What do you think?
What do you think?
Though not exhaustive, it's pretty good.
I'm lost. What does that really have to do with intuition? I suppose the first one works for , but is introverted, so maybe you're thinking of for the second one. The first one might behold intuition because of its detachment from reality, the right opposite of sensing: a form of abstraction based on the object.
On the other hand, Introverted intuition if externally would work in a way that brings non-existent "context" or "fields" upon existent objects, by first orienting oneself to the subjective abstract. ie. "how does my gape (service) of pine detain "Archimedes claw or even Archimedes himself? etc, etc" Not to serve the object (or possible content, and in s case merely "abstraction of content"), but the subjective state (via routes of possibility (N.) is most always going to be rather more objective than however, so this diagram doesn't really fit, does it. It's not really that complicated, but its definitely not anything closely related to "this is money, and this is how you'd benefit with money." It's like a bad stereotype really, or tasteless old joke.
* Introverted intuition is responsible for an estimation of time, timeliness of actions, understanding of a course of processes in time, forecasting.
Source: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...rted_Intuitionis generally associated with the ability to recognize the unfolding of processes over time (how one event leads to another), have visions of the past and future, develop mental imagery, and see intangible hints of relationships between processes or objects.
Source: http://www.socionics.us/theory/information.shtmlintangible connections between processes separated in time and space: sense of when things might happen, patterns of events, abstract representations of processes
Source: http://www.typelab.ru/en/articles/lytovs-intro3.htmlThis function, instead of lots of possibilities, considers people and the world as if flowing in a big and insuperable stream of time.
Source: http://en.socionics.ru/index.php?opt...=252&Itemid=41Time, event, past/future, evolution, sometime, forecast, history, generations’ relationships, plan, punctuality, development, process, strategy
Those sources are actually somewhat true (about stream of time, development, etc - or more or less 'developed stream of time')
But they don't really do Socionics any justice. I = potential, structural, T = temporal, ulterior. is rarely a distinct influence of "sense of when things might happen, patterns of events, forecasting, etc," however this is very close to Jungian/MBTI theory (Myers reclarifying Jung...) Augusta on the other hand had witnessed field dynamics as both internal and external, via what is called introverted perception, which is why those Jungian facets are not a valid revolution of perception in intertype relations, but perception the state is (field dynamics, subjective process, subjective perception, indefinite, non-evidentual, Pe-dousing/polar etc). What also works here somewhat with is "develops mental imagery, intangible hints of relationships between processes or objects," and you will find an also good explanation of T via Filatova.
Seems to me that this corresponds to lateral thinking vs. linear thinking.
There is a good amount of related material in the forum and other sites about MBTI Ti as "leverage" and "measure sourcing" in the INTP and ISTP which directly correlate to creative , via personalities like the Craftsman and the Designer/Architect. Most INTPs I've spoken with have given me a sense that these backgrounds of Ti are not a primary outlook in life, with little identification with a dominant sense of logic or judgment, but they're rather the epitome of . Funny is that you will often read some INTP profiles emphasizing an unreal perfection of logic to direct a functional theory, where as many INTP profiles will sound more imaginative, artistic and creative. As well does the former not much apply in the cases I've questioned, though you still have the official Architect type in reality, alike as well to what Keirsey described. Some type facets and correlations stick better than others. What I have experienced with INTJs is more planning, analysis, and a high sense of logic via temperance of the irrational. Think of "creative" not in a mode of planning, but on the brink of a creative achievement, and "accepting" in a mode of thorough analysis, ie. INTp: "I build this chart so that the vision I devise may come alive." INTj: "I study this chart so I may understand all the engineering and paths of this system and structure."
"And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl
It's pretty cool
EII - INTj - Dostoyevsky -
No, it's not a typo!
Um... yeah. Well done. That's how I think about it.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
Do you guys realize that that definition you have of and is totally MBTI? Ne is used by perceiving types which is why you have it defined as "possibilities" and going every which way, and Ni is used by judging types, which is why its in a decisive sequence. MBTI functions don't explain anything, with the Ns they just say Ne is making multiple associations and not sticking with one, where as Ni is making a typical association. That's incredibly oversimplified, all it's doing is defining irrational/rational. Try reading more real Socionics material, there's more to it.
Yes, Timeless. Ne sees parallel universes, Ni sees the flow of events.
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
True maritsa. Time for people to reference the material about rational vs irrational mindsets too, to see if there's any relation from this 'Ni' and rational, and this "Ne' and irrational, before they go continuing to post repetitive old mistakes (and also learn the definition of objects/fields)
Ne ego block, role function, activator, and demonstrator can all use Ne either very well (Ego block), periodically (Ne activators), show but not is (Ne role) and demonstrate as an illusion (Ne demonstrators)
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 2w1sw(1w9) helps others to live up to their own standards of what a good person is and is very behind the scenes in the process.
Tritype 1-2-6 stacking sp/sx
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions: