Quasi-identical Relations
From http://www.socioforum.su/viewtopic.p...63dc34df2dfba4


ID Vaysband Working Paper on Socionics

There are no quarrels, but there are many disputes that are never productive. It is impossible to prove anything to each other. Talking about the same, are interested in the same things, but from completely different points of view.

OB Slinko "The key to my heart - Socionics"

In contrast to the identity, kvazitozhdestvenny partner does not cause self-pity. It seems that he is protected in his life that he and so "all right". This man is like and like you, and at the same time, something subtly different, and he goes through life not in the same way as any other, although a parallel to yours. Kvazitozhdestvennye partners are able to find common topics of conversation, deeply enough to understand each other, but it is constantly recognized mutual otherness, privnosyaschaya in a relationship feeling some discomfort and impede the full understanding and consent. Despite the inability to fully reconcile attitudes, these attitudes are soft: kvazitozhdestvenny can not hurt, even deliberate attacks "flow around", speak little, and the unpleasant residue of these relations do not contain. Contact between kvazitozhdestvennymi occurs easily and flows smoothly.

RK Graying "Information psychoanalysis"

The structure of the interaction of opposing blocs repeats IV. Change functions places mitigates the problems associated with such a structure. "Adult" - "self-confident teenager." This interaction resembles a mirror. Attempts to correct partner for all their persistence, almost never reach the degree of "discrediting". Partners can sometimes argue for hours, and not coming to a common denominator, but, nevertheless, interesting information and in the process imbued with respect for each other. This happens not always but often enough. Much easier than the previous reading or flows and cooperation, the partners often help out each other. Kvazitozhdestvenniki generally friendly to each other are configured. Though they lack the ability to stand up to the point of view of a partner, though it rarely leads to quarrels. Their behavior to each other is quite acceptable. "Unsure teen -" child ". Here, too, easier interaction than their opponents. Second sometimes seems a bit rude, but very rarely - a malicious and selfish. If partners have virtually no dualizirovany, their relations, of course, more difficult problems in this scenario is strongly reminiscent of the interaction of opposing, even if it is not such a strong desire to find fault with each other.

Lyme Stankevichyute "Intertype relationship"

They differ in that, living together or close to communicating, it is impossible to quarrel, get angry one, that is, separately. However, in this type of relationship there are many disputes that take a lot of strength, energy and of themselves are not fruitful, can last indefinitely. They do not happen ever winner. In this type of relationship is impossible to prove anything to each other. When this type of relationship living with two ethical types - this is a violent, emotional, full of passion lives. When two logical - more calm, but full of tension and insincerity.

AV Boukalov, G. Boiko, "Why Saddam Xuseyn wrong, or what is Socionics"

Interests seemed similar, but the close association arises misunderstanding each other. If Don Quixote thinks about abstract theories, the Jack London is interested in more practical areas. Academician Landau (Jack) said he mathematical theorems are not needed, people should know how to count those or other options. Collaborate with division of labor can be quite successful. With regard to family life, these relationships are not the worst, but not the most favorable.

VV Gulenko "Tests of reciprocity"

Discussion Tuning

Communication is formal in nature, as the information received from a partner often does not justify your expectations. To lead a decent discussion, you need to adjust to the style of conversation. It is very difficult to understand each other at once - meaning of utterances of another is revealed through a fairly long time, when revisiting the issue. The same idea formulated by partners in different ways. Because of the impossibility of anything else to prove unproductive misunderstandings and disputes. As a result - the underestimation of the partner.

Binary attributes intertype relationships

Quasi-identity - a good attitude for a crowded debate. In the presence of receptive public, the partners usually support each other, pick up and develop the ideas expressed by one of them. Drawn bold, far-reaching projects. However, in a narrow range of difficult to understand each other: the impression that the partner does not go into your information.

Kvazitozhdestvennye relations are stable when the partners agree on the position before taking anything serious. Otherwise, the benefits of mutual support will be small. Unprepared, is not configured to work together to get the useful effect of quasi impossible.

In kvazitozhdestvennyh relationship develops the business logic of both partners. Come to mind many ideas of business activity. Emotions are relevant only on the success or failure in their implementation. This attitude is also developing a sense of humor, generates not always justified optimism.

Kvazitozhdestvennye partners tend to test their ideas in practice, but not through gradual debugging, and a bold breakthrough. These relationships are pushing partners to take risks, awake in them the spirit of enterprise, encouraging. Kvazitozhdestvennoy pair can bring to bear experience accumulated in the past, had previously rejected, to revive the positive traditions.

Great dynamics differ kvazitozhdestvennye relationship. They are adventurous and action-packed, pushing partners to risky behavior. In these respects, is constantly replaced by plans that are put forward and try to challenging projects. They can not stop and catch his breath. In statics quasiidentity decays rapidly.

In kvazitozhdestvennyh relations, which are also involutional, at first you do not feel a special intensity. There is hope that the partner you still understand and join your opinion. However, this does not happen. The more the two are working on the same issue, the farther they are separated. To preserve the integrality, we have to pretend that they are followers. However, soon it will not save and you have to contrive something new or go back to past deferred issues.

