Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: VI

  1. #1
    voiliov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default VI

    edited


    See Post 6. Please.
    Last edited by voiliov; 03-12-2011 at 02:50 AM.

  2. #2
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    istp
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  3. #3
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Images aren't clear enough. Give us some better photos of your face in greater detail, preferably candid shots.

  4. #4
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,313
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ISTps have blurry faces.

  5. #5
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,935
    Mentioned
    699 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    he's lazy, too energy conserving, to have posted more photos
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  6. #6
    voiliov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    16
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Actually here's the thing, is that I don't really believe in VI. And I don't like these pictures being posted either. So here's what I'm going to do, how about if people here will answer some burning questions for me. Please.

    1. What do you, as in YOU not as in "one" or "a socionist", what do YOU look at when VIing someone?

    2. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type right?

    3. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type wrong?

  7. #7
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,428
    Mentioned
    34 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    VI works sometimes, because people of the same type have similar features in their face.

    So you can recognize a type sometimes in a second by just looking at his/her face.

    But VI only works if you've typed about let's say 30 people accurately, then the similarities start to appear.

    Some wellknown typical features:
    ESFP : hook nose
    ISTP: smooth face, larger cheeckbones
    ENFJ-Fe: young looking face (especially females)
    ESTJ-Te: sharp square face

    But the best method is as I said, simply comparison. But it does not work always because of too many subtypes that you cannot all have met.

  8. #8
    c esi-se 6w7 spsx ashlesha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    the center of the universe
    Posts
    15,833
    Mentioned
    912 Post(s)
    Tagged
    4 Thread(s)

    Default

    i imagine it could be more intertype related. do they say why?

  9. #9
    Creepy-Snaps

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by voiliov View Post
    Actually here's the thing, is that I don't really believe in VI. And I don't like these pictures being posted either. So here's what I'm going to do, how about if people here will answer some burning questions for me. Please.

    1. What do you, as in YOU not as in "one" or "a socionist", what do YOU look at when VIing someone?

    2. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type right?

    3. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type wrong?
    I'm bad at VI, and was very skeptical about its merits when I first began too. However, I do realize other people are surprisingly good at it, and it seems a useful tool in typing someone, albeit not a be-all definite thing.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •