Isn't it interesting so much of republican rhetoric is centered around comparing people they don't like to either
- ****** - Nazis - Fascism
- Communists - Socialists - Marxists
- Terrorists - Muslims - Arabs
In fact I realize all three names have been thrown at Barrack Obama.... a Muslim, a Socialist, and sometimes compared to ******.
Everytime the Neo-Cons go to war with some power in an interventionalist manner it always begins with comparing them to Stalin/****** or calling them a Terrorist.
It all has to do with the History of this nation, defeating ******, the cold war, and now an era with terrorist attacks. Post WWII American society.
Before WWII the Republican Party and Conservatives had a totally different identity.
Meh its not so much that I support Barrack Obama, however I find the name calling to seem a little childish and intellectually devoid. Not to mention upon closer inspection its connection to the Neo-Con agenda, of interventionalism and policing the world in international manners.
The nature of the idea of labeling people terrorists, commies, and immediately attacking any dictator due to comparison with ****** and the association of America in WWII seems a little paranoid and arrogant.
I'm very skeptical that republicans can bring about a safer world, as it seems a little too over-bearing and paranoid. They are a little bit like hyper-reactive security guards, I'd expect the guardians of a nation in an ideal sense to seem more like jedi knights; patient, wise, diplomatic, masterful, etc.... meh but that's reality. Of course everyone knows liberals are just pussys so all we got to choose from is paranoid hillbillies and smart car/vespa owning / vegan liberals.