ESTx (j or P) can't tell (need a side pic). Could also be ISTj. But definitely ESTp.
ESTx (j or P) can't tell (need a side pic). Could also be ISTj. But definitely ESTp.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-10-2011 at 02:31 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Fucking Teeth and that smile remind me of a horse.... CHOMP CHOMP CHOMP NOM NOM NOM.....
first one she's like "lol you took my picture, and I'm a little embarassed about it but also loling"
the dude's like "errr umm come back here, don't look into the camera"
second one she's like "HEYYYYYY GEUSS WHO GUYZ!, herp de derp", the other girl is kinda unsure and magnetized by her, must turn head inward, getting sucked in...
third one she's kinda like "'forever alone' but still loling" and looking a little pent up.
VI
I'd probably say Feeler > Thinker
I'd probably say Rational > Irrational
She seems emotive and controlled
There is also a hint of Fi like in the third picture she seems upset/exhausted about something but has an innocent little smile on, it makes me think that there is a much deeper current running through her than her outward expressions. She seems engaging to the people around her in a sort of forced/controlled fun/warm way. That's why I say Fi, relational and depth of feeling.
Also the easy to talk to friendly, but quiet. Makes me think maybe an introverted mentality and further think Fi, specifically something stands out in my mind that is a connection to Jung's original writings and what Fi is.
I'd say ESI
The guy in the top picture is an LSE I'd guess
The girl in second photo, something Si-ish, Delta or Alpha, I want to say SEI
The last photo, see doesn't seem as dominant, the other person leans in more, seems happier/confident, she seems a little aloof or shy... maybe the they have a relationship where she is more of the giver in terms of positive feelings and she is the receiver? I don't know what type that would be?
Last edited by male; 02-09-2011 at 08:26 AM.
Yeah, ESI probably. Does she spend a lot of time on her appearance?
Is she laughing really loudly?
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
ESI
Girl: Ti-ESTp
Boyfriend first pic: ILI or IEI
Friend second pic: gamma SF
Friend third pic: ILE?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
this is mean but hilarious!Originally Posted by HaveLucidDreamz
I have no opinion on her type. only that there's something about her that annoys me.
IEI-Fe 4w3
I get Fe overload from these pics. Yuck.
yea I was in a bad mood =p
It's mean but true, just don't tell her that, she looks friendly but a little forced.
Huh, what are you talking about?
About 80% of the time, you and I agree with one another
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
1981slater tends to be rather accurate in his typings in terms of VI, except when he thought that I'm an Si-ESFj.
lol its sad but true.
Yes, very good. So the first girl is clearly not introverted or ethical, and the second girl is definitely two opposite types? Slater you must teach me your secrets.
Yes, haha. That was my reaction. If not ESI, then it's a certain type of facial features I tend to see.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
lol
I also guessed ESI. Consistently wide smile showing teeth indicates a likely Ethical type, but the range of emotional expression seems limited, indicating Fe-devaluing and probably Fe-Ignoring. Posture seems a bit stiff and awkward, indicating Rational and probably Static. Finally, hairstyle and makeup seem to fit more closely with the trends I've observed for Se-valuing types, rather than Si-valuing types (i.e., Se-valuing = "sexy", Si-valuing = "cute").
Quaero Veritas.
The si-ESFj is gone. I can see Fi ego.
Bolt? I missed you. In the economics discussion, lots of people disagree with me. Join the party!
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
And...is that good or bad?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
It was not me. My gf said that you typed the brown haired girl as two different types, that's what she found hilarious, in addition to the fact that you seem to have a fixation in typing any eyeglasses careerist-ish girl who looks like Vero as ILE. I'd add that if she's mistyped, all your subsequent such IVs are bogus.
-- Bolt
You are right, Bolt. I spent just a few seconds observing the pics: I got a gamma vibe and then the glasses made me think "anyone with glasses is NT", so I automatically wrote ILE. I didn't even realize it's the same person. I'm so careless!
Bolt, you remind me of some ILEs I know. They are the DCNH creative, whereas I am the dominant subtype. My "relationship" with them developed in the same way as ours. They used to get angry with me whenever I said anything contrary to their beliefs or not thorough enough. They are very disliked by everybody because they tend to use harsh language when discussing something, as Wikisocion says "the creative subtype is easily stirred"/"When the dominant and the creative interact, creative inspects dominant".
BTW, after I realized the stupid VI I wrote, I recalled this:
.png)
Last edited by 1981slater; 02-12-2011 at 09:53 AM.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Slater generally types people SEI or ESE just like Maritsa types them SLI or LSE.
And we are always sure that you are right there, along our side, observing our actions.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh really ?
Haha, I think you're giving me way too much credit thinking I follow his magnificence slater or you, Queen Mother Maritsa. I simply know that generally he does type people so and I know you do as well. I don't have to read all this crap you post to realise it.
I just typed a member ISTj...you can add that to your collection of crap about me (I'm sure you have plenty to swallow).
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You won't be telling me what to do and it's an act of regurgitation not swallowing reading you.
I wish there were some amount of reading you, as there is none to read other then putting people down for their effort. Here you are hanging around on a Socionics forum where people discuss types and personality and I am making an effort to learn as well as explore, but have to deal with you who constantly puts me down. You who doesn't participate in any productive way, here, on a Socionics forum.
I am here to type and even if I get it wrong, I would have made a hell of a lot more effort than you. Who does nothing on a socionics forum except to criticize people and their effort.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Judging by the PMs vigorously sent to me by non other than you and quite frankly bugging me that I am the type I am not, I will not comment it.
How does it feel when the boot is on the other foot ?Here you are hanging around on a Socionics forum where people discuss types and personality and I am making an effort to learn as well as explore, but have to deal with you who constantly puts me down.
First off, I don't know what is so productive in throwing multiple types on people giggling all the way and praying that at least one will stick. But yea, you can always delete what you wrote as you did on numerous occasions.You who doesn't participate in any productive way, here, on a Socionics forum.
Now off with you to tinychat, people are waiting for you to type them plus your productivity on a god damned forum speaks for itself - how the heck can you be productive on the Internet ?
You don't have a place to criticize me for throwing multiple types at people. If you got butt-hurt over me doing that to you then I assure you, you get butt-hurt very easily and hold resentments...Fe PoLR?
THIS IS A SOCIONICS FORUM DEAL WITH GETTING TYPED MANY TIMES.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
See what I mean ?
This is a socionics forum where serious people like you discuss socionics and I'm going to tell you what I am typing you. You're a clear-cut Beta to me and yes, I do resent you.
Pthu!
Yeah? Then why don't I use Fe?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Stupid question. Stupid answer - because you're living in captivity and made this thread what it is now.
Oh sorry, details PFFF
where do I use Fe?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I honestly have no idea what you just said, you're clearly too Fe-productive for me.
Anyway, it was nice talking to you and I am saying that so you know I might report you just the way you reported me. What goes around, comes around.
I was going to say that girl was ESFj, but that clearly isn't the point of this thread anymore :/
ESE
BTW that the girl next to her in the last pic looks ILE... reminds me of Vero and other female ILEs I know.
Hmm I must be a different subtype then, if what you say and DCNH are true things. I'm not disliked by many IRL, neither I use a harsh language, usually. Consider my opinions on sexuality, religion, politics, medicine, philosophy and so on.
---
May I ask why did you duplicate your answer into Parasite's profile? I prefer to have it deleted, unless there's a good reason I miss.
-- Bolt
The ESE suggestion is killing meunless she's just a really introverted ESE, with a repressed dominant function. The whole continent of Africa may just need to shit a brick
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
