Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 70

Thread: Aspectonics: Statics

  1. #1
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Aspectonics: Statics



    1.)
    2.) due to / due to
    3.) due to / due to


    is the nature of the physicality.

    Due to there exists inherent boundaries of structure.
    Due to there exists inherent attraction of convergence.

    Due to structure & convergence there exists distances between alternate states of virtuality.


    The two circles are seperated by (physical distance), even though they are attracted to each other. Because the attraction exists, there is an illusion of closeness. But the wall still exists. represents the distance it takes to close in on another reality or state of being..



    It could be much better.
    Last edited by EyeSeeCold; 03-26-2011 at 02:32 AM.

  2. #2
    Banned Jinxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    973
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


  3. #3
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    wow
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  4. #4
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    the hell is that green thing

  5. #5
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    the hell is that green thing
    Virtual existence, what can be due to what is.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  6. #6
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    um... ok

  7. #7
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Progression starts like this, from :

    Internal Abstract Statics of Objects
    External Abstract Statics of Fields

    External Involved Statics of Objects

    Internal Involved Statics of Fields
    Internal Abstract Statics of Objects

    = + = = + =


    Smilingeyes did it already with the clock figures, this is a physical representation.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  8. #8
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There is not a single progression for the functions.

  9. #9
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    There is not a single progression for the functions.
    What do you mean?

    / Alpha / Beta / Gamma / Delta /

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ouKJgoaTCY
    Wasn't long enough. :/

    Quote Originally Posted by Jinxi View Post
    http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-HaY22LNN-44/TVnBHJ7lcKI/AAAAAAAAABY/YjolqhJokxc/s320/1262505173693.jpg
    That's . They're all close to each other in distance, but far away in thought.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  10. #10
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That progression is arbitrary. I dont know how that caught on & why that's the 1 quadra progression everyone uses. There are plenty more of them. Someone needs to write the rest. Quadras can progress in any way depending on what you value.
    Tell me, what does it mean to be at the leftmost of the quadra progression? You are at the beginning of what? This is a cycle of what?

  11. #11
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    That progression is arbitrary. I dont know how that caught on & why that's the 1 quadra progression everyone uses. There are plenty more of them. Someone needs to write the rest. Quadras can progress in any way depending on what you value.
    It's not arbitrary. It's logical progression based on relatedness.

    Sure they're probably many more you can come up with, but the one that exists is natural.


    Anyway I'm looking for some Ego to rip it to pieces and find something useful.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  12. #12
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Well no shit it's based on relatedness. They all are.
    You didnt answer my question. Natural? What is natural about it? Why is that the "logical one"?
    What is it progressing from, and toward?
    Let me guess.. from the beginning, toward the end

  13. #13
    Reflection mirrorsoul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    With my parents. :(
    Posts
    269
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What about the role of and ?

    I notice that they're not part of the model.

  14. #14
    the flying pig Capitalist Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    5,939
    Mentioned
    122 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default


  15. #15
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mirrorsoul View Post
    What about the role of and ?

    I notice that they're not part of the model.
    These are the Static aspects only. There are no Dynamic elements represented.

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    Well no shit it's based on relatedness. They all are.
    You didnt answer my question. Natural? What is natural about it? Why is that the "logical one"?
    What is it progressing from, and toward?
    Let me guess.. from the beginning, toward the end
    What are you looking for? This is the most natural progression because it is the most explicit & static(i.e. classifiable) way the elements / quadras progress in terms of relatedness.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  16. #16
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    explicit and static? Classifiable? What does that even mean?

    You're just making this shit up because you dont konw why you use that one. You just sort of read it somewhere, internalized it and now you use it every time.

    What I want you to tell me is what does this progression represent? What does it mean to be on the leftmost side of it? How about the right side?

  17. #17
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    explicit and static? Classifiable? What does that even mean?

    You're just making this shit up because you dont konw why you use that one. You just sort of read it somewhere, internalized it and now you use it every time.
    lol

    I just said why.

    Explicit = Observable(Well-defined). Static = Unique properties.
    Classifiable = Observable unique properties.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  18. #18
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah but you just made that shit up. How is it that one has the observable unique properties over the others?

  19. #19
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,983
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    there's only one way this thread can be saved.


  20. #20
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Because "attraction" exists there's an illusion of closeness to ???

    Yes, I would say that's correct...but to even get to attraction, there's that period of contemplation of what value the object has to me, the subject.

  21. #21
    Banned Jinxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    973
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labcoat View Post
    there's only one way this thread can be saved.

    Fake tits aren't nice.

  22. #22
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Actually I think crazedrat is correct there are several progression towards functions...

    Take Se as a starting point, you have a number of possible transitions

    Se->Si
    Se->Ne
    Se->Ni
    Se->Te
    Se->Ti
    Se->Fe
    Se->Fi

    I think certain transitions between these functions are sensible and other are not, like selection rules of the state of an atom in quantum mechanics

    the transitions between the various states have a particular psychological significance, the same way a transition of states in quantum mechanics has an associated "energy" gap.

    Se->Si
    Se->Ne

    Se->Te
    Se->Fe

    are allowable transitions

    Se-/->Ni
    Se-/->Ti
    Se-/->Fi

    are unallowed transitions

    Se to Si, is a subjective internalization of sensation
    Se to Ne, is an intuitive induction of the senses
    Se to Te, is a logical observations from an experience with an object
    Se to Fe, is a ethical observation from an experience with an object

    any function can link to others through a series of progressions

  23. #23
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^ Ah I see. There's too much activity right now to take it in though.

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    Yeah but you just made that shit up. How is it that one has the observable unique properties over the others?
    No such thing as "over the others" They are either classifiable or they're not. If there were any other well-defined unique properties of the elements, they'd be included.

    Do you classify red fingerpaint as part of the human skin organ?



    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Because "attraction" exists there's an illusion of closeness to ???

    Yes, I would say that's correct...but to even get to attraction, there's that period of contemplation of what value the object has to me, the subject.
    Right, you need to be involved, (Involved Statics) before you can get to the attraction (Abstract Statics) .
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  24. #24
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,451
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I've been looking at the OP for the past half hour in a desperate search for meaning. So far I've yet to find it.

    Seriously, it feels like you're making up definitions as you go along. The more I try to read and understand what you're writing the more confused I get and the more my head hurts. Nothing is defined up front, it's like I have to parse what you're trying to say for you, and I don't think I have the ability or the will to do it. What is the 'attraction,' the 'convergence,' the 'distance,' the 'closeness' that I'm supposed to even begin to assume you're talking about?

  25. #25
    The Troll Slayer Hitta's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    In your mom's uterus
    Posts
    4,009
    Mentioned
    154 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is like taking a shit, then looking at the lines of my shit and reading them like they are tea leaf lines.
    Model X Will Save Us!

    *randomwarelinkremoved

    jessica129:scrotums r hot

    :" hitting cap makes me envision cervix smashing"

  26. #26
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All the potential function progressions are equally classifiable. You have made no case, at all, to show that the one you've chosen (arbitrarily, because you saw it written down somewhere) is any more classifiable than the others. All you have done is stated it is, repeatedly.
    Your drawing sucks, too.

    What you dont get is that duality is at the heart of socionics, and the functions. Any progression you make will necessarily have an opposite and equally valid progression.

  27. #27
    the flying pig Capitalist Pig's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    5,939
    Mentioned
    122 Post(s)
    Tagged
    7 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jinxi View Post
    Fake tits aren't nice.

  28. #28
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post
    I've been looking at the OP for the past half hour in a desperate search for meaning. So far I've yet to find it.

    Seriously, it feels like you're making up definitions as you go along. The more I try to read and understand what you're writing the more confused I get and the more my head hurts. Nothing is defined up front, it's like I have to parse what you're trying to say for you, and I don't think I have the ability or the will to do it. What is the 'attraction,' the 'convergence,' the 'distance,' the 'closeness' that I'm supposed to even begin to assume you're talking about?
    Those terms mean what they imply. It's just not ordered or explained in the most logical way.

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    All the potential function progressions are equally classifiable. You have made no case, at all, to show that the one you've chosen (arbitrarily, because you saw it written down somewhere) is any more classifiable than the others. All you have done is stated it is, repeatedly.
    The usual Quadra progression has the least subjectivity, at least for the moment.

    and are related, true, but the difference is more subjective than progressing towards , which also happens to be a Delta pairing. "It makes sense".




    Your drawing sucks, too.
    Irrelevant.

    What you dont get is that duality is at the heart of socionics, and the functions. Any progression you make will necessarily have an opposite and equally valid progression.
    I do get it.

    It's not about validity. I understand there are other orders. The usual way explains more than any other progression.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  29. #29
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post

    Right, you need to be involved, (Involved Statics) before you can get to the attraction (Abstract Statics) .
    How does that work? Please explain the process by which I need to involve Se prior to FiNe?


    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    This is your response? Dont make me laugh

    You only expect a valid result...and you're terribly impatient and don't give him nearly enough support or credit for trying to understand the real workings of this process....Chill out.

  30. #30
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    This is your response? Its pathetic..
    No it's not. You're just volitionally dismissing it. You have the ability to reason - use it.

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    How does that work? Please explain the process by which I need to involve Se prior to FiNe?
    It's too abstract to be of any benefit, psychology / neuroscience already explains the process.

    You can't be attracted to something if you have nothing to be attracted to right? provides the form which you idealize.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  31. #31
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    No it's not. You're just volitionally dismissing it. You have the ability to reason - use it.



    It's too abstract to be of any benefit, psychology / neuroscience already explains the process.

    You can't be attracted to something if you have nothing to be attracted to right? provides the form which you idealize.
    I can abstract a form (usually through fantasy); my own subjective form or model...would that be an Se?

  32. #32
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    I can abstract a form (usually through fantasy); my own subjective form or model...would that be an Se?
    And where did you get the initial forms to imagine a new one?
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  33. #33
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    No it's not. You're just volitionally dismissing it. You have the ability to reason - use it.
    No, it's you whose being volitional. Promoting one quadra progression above all the other possibilities through the force of suggestion and a stunted "explanation" which you pulled out of your ass.

    You tell me it's "more objective" (even though every progression has the same functions in it). Even if this were true (which it isn't), this somehow makes it better? Subjectivity & objectivity are equally balanced within socionics, so why value one over the other? Hell, all I'm arguing is that the others EXIST. And since they exist, they must be ACKNOWLEDGED.
    Nevermind that we have no reason to think 1 function progression exists "more" than the others.
    By the way, you're using those terms objectivity / subjectivity wrongly again. But nevermind that. Everything you've said in this thread has been fucking slop.

    All a person has to do is look at your kindergarden scrawl drawing and see that you're a poseur.
    Stop spreading your masturbatory mental impulses around like they're truth.

  34. #34
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    And where did you get the initial forms to imagine a new one?
    From reality...oh I see now...I have to have seen it to abstract it...nice.

    I do love interacting with you

    I wish my dual was as interested in Socionics so that he could make such interesting explanations of the processes involved in this mechanics so that through discussions I would understand it better.

  35. #35
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ^

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    No, it's you whose being volitional. Promoting one quadra progression above all the other possibilities through the force of suggestion and a stunted "explanation" which you pulled out of your ass.
    Promoting? I wasn't promoting anything, you asked why it's it's the one being used, and I tried to explain.

    In my model I was using :
    - > / - > ...
    Form - > Laws of the form - > Abilities of the form

    You tell me it's "more objective" (even though every progression has the same functions in it). Even if this were true (which it isn't), this somehow makes it better? Subjectivity & objectivity are equally balanced within socionics, so why value one over the other? Hell, all I'm arguing is that the others EXIST. And since they exist, they must be ACKNOWLEDGED. By the way, you're using those terms objectivity / subjectivity wrongly again. But nevermind that. Everything you've said in this thread has been fucking slop.
    How many observable properties do and have in common? How many observable unique properties do and have in common?

    It's more reasonable to link up the elements with the most relatedness.

    Stop spreading your masturbatory mental impulses around
    Can't Stop Won't Stop.

    like they're truth.
    Never implied that, you just saw it that way. Am I imposing? Do you feel imposed on?

    I wonder why...
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  36. #36
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I dont like people spreading faulty information.
    This all traces back to your dumbass notion that the extraverted functions are objective. Parts of objective reality, or something. The extraverted functions represent an affinity for the object, they are not objective. Learn the fucking difference. The subject is not discarded. Se is a psychological function.
    You cannot observe the extraverted functions any more than you can observe the introverted functions.
    If I show you a picture of two things crashing together, sure you could make a case for that being Se. But then I could show you a city grid, and all the cars moving throughout it, and I could make the same case for that being Ti.
    I could make the same case that your perception of two things crashing into eachother is as subjective as it is objective.
    Listen to me. Throw away all your original ideas, and start from scratch. Learn socionics from the ground up. Or better yet stop thinking about socionics completely. Thats the best thing you can do.

  37. #37
    Haikus Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    22,740
    Mentioned
    531 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    I dont like people spreading faulty information.
    This all traces back to your dumbass notion that the extraverted functions are objective. Parts of objective reality, or something. The extraverted functions represent an affinity for the object, they are not objective.
    That's correct. He's just misunderstanding..this is semantics, you both are saying the other thing, but understanding the same thing.

    @ESC

    Just like with Se I have to have the object experience first to lend abstraction to Fi/Ti through Ne...

  38. #38
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 641 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,629
    Mentioned
    635 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    dude you are so Ti lol

  39. #39
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,693
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by crazedratsghost View Post
    I dont like people spreading faulty information.
    This all traces back to your dumbass notion that the extraverted functions are objective. Parts of objective reality, or something. The extraverted functions represent an affinity for the object, they are not objective. Learn the fucking difference.
    I see, so you are still affected by our previous encounter? Have I dug myself, like a parasitic worm, inside the depths of your mind, infecting your every thought, eating away at your every nerve?




    What are you going to do about that?
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  40. #40
    crazedrat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    moon
    Posts
    4,885
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    That's correct. He's just misunderstanding..this is semantics, you both are saying the other thing, but understanding the same thing.

    @ESC

    Just like with Se I have to have the object experience first to lend abstraction to Fi/Ti through Ne...
    No, we're not saying the same thing. At all. And I dont think you understand what's going on most the time.
    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    I see, so you are still affected by our previous encounter? Have I dug myself, like a parasitic worm, inside the depths of your mind, infecting your every thought, eating away at your every nerve?


    What are you going to do about that?
    It's that assumption which is leading you into these dumbass ideas of yours. I'm trying to do you a favor and fix your understanding. You should be thanking me.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •