I voted Fe subtype on the basis of how you looked in a couple of photos and your overall persona here, compared with interviews and photos of supposed IEI-Fes. Though I haven't seen a video of you, I get the impression you might be more smooth and composed than I find the Nis to be.
Just my take on it, with fairly limited information. The written descriptions have never given me much insight into subtype, tbh.
Last edited by golden; 02-07-2011 at 05:57 PM.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
I think you're a mix of both too.
IEI-Fe 4w3
Most likely a Ni subtype imo. Based on my own experience, people of the Ni subtype tend to give me the impression that they are silently intensed as compared to the Fe subtype. With regards to the other forum members, you reminded me of raisonpure to a certain extent (not sure if you remember her).
mixed
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Mature
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
i wouldn't be surprised if we were the same subtype!
Ni
Glam you are a blatant Fe sub, silly. You're not as aloof-seeming as starfall, more engaging, less hidden.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Ni because you are not funny.
I think the difference between the avatar of starfall and glamourama says enough.
Both point clearly towards a certain subtype.
Not that it's a good typing method, but it's just something I noticed.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
