...
...
Last edited by Hays; 05-30-2011 at 05:08 AM.
based on your avatar: xNFx
But that's just guessing, I know.
Back when you and your husband started that thread to find out his type (and also yours), I got more of a Delta NF impression from his descriptions of you. Possibly Gamma SF. Serious>Merry; Fi-valuing>Fe-valuing.
But, what do you think?
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
I've seen nothing to contradict my initial assessment of EII. But I'm by no means certain of that -- maybe 40% sure.
Quaero Veritas.
God knows your type. I WIN!
Hayley, I am unsure if your love of research/analysis means either you're 1) some NT rational or 2) Te-valuing. You seem to reference a lot of things, even the enneagram thing you pasted, and use a lot of examples in trying to identify exact phenomena. Using lots of examples for what stuff reminds you of. This is very much Te-valuing.
Going by that, as a Te-valuer, you'd be in either the Gamma or Delta quadra. ILI is certainly a possibility, and so is Delta NF, as others have mentioned.
Very sorry to hear of your fight with your daughter. If it's the daughter I suspect , she very well may be Beta, and the ill-feeling could have been from quadra conflict, among other things. I wouldn't necessarily identify that as being weak emotionally as it pertains to weak Fe.
In fact, you think Fe POLR makes sense? Please consider looking at Se POLR as well:
Originally Posted by WikisocionConsidering your love of research, and analytical mind, and the few minutes here and there I got to speak with you , I have also considered INTj for you, possibly Ti-valuing. If you feel Se POLR fits better than Fe POLR, it could point to Delta NF again, particularly INFj, or possibly INTj.Originally Posted by Wikisocion
Hope my Ti-analysis helps you in search of your type.
I think you came on to the forum with a prejudice and a bias for Se. I hope you've reconsidered some of the stereotypes that perpetuated this thinking and now I hope you don't sticking to these beliefs in a hard and fast manner. I hope you have learned to let go of your preconceived notions.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
hmm now you mention it. Yes.
Also, Niffweed had this same kind of behaviour against male ILI's.
Niffweed is also narcisistic or something like that, just like Maritsa has some traits of. But I'm not sure, something is not right about narcisistic. But what is interesting is that they follow the same peculiar pattern.
One day I'll figure it all out hehe.
Some sort of Gamma introvert would be my unreliable and fickle guess. Perhaps more on the ILI side since Marie typed you as a IEI, meaning she doesn't relate to you.
You sound more ILI than anything else to me at this point.
Now I've read the other thread and you sound much less ILI when your husband describes you.
Hey! Just watched these both.
You remind me greatly of Sarah... overall demeanor, cute little sigh when you're having trouble saying what you want. And I kinda wanted to hear Matt more! But thought it was a bit funny, when you're pouring your heart out about your views of marriage and happiness, and he was just petting the cat!
Not sure if you're Ti-valuing, you seem to like comparing/contrasting a lot, but you include a fair amount of examples. Not sure for Ti versus Te valuing.
I would agree, you seem to definitely be INXx. Weak Se, you don't pay attention to your surroundings. The example from the zoo, where your husband is trying to get you involved, when you're so excited, as well as paying attention to sensing things, like health, or concentrating on anything physical.
You don't seem very interested in people. You even admit, you don't like bothering with people's problems... but even, you mentioned you liked walking by yourself as a child, painting, lots of activities you did alone. And that you don't like watching television, maybe you're uninterested in any of the storylines, if it's people-related, etc.
Not sure if Se is valued or unvalued, although I said it was weak. You don't like pushing your values on others, or using any kind of force. Even when Sarah said you have strong standards... I know INTjs have strong standards of behavior...
But then INTp descriptions fit you as well. I could even see ENTp *possibly*, just getting excited about new ideas and all. Or even INFp could fit possibly... it's tough to pick a quadra or function-values for ya.
Just some insights, hopefully some of it can be helpful. I think in general, you're having a tough time picking a type/quadra, because you're too focused on the big picture and seeing possibilities, that you're missing Sensing details and facts, that can clearly discriminate what you're strong at or weak at.
I'd say possibly weak Se, devalued Fe... again pointing to Gamma or Delta, like I suggested before, but not by a large margin. I'd have to guess Gamma>Delta>Alpha=Beta at this point, but not very much separating any of them.
I never typed Haley, rather just through IEI out there as a suggestion, although for some reason I find Beta to be a weird quadra for her.
The only strong impression that I get from her is that she is either Ni dominant or Ne creative and is likely a Harmonizing subtype (which could also factor into her being more difficult to type). EII is totally possible for her IMO
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-23-2011 at 06:40 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
just had a nose at the thread and thought id share a few things ive been thinking.
Been looking into right vs. left brained research, and found out that there is only around 90% of ppl using the right side of the brain. This side specialises in feelings, seeing the bigger picture and creative things. Im mentioning this only because in my opinion hayley is right brained. Which makes typing her more difficult as much of the research would be written on left brained ppl. This is why i think for so many years ive struggled typing, myself and hayley (my mum), as we can both be quite objective and thinking-like, yet at the same time we both have very strong feelings and emotions and use these well. This whole thing started going through my mind when i was thinking about how the world really is designed for left brainers. so much of the world seems back to front-car driving, repetitive stuff, some computer game consoles and keyboards. it also comes into mental spatial awareness and uncoordination.
Anyways, just a thought. Found the subject really interesting and thought it was related to hayley's type very well and maybe to others here on the forum who have found finding their type difficult.
This Frog runs on Sugar!
Forgot to mention that in some research by Phaedrus somewhere on this forum, he showed how brain dominance can be linked to functions:
Si, Te, Ni, and Fi are left brain, and that Fe, Se, Ne, and Ti are right brain
This Frog runs on Sugar!