Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Impossible Types

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    1,158
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Impossible Types

    Has anyone tried to visualize what someone would be like if their functions were arranged in a way that doesn't follow the model A (provided they could still function). For example... would find meaning in peoples emotions :-). I guess thats sorta what a dual pair does though.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    37
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    There are certain neurological disorders that do render people emotionless (moreor less). Often they can get through life and people hardly notice.
    INTJ/ENTP

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,294
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Edited for gayness.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    1,246
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I thought the topic was going to be about like, types that are impossible, you know like "you're impossible!!!"

    hahahahaha
    Entp
    ILE

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    M-H λ
    Posts
    2,609
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah I have I said to myself why not for example. I came up with general rules like there are limited resources in the land of the functions and that many can't survive on so little food etc etc but a lot of it treats functions as if they exist independently of matter (the brain/ human body etc which is my unpopular opinion ) so I know people won't like em. Also, there are a lot of structural problems in the model I created thus far like if T resources are limited why isn't the person dominant for example since they don't use the same resources so then I came up with various other explanations etc etc but I can't fit all the functions into it... I was trying to come up with my own model for a long time but I guess I got lazy perhaps it is time to revive the idea.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Has anyone tried to visualize what someone would be like if their functions were arranged in a way that doesn't follow the model A (provided they could still function). For example... would find meaning in peoples emotions :-). I guess thats sorta what a dual pair does though.
    Wouldn't the mere existence of such a person violate Socionics and thus disprove it?

  7. #7
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,450
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Slava (at home) View Post
    Has anyone tried to visualize what someone would be like if their functions were arranged in a way that doesn't follow the model A (provided they could still function). For example... would find meaning in peoples emotions :-). I guess thats sorta what a dual pair does though.
    Such a type would conflict with the idea of the static/dynamic dichotomy present in temperaments. Any type can find meaning in people's emotions anyways, so proposing that only such a person is capable of doing that is a strawman waiting to be toppled.

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanmat25 View Post
    Wouldn't the mere existence of such a person violate Socionics and thus disprove it?
    Finding a person who finds meaning in emotions? They're everywhere.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  8. #8
    Marie84's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    TIM
    EII
    Posts
    2,359
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wow old dead zombie thread

    I think it can be easy to spot someones base and demonstrative IE, in the case of IEE, making them appear very + with the hidden in the back, but the is all really smoke-and-mirrors, so under all the vivid displays of they still prioritize

    so basically, the 8th function can sometimes seem more apparent than the 2nd function making someone seem like they're ego is made up of two extroverted or introverted IE's
    EII INFj
    Forum status: retired

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    8
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Galen View Post


    Finding a person who finds meaning in emotions? They're everywhere.

    If their was some hypothetical way to measure, to suitable precision, ones strongest two functions, and one found someone to have their first two functions were Ne and Ni that result would violate socionics and thus disprove it. The point being, the Socionics can be falsified if such a case is found.

  10. #10
    when you see the booty Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    everywhere at once
    Posts
    8,450
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanmat25 View Post
    If their was some hypothetical way to measure, to suitable precision, ones strongest two functions, and one found someone to have their first two functions were Ne and Ni that result would violate socionics and thus disprove it. The point being, the Socionics can be falsified if such a case is found.
    There are pretty reliable ways of measuring strong functions. Also both Ne and Ni are contradictory ways of thinking. Both can't exist in the same brain because they analyze different and opposite kinds of information, and if there is someone who exists like that I haven't found them.
    "And above all, watch with glittering eyes the whole world around you because the greatest secrets are always hidden in the most unlikely places. Those who don't believe in magic will never find it." -Roald Dahl

    http://forum.socionix.com/
    It's pretty cool

  11. #11
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanmat25 View Post
    If their was some hypothetical way to measure, to suitable precision, ones strongest two functions, and one found someone to have their first two functions were Ne and Ni that result would violate socionics and thus disprove it. The point being, the Socionics can be falsified if such a case is found.
    That just makes them outside the bounds of the model.

  12. #12
    Darn Socks Director Abbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    6,728
    Mentioned
    237 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    About half the people I introduce socionics to try to rearrange the shapes. I forbid it.

    ESTj
    1w2 sp/so 1-2-6
    Brilliand's Younger Sister
    Squishy's Older Sister

    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •