got offended by what I wrote in my profile. He saw my pictures and threatened me, however, I confronted him and asked what his problem was - it was apparently about his prefered musical style - I explained it was a misunderstanting, we talked a bit, by-bye and that was it.
Those kinds of revenge are stupid and no, it was merely technically reasonable what she has done, not in reality - in other words you do shit but feel good about yourself because that's not written anywhere. It is an offense to silence someone when he's looking for answers - again, not when the situation was clarified but he refuses to understand. You may say "but it's his problem, I don't want to answer him", though in that case I would ask you: what if you work for a company and then suddenly you're fired without any reason? In the end it's only your interest, they don't give a shit about what you want. The fact that there are laws regulating employment and there are no laws regulating IM conversations does not make them different cases, the company can do you if the want to. I think anyone has a right to know why his interests need to be dismissed, it's common-sense and polite. These acts of suppression should be discouraged instead of encouraged, IMO, and I think you have the means to understand how arrogance creates negative emotions.
How is that unethical?
And here's the case when someone you explained your reasons still won't (want to) understand. In this case you have no option but not answer.
... he asked me not to tell him anything.
Perhaps I should have gone against his wishes, surely that must be more ethical.
Also, since you weren't the person to ask me about whether or not it was ethical, Ineffable, I didn't bother to read your post.
I thought Divided (I believe it was whom asked) would have been perfectly capable of speaking for himself.
Silly me, yet again.
You do not know anything about me, him, or the situation. When you have some knowledge feel free to comment. Until then I suggest you stop while you're ahead. I am not going to bother explaining myself to you, because as you said:And here's the case when someone you explained your reasons still won't (want to) understand. In this case you have no option but not answer.
What woman hurt you so badly Ineffable?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
4w5 sp/sx
