Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Faces of Consensus - ESFj (Hugo)

  1. #1
    Crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,098
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Faces of Consensus - ESFj (Hugo)

    The following pictures depict the Eastern Consensus (75%-100% convergence) of the type ESFj. Full methodology, and additional data can be be found at the Source:
    http://translate.googleusercontent.c...XyVl5ddkbpG3lg


    Karl Briullov


    George Washington


    Jules Verne


    Victor Hugo


    Prosper Merimee


    Heinrich Schliemann


    Etush Vladimir
    ILI (FINAL ANSWER)

  2. #2
    Bananas are good. Aleksei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    The Rift
    TIM
    C-EIE, 7-4-8 sx/sp
    Posts
    1,632
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Washington was a grotesquely obvious LSI-Ti. Verne was probably LII-Ne.
    What do these signs mean—, , etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason, (Ne) is not exactly the same as Ne in MBTI.

    Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function (extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).

    For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.

    -Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •