Superego relations--various authors (machine trans)
ID Vaysband Working Paper on Socionics
Constantly haunted by the idea that your partner is doing something specifically to spite you. well, until you both care about each other. If the quarrel did, this concern disappears and the conflict becomes unexpectedly loud. " Partners' interests are completely different, communication is difficult, they can not rely on each other, conflicts often arise.
OB Slinko "The key to my heart - Socionics"
With regard to the superego come partners, block EGO one of which coincides with the power of another superego. What does this mean? Strong function block EGO your partner agree with your weak functions that make up the block superego. Your role in superego function is the leading, and he realized the pain of your function. Thus, as a partner would constantly demonstrates its superiority in relevant areas. Of course, this unpleasant situation is reciprocal: the same, but on other aspects, experiences and second-party relationship superego. We should not think that this relationship is unique to the negative connotation. Partners nourish each other involuntary respect: he is so strong in matters with which I have always problems. You may have to superego sympathy and even empathy, because you very well see his weaknesses. Exerting some effort to ensure that once again not to hurt a partner in a pair of the superego can successfully establish a good relationship.
RK Graying "Information psychoanalysis"
Title IV corresponds to its structure: the block of the ego of one partner interacts with the block of the superego of the second. In most cases, this interaction does not go easy on dating. Partners to feel a bit "cramped". As a result of this interaction often seems to be somewhat superficial. But sometimes it happens that people in the BPI have closely interact. Relations in such a case can become very deep, but still not simple. Determined the structure of this interaction blocks. "Adult" - "insecure teenager." It happens that quiet, confident of "adult" frighten or delight "teenager." Rarely, they can leave it untouched. In this case, a "teenager" almost invariably wake up in problems like inferiority complex in some of its many options. For example, he may look to partner more subdued and quiet, may, on the contrary, loudly trying to prove that he understands something in life. In all cases, however, have something in common. "Adult" understood the true state of affairs "teenager" and his psychological reactions. "Teenagers" is nothing but clear superiority of a partner, and it oppresses. Naturally, the further development of relations depends primarily on the first partner in tact.
Secondly, is associated with the development and protected block superego second participant interaction. Sadly, life is usually both of these conditions are far from ideal condition. Because this interaction is usually not a comfortable one. In order not to spoil relations of super-ego should never be too persistent in trying to reach out to partner, to re-direct his or much to gain. The more relaxed attitude to each other, the easier it is to communicate. Even with the outer surface is the IW can be very informative, because the superego, as a sponge, absorbing interest to his experience block ego. As for the behavior of the ego vehicle, then Socionics say so. Treat your partner weak functions as would like to see it applied to yours. Eid - SuperId. The situation here is similar to that just described. "Baby" suddenly begins to want to grow up strong, his behavior changes accordingly, and in this "teenager" is often laughable. The reaction is understandable. Another variant of interaction, when Eid feels so adult, that with a sense of enormous self-importance helps to "child" in life is less common. But even here sometimes prevents a natural for a "child" a desire to allow myself to worry about. From the viewpoint of "teenager" it is somewhat cumbersome. Unfortunately, some of the super-ego is aware of the problem only once married.
Lyme Stankevichyute "Intertype relationship"
In this case constantly haunted by the idea that your partner is specifically doing everything wrong, is not considered to be with your desires, deliberately annoys you. Sensor systems in this type of relationship always intuitive revenge for previous wrongs endured. Visceral sensory constantly criticized all the time and recall lists that are done them wrong.
AV Boukalov, G. Boiko, "Why Saddam Xuseyn wrong, or what is Socionics"
This relationship of mutual respect and support. Each sees the other qualities that would develop in themselves. Moreover, - he sees that the partner sells his ideal, ie those functions which are the source of doubt, and sometimes qualms. Often, when the partner talks on the strong features, it becomes unpleasant to listen to. But overall relations are good. For example, Don Quixote very impressed with Napoleon's ability to organize, carry along. And that involves the ability of Don Quixote to understand complex theoretical constructions. In these relations must be respected psychological distance, because in a relationship people can annoy each other. Therefore, in the family one of these partners, or both at once, quite seriously: it is very difficult all the time to adjust to each other.
VV Gulenko "Tests of reciprocity"
Communication initially interesting, but too monotonous, tedious. Because of this we have to do a lot of effort over themselves to make it an element of novelty and singularity. In this way, can at times reach a fairly large degree of reciprocity. However, over time begin to demand that partners with more attention than it usually pays to you and on this ground appear recriminations and complaints. Partners begin to treat one another as selfish. Constant squabbles - the inevitable companion of these relations on a short distance.
Binary attributes intertype relationships
Superego relations are characterized by the ability to sensitively capture the state and encourage partner communication in the far distance. Broad arena of communicative partners need for diplomatic maneuvering. At close range, and alone, when partners are deprived of an exciting change of impressions, livable greatly reduced.
Relationships superego constantly veers full of empty promises. Partners may, in person say one thing and stick actually the opposite. Their activity is highly dependent on the general state of the pair. Attempts to put yourself in a relationship, partners are violent resistance. This couple is very variable, requires a change in the free lessons.
Superego relations at close range are filled by frequent quarrels and reconciliation. In these partners are involved in the search of a stable position, which is very shaky and constantly escapes. Can not find the logic in the behavior of each other. Relationship is characterized by passion and at the same time irrational behavior toward the partner.
Relationships superego very pragmatic. Partners are connected to a pair of super-ego with quite tangible, materialistic interests. This couple is able to gain experience through trial and error. Partners will also monitor the status of each other and very painfully react if someone passes the other in the sense of obtaining benefits or privileges.
On restoring the balance periodically destroyed and relationships based superego. Any rapid changes seen in this pair probably a negative point of view than the positive. In the mismatch of the states, each accusing the other. In a pair of superego partners often consider each other egoists.
Evolutionary relationship of superego leads to a gradual, but sometimes stormy equalizing forces and emotional contributions of partners. Each of the participants to quickly respond to the imbalance. The amplitude of these oscillations gradually increases, reaching a climax, and then begins to decline, as the partners are learning more and more fully consider the interests of each other. Opposed positions increasingly smoothed.
VV Gulenko, AV Gars "Introduction to socionics"
Attitude of respect for each other. Superego means "superego." Partner is perceived as distant and somewhat mysterious ideal. His mannerisms and way of thinking are of interest. Fold outwardly rather cool relations with internal affection for each other. So manifest these relations on a far distance. If there is no topic for conversation, which would be both interested in, communication is rather formal. Want more to express their point of view, than to listen to a partner. This is because the topic of conversation always falls in the lead, a strong one and regulatory functions, coached by another function, which is of little interest to listen. Impression of understanding and interest in it, though, and suspect that he is shallow. When there was a rapprochement, the nature of relationship takes a new, an unpleasant side. In words, an understanding usually remains good, especially when matching subtypes. In fact, it turns out, as if the partner does all you to do evil. About his intentions, or do not warn, or not enough to listen to each other. Therefore, do the opposite of what you expect from a partner. It can lead to considerable debate. Inner predisposition to the partner is not disappearing. Hope that the ideal still achievable, is not lost. Strong effect on these relations are also extra-introversion partners. Of the two extroverts, which bind the relationship of superego, one generally dissatisfied with the others that he pays little attention to him, too busy with extraneous matters. Of the two introverts usually one think that the other is too intrusive, does not leave him alone. In both cases, the close distance there are misunderstandings and quarrels.
Attitude of respect for each other. Superego means "superego." Partner is perceived as distant and somewhat mysterious ideal. His mannerisms and way of thinking are of interest. Fold outwardly rather cool relations with internal affection for each other. Since these relationships are manifested in the far distance.
If there is no topic for conversation, which would be both interested in, communication is rather formal. Want more to express their point of view, than to listen to a partner. This is because the topic of conversation always falls in the lead, a strong one and regulatory functions, coached by another function, which is of little interest to listen. Impression of understanding and interest in it, though, and suspect that he is shallow.
When there was a rapprochement, the nature of relationship takes a new, an unpleasant side. In words, an understanding usually remains good, especially when matching subtypes. In fact, it turns out, as if the partner does all you to do evil. About his intentions, or do not warn, or not enough to listen to each other. Therefore, do the opposite of what you expect from a partner. It can lead to considerable debate. Inner predisposition to the partner is not disappearing. Hope that the ideal still achievable, is not lost.
Strong effect on these relations are also extra-introversion partners. Of the two extroverts, which bind the relationship of superego, one generally dissatisfied with the others that he pays little attention to him, too busy with extraneous matters. Of the two introverts usually one think that the other is too intrusive, does not leave him alone. In both cases, the close distance there are misunderstandings and quarrels.
Valentine Meged, Anatoly Ovcharov
This is - a relationship of rivalry partners. Everyone tries to impress others, to show him their importance or priority than ever. The difficulty of understanding leads to loss of trust and hope that you will be properly understood. Have to adapt to each other, seek common ground, but the balance in the relationship comes a short time. Partners are very emotionally perceive each other and may unwittingly hurt. Sometimes it seems that the other does all the luck. Mutual irritation can develop into acute conflicts, especially in more intimate relationships or personal interests clash. Mutual deafness seen in the absence of proper attention to the interests of others and imposing their point of view. Needs rest from communion, after which the relationship is sometimes reversed. At a distance it can be quite pleasant companionship with an interesting exchange of views. Lack of understanding and lack of support in cases eventually leads to cooling.
Mutual respect and sympathy, which, however, the transition to a close psychological distance may lead to conflicts and misunderstandings. In terms of model A software feature one partner gets on the role function of the other (which is why there is an effect of admiration), and creative - on pain (which is annoying and can lead to conflicts), the observation - on the suggestive, and demonstration - at an activation. Relationships are not well suited for a joint life and family relationships.
Ekaterina Filatova Art to understand themselves and others "
Here the functional relationship "overlap" on the 2 nd and 3 rd channels, and in the first channels are different functions.
It may be that one partner helps the other, where the second is feeling insecure. A. Augustinavichyute believes this relationship is quite comfortable, often - nice and conflict, although the surface. Other Socionics define them, on the contrary, as a very tense, dangerous unexpected blow to weak functions of partners. Author of this book met both it and other kinds of relationships superego. Apparently, the decisive role played by personal characteristics of partners, the scope of their activities, their social status.
Given all this, the author once again like to caution the reader from the straight-line conclusion: In any case we should, proceeding from the knowledge of psycho-both partners, their social status and cultural level, to try to figure out how to show themselves or another Jung function in a particular situation .
In regards the superego, as well as in the kindred, it is possible pressure function Channel 2 on SOS partner - hence, there may be conflicts. But if both partners are respectful to each other, understand what the weakness of another, and seek help, using his strong function - in this case they will be able to successfully cooperate.
Eugene Gorenko, Vladimir Tolstikov, "Nature's own self"
The relationship is very attractive to both partners. Everyone can substitute your shoulder and offer help in some way so that the other partner is difficult. However interesting, but do the general case is difficult because of differences in approach, methods and so on. Perhaps the tensions, mutual resentment, rupture of relations. Partners would do well to pause from time to time to rest from each other.