View Poll Results: Which Jungian type or types are you?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • Extraverted Thinking

    1 7.69%
  • Extraverted Feeling

    0 0%
  • Extraverted Sensation

    0 0%
  • Extraverted Intuitive

    0 0%
  • Introverted Thinking

    5 38.46%
  • Introverted Feeling

    6 46.15%
  • Introverted Sensation

    1 7.69%
  • Introverted Intuitive

    2 15.38%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Which Jung type are you?

  1. #1
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Smile Which Jung type are you?

    Which Jungian type or types do you relate the most to? http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Jung/types.htm

  2. #2
    lump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    TIM
    Fi/Te 6 sp/sx
    Posts
    12,597
    Mentioned
    631 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    either Fi or Si, i think

  3. #3
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,449
    Mentioned
    203 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Probably Fi. The Ne type description sounds painfully sporadic and distracted, which I don't think I am.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  4. #4
    Let's fly now Gilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    TIM
    3w4 sx/so
    Posts
    24,757
    Mentioned
    91 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Extroverted Feeling

    fucking asshole
    But, for a certainty, back then,
    We loved so many, yet hated so much,
    We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...

    Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
    Whilst our laughter echoed,
    Under cerulean skies...

  5. #5
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    6,724
    Mentioned
    235 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by polikujm View Post
    Which Jungian type or types do you relate the most to? http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Jung/types.htm
    That's gotta be one of the worst descriptions I've ever seen.
    Who wants to read a monotone rant?

    ESTj
    1w2 sp/so 1-2-6
    Brilliand's Younger Sister
    Squishy's Older Sister

    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  6. #6
    I'm a Ti-Te! Skeptic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    US
    TIM
    ILI
    Posts
    522
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    That was a very good read, I really must get into Jung more... though I am somewhat disturbed by the introverted intuitive description, which states we receive pictures or sensations from seemingly nowhere, or the 'cosmos' as it were. While this description is agreeable to an extent, I greatly conflict with it when it goes further to state that we are nearly like dumb animals enslaved to the meandering nonsense in our heads! Also, in the extraverted thinking section it states that if an irrational function is dominant, the thinking function is then subordinate to that dominant - which would make sense, but he relates this to the use of fallacious thinking and irrational explanations, something I am unwilling to ascribe to my persona or those that mimic my method of thinking.

    It is as though he figures that any functional combination with the introverted intuitive type will result in a loss of any and all rational faculties (destined to lead a life of a 'prophet' or deranged lunatic...)! This is surely a very short selection of his work, however, and I owe it to him to educate myself further.
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
    |
    To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

  7. #7
    Haikus
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    8,337
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    mostly Introverted Feeling (but also Si and a downplayed Ne, a paralleled and temporary sense of Ti, and Te makes a fitting shadow function.)

  8. #8
    Jarno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Netherlands
    TIM
    ILI-Te
    Posts
    5,375
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Skeptic View Post
    It is as though he figures that any functional combination with the introverted intuitive type will result in a loss of any and all rational faculties (destined to lead a life of a 'prophet' or deranged lunatic...)!
    I am a deranged lunatic. So the description is right.

    btw If I were you I would buy his book, Psychological Types. It's still selling well today.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •