She's very extroverted, that's all I'll say.
Help me type this biatch
She's very extroverted, that's all I'll say.
Looks LSE to me.
SEE (looks a bit like Dolphin and April)
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If Jodie Foster were a party girl, this would be her. EJ is my only guess.
Ni-ENFj?
she looks a bit like an LSE friend from long long ago
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
SEE? Based on the second picture especially. Is that a characteristic look for her?
Yeah, starting to consider SEE. She is very physically active, rides horses, four-wheels, off-roads. She is very loud and impulsive and random too. Thinking about having her killed.
Well, I hope you're considering taking the body before it's passed on...(otherwise, you might be a necrophiliac)
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lmaoOriginally Posted by k0rpsey
She would probably be offended by the idea of it? I'm just guessing here....
Not offended but disgusted even though there's a great chance that he's just joking.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm turned on by it.
Does the fact it disgusts Maritsa decrease, increase, or not affect your level of arousal towards the idea?
using a correlation coefficient between -1.0 and 1.0 would also be handy but not required.
Man fuck statistics. Not relearning that shit.
enfj, enfp or estj. Can't really tell between those three.
LOL!
LOL...he just ignored an opportunity to take up Ti and analyze that.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Not Beta to me--the eyes don't look Beta.
So I guess I prefer the Gamma (SEE) guess but am not sure, Gamma versus Delta.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Regardless of her type, she looks kinda mean and too aggressive. I prefer laid back/passive people, but who is also socially confident.
sensor
I vote LSE.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Definitely LSE. Like 90%+ sure (based on just VI though, of course).
Look how much she resembles Milla Jovovich, also an LSE:
x
Discojoe, she's your dual.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I know a LIE-Ni woman that looks simiar. Picture:
perhaps less stern.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
"definitely" should never be used in the same post as "based on just VI".
If you directly tell her what to do, she gives an Fe explosion. She also is very stubborn about interruptions to her routine, refusing to call back messages on the answering machine because it would take a long time and interfere too much with her preferred work activities. Her dad is the boss, so she gets away with it. Lol, her mom is actually scared of telling her what to do.
Se/Ni valuing extrovert. Don't see much evidence for delta or alpha.
sociotype.com
LII
She's beautiful. Girl in OP is not.I know a LIE-Ni woman that looks simiar. Picture:
perhaps less stern.
Your girl looks SLE
she bears resemblance to bar rafaeli in the last two pics.
she comes off as pretty arivistic and reminds me of this girl who i think is LIE.
many pics.i could make a thread of my own
Last edited by Kalinoche buenanoche; 04-10-2011 at 08:41 PM.
I just spent several hours at the office with her, and she's SEE. Reminds me of a mix between dolphin and khamelion.
She does cutesy SEE shit and is strangely subdued around me like most SEEs. I was telling her about how software becomes more and more demanding but hardware doesn't self-adapt (I was fixing the office computers and explaining to her that they need hardware upgrades, not tweaking), and she goes "Why not?" in a deliberately cute voice. Pretty sexy. Too bad she's too hot to ever notice her nerd dual... unless I hook her up with cpig, in which case he would owe me a life debt.
And no, this is not linked to my supervisor sexor thread, which is about a different SEE I used to work with.
Why do so many people think that aggressive, intense looking people are Beta or Se valuers when in fact, according to socionics.org - people with the most aggressive faces are in fact, Deltas. (ENTj looks more smug and like they enjoy the smell of their own farts more then anything aggressive, in fact all Gammas look sorta inbetween "I 50% care about your ****** feelings. but never 100%) It amuses me.
http://translate.google.com/translat...%26prmd%3Divns
Win.
Good logic, but technically "definitely" shouldn't be used in conjunction with any socionics typing. I believe using it while clarifying my method of VI is acceptable, and of course it's understood that VI is by no means a definitive typing method.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