VV Gulenko, AV Gars "Introduction to socionics"

It is a relationship of coexistence with a profound misunderstanding of each other. This can be a peaceful coexistence, especially if the partners of logic, or go to the showdown, if the partners of ethics. Of great importance is the coincidence of subtypes. When distinct subtypes in communion with kvazitozhdestvennym there internal tensions, the condemnation of his actions. It is, however, can pass, when the partners are united by one thing and dependent on each other. The first assignment is usually makes an irrational and rational accepts it. Kvazitozhdestvenny partner does not hurt, as a rule, your weaknesses. Threats on his part is not felt. But equality with him, too, do not feel like a business. He seems to be less capable, but the issues that you have obtained, is seeking for some reason much more. Because of this suffering self-esteem of both: such a situation is perceived as injustice. The most unpleasant thing in this relationship - the inability to understand a person until the end. Always a problem of "translation" of his information into your language. Written kvazitozhdestvennym almost impossible to read. Deciphering it takes away a lot of energy information and it seems useless. Product kvazitozhdestvennogo do not like. A Conversation with kvazitozhdestvennym though not heavy, but does not bring satisfaction. It seems that he is especially confusing, complicated or easy, pulling to one side. The main argument: The same can be stated differently, in understandable language. Kvazitozhdestvennye can find common topics of conversation, povozmuschatsya same. But the outputs of the difficult situation they see entirely different. Over time, begins to pursue a feeling of useless time spent. Therefore, nothing in particular does not bind them, parted easily and without regret. Rather colorless relationship, which is good saying: "Do you own wedding, but we have - their own."

Gulenko

It is a relationship of coexistence with a profound misunderstanding of each other. This can be a peaceful coexistence, especially if the partners of logic, or go to the showdown, if the partners of ethics. Of great importance is the coincidence of subtypes. When distinct subtypes in communion with kvazitozhdestvennym there internal tensions, the condemnation of his actions. It is, however, can pass, when the partners are united by one thing and dependent on each other. The first assignment is usually makes an irrational and rational accepts it. Kvazitozhdestvenny partner does not hurt, as a rule, your weaknesses. Threats on his part is not felt. But equality with him, too, do not feel like a business. He seems to be less capable, but the issues that you have obtained, is seeking for some reason much more. Because of this suffering self-esteem of both: such a situation is perceived as injustice.

The most unpleasant thing in this relationship - the inability to understand a person until the end. Always a problem of "translation" of his information into your language. Written kvazitozhdestvennym almost impossible to read. Deciphering it takes away a lot of energy information and it seems useless. Product kvazitozhdestvennogo do not like. A Conversation with kvazitozhdestvennym though not heavy, but does not bring satisfaction. It seems that he is especially confusing, complicated or easy, pulling to one side. The main argument: The same can be stated differently, in understandable language.

Kvazitozhdestvennye can find common topics of conversation, scuffed-muschatsya same. But the outputs of the difficult situation they see entirely different. Over time, begins to pursue a feeling of useless time spent. Therefore, nothing in particular does not bind them, parted easily and without regret. Rather colorless relationship, which is good saying: "Do you own wedding, but we have - their own."

Wikipedia

The relationship of peaceful coexistence with the coincidence of the strengths and weaknesses and do not match the values and interests. In terms of model A software feature corresponds to one kvazitozhdika demonstrative function of another, the creative - the observation, role-playing - activation, pain - suggestive.

Valentine Meged, Anatoly Ovcharov

Good relations to partnership and cooperation, but not very conducive to closer relations. There is a desire to understand a partner to help him, to give advice. Views and methods of another unusual and interesting. This generates a lot of discussion and disagreement, but there is a desire to find a compromise. During the approach, especially when affected by personal interests, even spat can quickly destroy these relations. There is difficulty in understanding and inability to take the interests of another. In collaboration difference approaches lead to a desire to move away from a partner and do everything differently. Partners are interested in one and the same things but see them from different points of view. Each prefers to go his own way, without looking at the opinion and experience of another. Because of this, both feel a certain insecurity partner, the ability to throw in a difficult moment, though, these suspicions are usually false.

Ekaterina Filatova Art to understand themselves and others "

Here the partners have cross-contact of weak functions. Their major function blocks are the same but have different locations and different "vertkost" and so they share common interests. However, often each of them seems like another to him in some way inferior, even though doing something much better for some reason ...

Since there is no strong output functions on the weak, the conflicts in these relationships are rare. If in the future co-operation makes no sense, partners can easily leave. If there is a sense - just as easy to find a contact.

Eugene Gorenko, Vladimir Tolstikov, "Nature's own self"

Partners differ on the scale of rationality-irrationality. In general, a good understanding between them, the interests of relatives. But the relationship is not too strong, and if there is no need to continue dialogue, the partners can easily leave. You can describe these relations as very favorable.