Out of a sense of propriety, I won't mention the individual whom referenced this site to me lest through the clarion call of guilt by association I somehow embarrass them, and so without the legitimacy of a proper introduction to offer you, I can only extend my personal assurance that I am not a troll and none of this is done lightly or for entertainment. Nor do I intend to detain you long.
The situation stands that I know an individual here to be rather taken with this sort of personality pidgeon holing. While tone is reduced to naught over text, I think it is quite obvious my stance is somewhat contrariwise to theirs. Point of fact, I think it is all rubbish. One can no more objectify the subjective than generalise the specific and this rather trite observation explains concisely why generalities invariably lend themselves to logical fallacies, and also why petty little tricks such as those employed to gauge an individuals social niche are both arbitrary and inaccurate in the end result.
If we have an understanding, then I would be appreciative if you would answer a simple question for me to settle a private dispute: Precisely how much faith do any of you actually have in your 'socionic' evaluations?