edited
See Post 6. Please.
edited
See Post 6. Please.
Last edited by voiliov; 03-12-2011 at 02:50 AM.
istp
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Images aren't clear enough. Give us some better photos of your face in greater detail, preferably candid shots.
ISTps have blurry faces.
he's lazy, too energy conserving, to have posted more photos
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Actually here's the thing, is that I don't really believe in VI. And I don't like these pictures being posted either. So here's what I'm going to do, how about if people here will answer some burning questions for me. Please.
1. What do you, as in YOU not as in "one" or "a socionist", what do YOU look at when VIing someone?
2. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type right?
3. How often do you VI someone and later find out that you got their type wrong?
VI works sometimes, because people of the same type have similar features in their face.
So you can recognize a type sometimes in a second by just looking at his/her face.
But VI only works if you've typed about let's say 30 people accurately, then the similarities start to appear.
Some wellknown typical features:
ESFP : hook nose
ISTP: smooth face, larger cheeckbones
ENFJ-Fe: young looking face (especially females)
ESTJ-Te: sharp square face
But the best method is as I said, simply comparison. But it does not work always because of too many subtypes that you cannot all have met.