A must-read for the newbies!!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
That's way to confusing and basically off. The connections/relations that Fi functions determine are related to properties (eg "this in common, that different"), much like Ti, not some disemboweled additional channels. Indeed the color allegory is relatively good to point out that there is not necessarily a matter or more/less, when creating relationships, but what type these are.
An important error is the false view that the nature of Static makes the Fi conclusions unchanging, or hardly changing. Not only that it's not true - it depends much on new information - but it's not related to Dynamic/Static. Even if someone does not understand what's this all about, it doesn't even make intuitive sense for Ne, or when you consider Fi Irrationals, for example. Fi may change rarer than Ti because it's subjective (feeling) and the evidence may be confined easily to expectations and revised views (eg overlooking the mistakes of a "good man"), on the other hand the same thing may make it more changeable - compare Fi Rationals to Fi Irrationals.
lol all his extended metaphors make his message so unnecessarily convoluted. I'm sure there are easier ways of explaining IEs than this.
I felt those descriptions vastly clarified things for me, tbh.
YOUR explanations confuse me further, Galen
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Originally Posted by WorkaholicsAnon
I felt those descriptions vastly clarified things for me, tbh.
YOUR explanations confuse me further, Galen
It's ok I still like you
I think we just approached learning socionics from different directions.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I don't know how much truth is in those mental images of IEs, but I really like those explanations. You can imagine it much better and also tend to remember those things much easier. If someone wants to know about a certain IE and knows nothing about them, these examples are perfect.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Its relatively good in the way it walks you through the concept of "static fields" using an analogy to make it a lot more grounded.
but the laser beam analogy is a little silly, and it lacks complexity.
One thing I noticed was do Fi types make ethical connections with only people? how about communities, organizations, and things. can they form there little laser bonds with these things, and if not, then why not?
I personally have looked at Fi as being more general than just a grid of relationship between people, I look at it as a grid of relationships (in the ethical sense) between everything.
I'd like to criticise it, but in the realm of socionics it's ok...except to me it's a bit too Ni... it 'forgets' that everyone morphs between the two, and for an analogy to describe such a thing, it's better an Ne thing, otherwise you're stuck with yes/no answers.
Yeah, we definitely do. That is a good point though, I have to learn to phrase what I want to say in a more accessible way; although, to really get at the heart of the subject you have to do describe it in these super conceptual ways.It's ok I still like you
I think we just approached learning socionics from different directions.
Anything written by Expat is a good read for the newbies.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I found the fog bit confusing, but I like the lasers part.
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
Oh yeah they definitely can!
and obviously these descriptions are oversimplified to illustrate the concept.
EXTRAPOLATE, PEOPLE!!!!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I guess it's a good sign you're Fi-valuing > Fe valuing.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Fi eye... GUNNA XPLODE!
Anatomy of an Fi eye.
Medical treatment for Fi PoLR. Extra fee for type change - get the "Be 100% Serious" packet.
Superman uses Fi.
Buy the new Fi shades.
Last edited by Park; 01-18-2011 at 02:44 AM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
lol parkster, that was greatI remember that laser-beam thing from way back when. lol
Obama approves of this thread.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I understood his descriptions of the other elements better.
Last edited by nil; 01-18-2011 at 06:06 AM.
Probably not.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...638#post801638
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
