Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Collaboration Styles

  1. #1
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Collaboration Styles

    They are intended as the counterpart of Gulenko's "Romance Styles", but based on the so-called Rational functions (F, T), that I came up with, based on the idea of Azeroff's:

    - Fe: student
    - Ti: professor
    - Te: physician
    - Fi: patient

    [As I decided to avoid bundling keyword titles with descriptions to represent different types, attitudes, IEs or dichotomies from now on - I know that I used to say that a keyword is better than a cryptic code, but I changed my mind, based on the experience, because people use to stick to their literal meaning instead of using them as a hint -, I gave way to their descriptions and I leave to Azeroff the task of completing the article with them, if he's interested. (I can add them in the OP, if it's ok)]
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

  2. #2
    Crispy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,099
    Mentioned
    17 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Now to side by side with Slater's random ideas system...
    - Fe: student - Mental Infantile
    - Ti: professor - Mental Caregiver
    - Te: physician - Mental Aggressor
    - Fi: patient - Mental Victim

    Very interesting...
    ILI (FINAL ANSWER)

  3. #3
    EffyCold The Ineffable's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Wallachia
    TIM
    ILE
    Posts
    2,195
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Crispy View Post
    Now to side by side with Slater's random ideas system...
    - Fe: student - Mental Infantile
    - Ti: professor - Mental Caregiver
    - Te: physician - Mental Aggressor
    - Fi: patient - Mental Victim

    Very interesting...
    slater's associations are bullshit, a quick and blind collation. The only things that I could match with mine would be the Fe/Ti, because they work similarly to Ne/Si (Merry is the same thing with Judicious, applied on Rational functions) applied at an intellectual and emotional level.

    Otherwise:
    - any kind of "aggressor/victim" applied to Merry/Judicious is wrong (eg. Te: emotional infantile), and the other way around (like Ne: spiritual aggressor ); the initiative in Merry/Judicious belongs to the provider (support, imposition), while in Decisive/Serious it belongs to the provided (evaluation, demand);
    - Fi/Te do not interact through the same channels as Ti/Fe, intellectual/emotional, but rather something ethical/factual, or something;
    - "physical" is totally off and laughable, and so is "spiritual" up to a certain extent - not all Intuitive types are spiritual.
    Shock intuition, diamond logic.
     

    The16types.info Scientific Model

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •